... this exercise strikes me as doubly perverted.
This comment with that avatar is made of win and awesome.
Thank you.

... this exercise strikes me as doubly perverted.
We may just have to accept that the Marvel version of the Three Mile Island incident happened later than it did in our universe. Unless Scott is about 45 in the movies it just doesn't work out.
Well he should be hitting his 60s in the comic.We may just have to accept that the Marvel version of the Three Mile Island incident happened later than it did in our universe. Unless Scott is about 45 in the movies it just doesn't work out.
Then of course there are issues such as where are the other heroes while Spidey is battling Sandman, or when the F4 are chasing down the Silver Surfer. Should we just assume that the absent adventurers were otherwise engaged, maybe?
^ Well how does it work in the comics universe? I've read a few Marvel universe comics but not loads.
I never really get how many superheroes does NY even need? Spider-Man, Daredevil, Fantastic 4, the X-Men are nearby. Maybe in the 70s Taxi Driver era when NY could be a dangerous place, but nowadays post Giuliani there can't be that many purse grabbers for Spider-Man to look out for ...
"The FF and Avengers generally deal with fate-of-the-world stuff. Daredevil focuses mostly on Hell's Kitchen and organized crime, Doc Strange handles the supernatural, the X-Men tackle mutant problems. When it comes to general street crime, robberies, assaults, that sort of thing, I'm typically the first responder."
Plus why do people hate mutants like the X-Men, and yet love freaks like the FF and Spider-Man?
I guess I can understand that even if I do not agree. However I guess if it were in the timeline it would be pretty much first.I made the conscious decision to start at the beginning of the current comic movie fad, which I placed either in '98 with Blade or '00 with X-Men.
I'd just as soon treat the FF films as apocryphal.
I figure it's because mutants are kind of a race. A mutant isn't "one of us" who's been changed, but someone who was born fundamentally different.Plus why do people hate mutants like the X-Men, and yet love freaks like the FF and Spider-Man?
I figure it's because mutants are kind of a race. A mutant isn't "one of us" who's been changed, but someone who was born fundamentally different.Plus why do people hate mutants like the X-Men, and yet love freaks like the FF and Spider-Man?
Which brings up an interesting point. How do people know that Spider-Man was "changed" and not born with the powers? I mean, maybe after time, he gave his story to a reporter, but when he first arrived on the scene?
Wouldn't people automatically assume he was a mutant?
So if that's all you have to say, then go away, you bore me.Ok, lemme start this off by saying I know that officially the different film franchises are in totally separate continuities. I don't care. If that's all you have to say, then go away, you bore me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.