It's been a while since we've had an acutal discussion devoted to the 96 movie, and since it's just been released on DVD in North America for the first time, now seems the most appropriate time.
Although I've been watching Doctor Who since its revival in 2005, I've only just begun watching classic era in the past year. But, consistently I've noticed the 96 movie is generally a source of debate in fandom circles. Although McGann is generally considered to have provided a solid performance as the Doctor, the movie itself has been the target of criticism and scorn, though it does seem to have vocal supporters.
After watching the movie for the first time, I have to ask: what was wrong with it? I found it to be a genuinely entertaining movie and enjoyed it quite a bit.
I'll admit, I have mixed feeling about how the Master is protrayed here. I enjoyed him during the first half when he was a smooth and cool villain, much in the same vein as the other Masters. But I found once the final fight comes around and he puts on the red Time Lord robe he quickly turns into a cliche cartoon supervillain. And the ending itself was confusing.
And while Paul McGann is excellent as the Eighth Doctor, it is rather unfortunate that his only televised performance as the Doctor has him saddled with an amnesia storyline. Also, Sylvester McCoy really is wasted here as well. I understand he never was meant to be integral to the movie, but couldn't they have had at least one line of dialogue that wasn't him mumbling to himself or screaming through gasps of breath?
Still, a fun and entertaining story that I actually consider among some of the better Doctor Who out there. While it would have been great to see more McGann, if this is the only filmed Eighth Doctor adventure, then at least it's a pretty damn good one.
So what say the rest of you? What are your thoughts on the 1996 Doctor Who telemovie?
Although I've been watching Doctor Who since its revival in 2005, I've only just begun watching classic era in the past year. But, consistently I've noticed the 96 movie is generally a source of debate in fandom circles. Although McGann is generally considered to have provided a solid performance as the Doctor, the movie itself has been the target of criticism and scorn, though it does seem to have vocal supporters.
After watching the movie for the first time, I have to ask: what was wrong with it? I found it to be a genuinely entertaining movie and enjoyed it quite a bit.
I'll admit, I have mixed feeling about how the Master is protrayed here. I enjoyed him during the first half when he was a smooth and cool villain, much in the same vein as the other Masters. But I found once the final fight comes around and he puts on the red Time Lord robe he quickly turns into a cliche cartoon supervillain. And the ending itself was confusing.
And while Paul McGann is excellent as the Eighth Doctor, it is rather unfortunate that his only televised performance as the Doctor has him saddled with an amnesia storyline. Also, Sylvester McCoy really is wasted here as well. I understand he never was meant to be integral to the movie, but couldn't they have had at least one line of dialogue that wasn't him mumbling to himself or screaming through gasps of breath?
Still, a fun and entertaining story that I actually consider among some of the better Doctor Who out there. While it would have been great to see more McGann, if this is the only filmed Eighth Doctor adventure, then at least it's a pretty damn good one.
So what say the rest of you? What are your thoughts on the 1996 Doctor Who telemovie?