Although interestingly the Star Trek Log for that episode has a late 2380 stardate. The LD timeline is just a bit of a mess right now.It should also be noted the second digit of the stardates went up for the second season, which usually does signify a year has passed.
Aside from O'Brien and a handful of others here and there, non-coms have rarely been part of Star Trek. At least Lower Decks recognizes O'Brien, a non-com as Starfleet's greatest.And where were the non-com folks????
Sure is. Though, I wonder, if this tweet is true and we are going to see New Year's 2381 get celebrated in the third season, if they may end up doing some in-joke referencing how messed up their timeline is. That could be a rather epic, long game in-joke.The LD timeline is just a bit of a mess right now.
Yeah, absolutely. Reminds me Stone Trek, for those who remember it. It was a flash-animated Trek spoof styled like 60s Flintstones cartoons …I dig the "title treatment they developed for that series proposal". It's feels 60s googie Space Age stylish in a way.
Some of those Placeholder LCARS are probably fan art. I know the Nova Class MSD is, it has the LCARS 47 watermark on the bottom right(Note the Nova-class (?) schematic on the left.)
I feel like every designer wants to include those stations lowered into the floor on their version of the bridge (Eaves had them on his sketches for the Voyager bridge as well), but they always get scrapped.
And for a series about mainly the good guys having walkways with no handrails is only for the bad guys.It seems to me like lowered stations like that would make it difficult to compose shots and, in a life action show, would provide a hazard for actors falling into them. So maybe that's why they never get used?
And for a series about mainly the good guys having walkways with no handrails is only for the bad guys.
Which also happens to be Palpatine's homeworld. Hmmm...Naboo wasn't much better.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.