• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Lower Decks General Discussion Thread

^Yeah, but the "Beta" shift were doing things that we saw the non-com do in the TNG era shows.
 
And where were the non-com folks????
Aside from O'Brien and a handful of others here and there, non-coms have rarely been part of Star Trek. At least Lower Decks recognizes O'Brien, a non-com as Starfleet's greatest.
The LD timeline is just a bit of a mess right now.
Sure is. Though, I wonder, if this tweet is true and we are going to see New Year's 2381 get celebrated in the third season, if they may end up doing some in-joke referencing how messed up their timeline is. That could be a rather epic, long game in-joke.

Or maybe I'm overthinking things.
 
I got season one on blu-ray for Christmas and just watched all of the bonus content. It's all interesting stuff, but I'm a little underwhelmed by the amount of actual production art they are showing. There's lots of animatics and stuff like that, which is cool, but very little from the actual design phase of the show. Here's what I found …

This looks like it's an earlier version of the Cerritos … err San Diego, as the ship was called in the first series proposal:

s0rKkU6.jpg


The title treatment they developed for that series proposal:

u3ghBXN.jpg


An early bridge design sketch. Looks more complicated than the one they went with in the end. I feel like every designer wants to include those stations lowered into the floor on their version of the bridge (Eaves had them on his sketches for the Voyager bridge as well), but they always get scrapped. (Note the Nova-class (?) schematic on the left.)

WXtXaDq.png


And a sketch and rough CG graphics for their mess hall, all based on the LCARS design elements from TNG …

UbYbCFe.png


YLXXT4L.png


SiDI0Kx.png
 
Thank you for sharing!

Very interesting about the lowered stations on the bridge.
Maybe a reason not to do it (in real life) it would just look weird (some sitting, some standing, some lowered) and uncanny up the nose angles for all others in the background of the shot that are not at lowered stations?

I dig the "title treatment they developed for that series proposal". It's feels 60s googie Space Age stylish in a way.
 
I feel like every designer wants to include those stations lowered into the floor on their version of the bridge (Eaves had them on his sketches for the Voyager bridge as well), but they always get scrapped.

It seems to me like lowered stations like that would make it difficult to compose shots and, in a life action show, would provide a hazard for actors falling into them. So maybe that's why they never get used?
 
I’m actually thrilled with the 10 episode order too for Disco. 13-15 can get to be a bit much in the midst of serialized storytelling. Sometimes they run out of story before they run out of episodes. I’d be okay with any number of episodes. As long as the story fit it.

Edit: oops, wrong thread! Should have been in Disco.This is the problem when you follow all the new Trek show forums and all have items about renewals.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top