Alright, I want to read Rosetta, being a Linda Park/Hoshi Sato fan; and I'm interested in Surak's Soul (since it's a short novel, and T'Pol is pretty cool).
Are these two recommended? How do they stand as Trek novels in terms of action and character?
Alright, I want to read Rosetta, being a Linda Park/Hoshi Sato fan; and I'm interested in Surak's Soul (since it's a short novel, and T'Pol is pretty cool).
Are these two recommended? How do they stand as Trek novels in terms of action and character?
I liked "Rosetta" quite a bit. It does a good job of demonstrating the pre-Federation political situation in the sectors between the later-Federation core and the Klingon Empire, if somewhat undermined by our never hearing of the starring community of civilizations again (I keep waiting for them to show up or be mentioned elsewhere. I imagine, based on their apparent location, that the Borg fleet got them in the end).
I loved the villain, who was always a delight, and Hoshi Sato was indeed handled quite well. I've always liked her character, and I was glad to see her take a leading role here. Travis Mayweather gets a subplot, too, which earned the book extra points. "Rosetta" was funny, had an intriguing mystery (if wrapped up a bit too quickly at the end), and if you like action, has enough to please, I think.
One sub-plot doesn't sit entirely comfortably with the post-finale books (if you read those) but there's almost nothing openly contradictory, and genuinely continuity is handled well, without overshadowing the story. If you're not a big continuity fan, though, don't worry because this book is a stand-alone.
I'm afraid I haven't read "Surak's Soul".![]()
I liked "Rosetta" quite a bit. It does a good job of demonstrating the pre-Federation political situation in the sectors between the later-Federation core and the Klingon Empire, if somewhat undermined by our never hearing of the starring community of civilizations again (I keep waiting for them to show up or be mentioned elsewhere. I imagine, based on their apparent location, that the Borg fleet got them in the end).
One sub-plot doesn't sit entirely comfortably with the post-finale books (if you read those) but there's almost nothing openly contradictory, and genuinely continuity is handled well, without overshadowing the story. If you're not a big continuity fan, though, don't worry because this book is a stand-alone.![]()
Are these two recommended? How do they stand as Trek novels in terms of action and character?
I liked "Rosetta" quite a bit. It does a good job of demonstrating the pre-Federation political situation in the sectors between the later-Federation core and the Klingon Empire, if somewhat undermined by our never hearing of the starring community of civilizations again (I keep waiting for them to show up or be mentioned elsewhere. I imagine, based on their apparent location, that the Borg fleet got them in the end).
What I thought was clever was how it showed that community as being in decline, the implication being that it ceased to exist as a political entity and maybe got absorbed into other, later powers including the UFP. But that does leave the question of where the specific alien races established in the novel went.
One sub-plot doesn't sit entirely comfortably with the post-finale books (if you read those) but there's almost nothing openly contradictory, and genuinely continuity is handled well, without overshadowing the story. If you're not a big continuity fan, though, don't worry because this book is a stand-alone.![]()
What's the inconsistency? (You can put it in a spoiler box.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.