You mean subjectively speaking. I have yet to see objective criteria for evaluating a movie or any other kind of art, popular or otherwise.![]()
Pffft. I came up with such a criteria while in the bath this morning.
You mean subjectively speaking. I have yet to see objective criteria for evaluating a movie or any other kind of art, popular or otherwise.![]()
You mean subjectively speaking. I have yet to see objective criteria for evaluating a movie or any other kind of art, popular or otherwise.![]()
Pffft. I came up with such a criteria while in the bath this morning.
This thread has 337 posts, 23 pages AND OVER 9000!!!! views. How did it go from Levar Burton talking about JJ killing Prime Trek timeline, to how many film school graduates on this board? I thought the debate on whether St 09 was really Trek or not was resolved 4 years ago. We are 2 months away from the next movie and the haters are still there. Why can't we give love one more chance?
Wow there seem to be an exorbitant amount of film school graduates on this board recently...
I was thinking the same thing.![]()
You mean subjectively speaking. I have yet to see objective criteria for evaluating a movie or any other kind of art, popular or otherwise.![]()
Pffft. I came up with such a criteria while in the bath this morning.
That is to say, YOUR criteria. Hence, it is subjective.
The characters in Abrams Trek are very broad but that's just his approach. Everything is louder, including the characterisation.
I have a dream that one day Star Trek in film will be a science-fiction series about exploring the unknown or the human condition. Catering to the lowest common denominator with a vengeful villain in a fucking black trenchcoat going on a rampage is less my kinda thing. It's treating the audience like they're stupid. Which the target audience is, but I'd like Trek to aim higher.
The opening of the film sounds more like Star Trek than anything in the rest of the movie.
That's a lot of dissertations!
So you're hoping that someone will produce a Star Trek movie that will not make any money.
Man, everyone's real prickly about it. I only mentioned it to counter the idea that disliking ST09 was some kind of 'film school graduate' thing.
Man, everyone's real prickly about it. I only mentioned it to counter the idea that disliking ST09 was some kind of 'film school graduate' thing.
Don't take it personal. You seem not to take this too seriously, which is how it should be.![]()
That one has fewer posts expressing an opinion on the film. Ergo…
You mean subjectively speaking. I have yet to see objective criteria for evaluating a movie or any other kind of art, popular or otherwise.![]()
Pffft. I came up with such a criteria while in the bath this morning.
That is to say, YOUR criteria. Hence, it is subjective
Pffft. I came up with such a criteria while in the bath this morning.
That is to say, YOUR criteria. Hence, it is subjective
Nobody came up with "a criteria", in the bath or anywhere else. You either came up with a criterion, or you came up with several criteria.
A lot?I think we can all agree that a lot of people are a little hostile to ST 09 even Will Shatner and perhaps Levar Burton. They just have a subtle way of saying it.
I seem to have lost a pet ant around here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.