While I haven't read either of those novels (Sorry, KRAD!I established in The Art of the Impossible and also in The Klingon Art of War, and possibly elsewhere, that Azetbur's successor passed a law that women could not serve on the High Council or become chancellor, a law instituted as an overreaction to Azetbur's rule. This still allows Gowron's line to work with Azetbur (and L'Rell), and fits in with the Klingon politics post-Praxis and pre-"Yesterday's Enterprise."
While I haven't read either of those novels (Sorry, KRAD!), my headcanon on that discrepancy has long been something very close to that: Something disastrous happened during Azetbur's reign that made the Klingons decide to ban women from the Council.
While I haven't read either of those novels (Sorry, KRAD!), my headcanon on that discrepancy has long been something very close to that: Something disastrous happened during Azetbur's reign that made the Klingons decide to ban women from the Council.
The problem with Star Trek is it frequently tries to make sense in ways real history doesn't.
Very true!
In any event, I don't think there's any plausibility problem with the idea that Kaarg as a reactionary would ban women from the High Council without there needing to be any disaster or problem with Azetbur's leadership.
True but he needs support and the reactionaries are usually reacting in regards to progression.
I wasn't talking about history. I was talking about my personal headcanon for a continuity glitch in Star Trek and what would make the most dramatic story.On the other hand, nothing disastrous needs to happen for reactionaries to double-down on discrimination. Real history is full of reactionaries that double down on discrimination after a period of advancement for oppressed people's rights.
I wasn't talking about history. I was talking about my personal headcanon for a continuity glitch in Star Trek and what would make the most dramatic story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.