It is confusing.
I believe that the latest thinking is that we will do some episodes concurrently with TOS-era episodes (so we may do, say an episode that takes place immediately after "The Man Trap"). We will also be doing episodes shortly after the last episode of TOS ("Turnabout Intruder"). Lastly, we'll be doing episodes after the ship has its "Phase II" refit (but before it gets refit again shortly before TMP. So I think it's actually three eras that we'll be jumping to and from.
The title we will use for an episode ("New Voyages" versus "Phase II") seems to be related to when we decide to set the episode.
And yes, nothing that we might do that takes place in the later time frame is relying on our earlier episodes. We could well do an episode, for example, where we go off to the Klingon home world--with no recognition of our episode "Kitumba."
Some say our show has had some much change that it's practically a new show. Others just call it a reboot.
Having two names for essentially a single production is confusing enough. Add to that relating those names to whatever time period you set your stories in is a recipe for disaster and could potentially turn off new viewers. Overall, it makes the brand inconsistent.
Understood--and not my call.
Aside from the periodic name change, what are your thoughts on doing different episodes of different TOS-related eras?
Only if the story warrants it and is worth telling. Bottom line for me: Is it a story that needs to be told? Does it have a theme worth exploring? Is it something that's trying to actually say something and not just connect the dots?