I guess it is all up to tomorrows episode to see if this show will be one (of the very few) series that make a full, great series or if it will end up a big disappointment like X-Files, Heroes and many, many other series that have gone before it.
Heroes had only one great season--season one. Unlike LOST that was more of a self-contained standalone season where almost all the questions raised were answered that year--there was four or five that weren't and were meant to be carried over to the following season and one big one meant to span the series--the explosive rift Isaac repeatedly painted--but for the most part it stood on its own. So you can sort of separate it out from the others--Lost is more of a Whole and you can't so easily separate stuff out anymore than you can a baked cake once all the ingredients have been mixed and cooked. And as Kring originally intended the character arcs wrapped up in satisfying ways in season one. And that is probably why the Heroes characters didn't do much since then because their arcs the way Kring wanted were complete and didn't see them being around 3 years later. Heroes is also interesting in the way that most series have an awkward beginning as it tries to find itself, a strong middle consistent run, then comes off the rails at the end. But it had a brilliant first season then just got progressively worse--it burned very bright but burned out quickly. So I can actually just think of Heroes as running one season.
The XFiles had started coming off the rails in season 6 got progressively worse and made the mythology more and more convoluted and incoherent that I just gave up trying to make sense of it. It didn't help that they got rid of Duchovny in the last two seasons and in the final season reduced Gillian's role to basically a cameo. It also had a bad series finale. But since the mythology was only the focus of season premieres, Feb sweeps or season finales and the bulk of the show was episodic I can still enjoy it despite the myth being messed up. Lost, on the otherhand, is so interconnected and everything ties into eveything else that one bad misstep can poison to a certain degree everything it is feeding into. We are obviously going to have pieces of the puzzle never filled in that are just going to be voids when you go back and rewatch it because those answers or flashbacks you thought were coming never do i.e. the shitload of questions I've posted over and over in the last few episode threads. But is that going to be enough to undermine to a degree all the other stuff it did do right--like the character moments, twists, cliffhangers, reveals, build up etc. I don't know. LOST is this big complicated show that is never cut-and-dry so why should my final verdict be any less conflicted and complex.
BSG had an uneven final season I thought--the plot mythology was unsatisfyingly wrapped up but amazingly it had a great finale. In fact, I see some similiarities to LOST's final season(although I think LOST had a better overall more consistent final season so far than BSG but BSG did have higher highs than LOST with "The Oath", "No Exit", "Daybreak" for instance--LOST really has only had "Ab Aeterno") where it felt the writers were stalling and dragging everything out until the series finale. Like BSG, we keep waiting for answers as the number of hours left to possibly address the outstanding questions dwindle and then cross our fingers that maybe the writers can pull it altogether and only need 2 hours to do so. BSG couldn't, over the last few episodes suggest to me LOST might not either.
BSG's final season didn't really build up to the series finale--it felt more like a standalone sendoff like VOY's Endgame or TNG's AGT where the season didn't build to it--it just had a manufactured crisis devised in order to have something the finale could center around and Moore pretty much confirmed it in an interview after "Daybreak" aired. LOST feels that way too. It doesn't feel like series or even the season has built up slowly and methodically to this series finale--it feels like a standalone story. It doesn't feel like "There's NO place Like HOme" for instance where the entire season centered around this and everything was building to it. Part of that is how they pretty much sidelined mysteries for this season and stumbled around so of course they'll just stumble into this.
I wondered back in season 4 how they would top letting the Six leave the island and return to their lives--well the answer was they couldn't. I was excited about the S1 finale, the S3 finale, the S4 finle and the S5 finale but tonite with the series finale I shouldn't have the indifferent attitude I do and I fault the writers for not knocking it out of the park this year.
TNG had a weak final season but AGT is still to this day the best series finale in tv history followed by MASH and BSG.
Prison Break had a great final season but a weak finale. ENT had a good final season but it really wasn't intended to necessarily be the final season so I'm not sure it is fair to include it here although TATV was middling--I don't hate it the way so many do.
So as it stands now DS9 is the only series I've watched that managed to not only have a good final season but also a good finale. It started off a little rocky but it did so much better in the second half--doing a little bit of everything well--touching on elements from all over the series, letting us spend some good quality time with the characters one last time before launching into the final stretch, bringing back old faces one last time(compare this to the ham-fisted attempts by the writers to do this with all the pointless namedropping and brief cameos of old dead faces), giving us a tightly written exciting epic Final Chapter and a series finale that did more things right than wrong with a heaping dose of emotion, excitement. So I guess I should say kudos to Behr!
LOST should have been as tightly focused and built up to a fever pitch paying off in the finale but they sort of just walked into it with very little fanfare beyond the artificial kind done by much more effective promos and ads--sadly the ads jazzed me more than the episodes themselves over the last few weeks.
Like I mentioned a few weeks ago I enjoyed the series but judging it isn't going to be easy and I might not ultimately know how I feel about it until a few years from now once I get some distance. It had so many good episodes, such a long running streak of consistency in the middle years, lots of great isolated moments, lots of wonderful twists, lots of inventive mysteries, OMG moments, striking memorable visuals and visual reveals and S3-5 built well on things however since LOST has always been a Six act massive Story/Mystery you kinda realize that build-up and suspense and non-answers will get you so far eventually time comes for payoff and if we use the one hour mystery analogy for LOST the series you have to say that its last 15 minutes of payoff so far has been rather underwhelming and not the equal to the build-up and work done in the middle seasons. So that is going to color things to a degree.
It just seemed like they were poised at the end of season 5 to take everything set up and pulled together that extra mile this year and build on those successes instead they reverted back to the malaise of the early weaker seasons of the show.
I'm not happy more wasn't done with Dharma, Eloise was noteably absent, the Sayid arc was mishandled, Widmore was brought in this season and didn't do much and in this episode they just pretty much rushed it to wrap it up, the Claire/Kate stuff went nowhere, Jacob and Smokey's origin story was disappointing, the muddle of Jacob and Smokey and their motivations sucked etc so that hurts. So it will ultimately be a mixed bag I think. Best show this decade? Yes. Could it have really much so much better? Yes. Will a weak final season ruin it? NO.