I indoctrinated Kate when we were both children. She watched Genesis when she was three.she must have been a competist to put them on her Christmas list.
I indoctrinated Kate when we were both children. She watched Genesis when she was three.she must have been a competist to put them on her Christmas list.
Just watched Underworld because of the convo here about it.
I agree with the poster that praised parts 1 and 4. Those were pretty decent. 2 and 3 were filler, and not all that great.
Also, the CSO was quite bad.
Are there any accounts stating why the production opted to "marry off" Leela instead of having her heroically die saving the Doctor? Were they simply resistant to the idea of killing a (relatively) long term traveling companion?
...though Louise Jameson was adamant that this would be her last story and a new companion had been developed, Graham Williams remained optimistic that he could persuade her to stay.
Well, I always thought because of the events of The Deadly Assassin the Doctor may have felt the Time Lords wouldn't dare mess with Leela's memories like they did with Jamie and Zoe (which is also why I always thought why the Doctor really didn't take her with him - he wanted her to remember him and their travels). Also, you know, he was being Presidential and whatever.God, I hated "The Invasion of Time" and the clumsy attempt to pass off the interior of some old hospital as the interior of the TARDIS. And the half-assed way of writing out Leela, and the total failure to address why Leela could come to Gallifrey when Sarah Jane couldn't.
Well, I always thought because of the events of The Deadly Assassin the Doctor may have felt the Time Lords wouldn't dare mess with Leela's memories like they did with Jamie and Zoe (which is also why I always thought why the Doctor really didn't take her with him - he wanted her to remember him and their travels). Also, you know, he was being Presidential and whatever.
I doubt Holmes thought very much of The War Games and I'm sure it was as simple as "toying with the idea of a solo Tom Baker without companions series" as Hinchcliffe said. But story-wise, the Doctor's not been back to Gallifrey since his very trial in that serial. He literally was exposed there, at last, and the Time Lords manipulated his companions' memories of their travels with him. It seems reasonable to assume that, with the hindsight that the Doctor asks Sarah to "not forget him" that that would fittiingly be on his mind at that time. If he goes to Gallifrey he might lose Sarah.Interesting take. I always interpreted it as the Doctor being forbidden to bring a human by Gallifreyan law, but now that I look over the transcript, all he really says is "I can't take Sarah to Gallifrey" and "I can't take you with me," without ever explaining why. Even Terrance Dicks's novelizations of "The Hand of Fear" and "The Deadly Assassin" don't elaborate any further than the dialogue does. So you could be onto something.
Of course, he could have picked her up after, but...lets not dwell on that for now.
Yeah, but isn't Sarah Jane the first companion he left behind? When you think about it, everyone else left on their own or forcibly before then.
The War Games
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.