• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Kirk's fate before Generations

I don’t know who this John Byrne person is. I was just speculating how the Nexus would make sense in the way it was described by Guinan and how her description didn’t bear this out.

Not a comic book / superman fan i take it?
 
I always liked the idea that we never knew what happened to Kirk after that final log entry at the end of TUC. That his fate was just kinda left up to each persons own imagination with just little clues or offhand mentions here and there.

The fact that they brought him to the 24th century only to drop him off a cliff never sat right.
 
So, before the Generations movie, I only recall seeing vague references to Kirk in TNG. But no definitive statement about whether he was alive or dead or, if he was alive, what he was up to.

My question: Before Generations was their an official or fan statement/idea/theories about Kirk's status? Also, were there any Trek novels or comics that said he or showed he was alive in a story that took place after the Enterprise B incident and thus was contradicted once that movie came out?
Well, I just thougt Kirk was enjoying his pension ;)
 
I always liked the idea that we never knew what happened to Kirk after that final log entry at the end of TUC. That his fate was just kinda left up to each persons own imagination with just little clues or offhand mentions here and there.

The fact that they brought him to the 24th century only to drop him off a cliff never sat right.
But we see exactly what happens. He flies directly into that star and they all die.
 
So one day I stumbled upon the TNG article for "Too Short A Season" and the Background Information of the article read:
As originally conceived, William Shatner was to appear in this episode as James T. Kirk. The planet in the episode would have been Neural, from TOS: "A Private Little War", with an aged Kirk returning to try to negotiate a peace on the planet. Shatner was either unwilling or unable to appear (probably unwilling, considering his disparaging remarks about The Next Generation during its first year), so the venue and character were changed.
Then later that got removed because it was all made up by someone, but you can still find it on the Talk page. https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:Too_Short_A_Season_(episode)#Kirk_in_this_episode?
I just remember reading it and thinking "Huh??"

Same with a discussion in one of the Trek reference books with the TNG actors. Someone says flippantly that William Shatner/Kirk will be guesting or joining the series in Season 8. As a 12 year old I thought that was going to be cool. :D
 
IIRC, the whole "Too Short a Season was originally going to be about Kirk" is just one of those urban legends that's never had a shred of evidence to back it up. Just like that story about how Trek XI was originally going to start with Nero destroying a classic-style Enterprise 1701 commanded by Robert April.
 
I always liked the idea that we never knew what happened to Kirk after that final log entry at the end of TUC. That his fate was just kinda left up to each persons own imagination with just little clues or offhand mentions here and there.

The fact that they brought him to the 24th century only to drop him off a cliff never sat right.
Yeah, exactly. I'm not entirely sure as to why we had to actually see him die. I figure it's the sort of thing of where the franchise just needed to put a rest to the character officially, but that's just if I had to guess.
 
I think this is a bit of a Schrodinger's cat situation - JTK was neither alive nor dead in TNG until Generations came about. TPTB left his status ambiguous throughout the show's run, which makes sense because they were still making movies with TOS crew through the 90s.. We saw an older McCoy was alive in TNG premiere, and Spock was still around in Season 5. But JTK, Uhura, Sulu, and Chekov are question marks. I think the closest we had to confirmation of JTK status in TNG was the response from Scotty upon hearing that Riker and Co were from the Enterprise

"The Enterprise?! I shoulda known – I'll bet Jim Kirk himself hauled the old gal outta mothballs to come lookin' for me!"

While there is nothing in his response to indicate JTK is alive or dead, we can certainly infer that Scotty in "Relics" is older than the Scotty we see in "Generations" as he is officially on his way to settle down for retirement. Being in the transporter on the Jenolan for ~ 78 years, if this happened prior to Generations, he would have been missing from those events. Some have come to explain it away as Scotty had a little memory loss from being in the transporter for decades.

It's a plot hole at worst, and have to chuck it up to the fact that Relics came before Generations, and ultimately JTK's fate was retroactively what it was come Generations in 1994.
There's a reason for this discrepancy. Ron Moore, one of the writers for Generations addressed this issue in an interview. Originally, Generations was supposed to have Kirk, Spock, and Bones in the beginning to send Kirk off. Nimoy, however, decided not to do the film, as he didn't think the script was good and that his character just didn't have a significant role to play (he was also angry/dissapointed/insulted that Rick Berman offered him the director's chair for GEN AFTER the script had been written and pre-production was done so there was nothing Nimoy could do about the script. Nimoy turned Berman down and, the supposition is, was consequently persona-non-grata at Paramount from that point on.). DeForest Kelly also decided not to do the film, following Nimoy's lead. So, Moore and Braga switched the Spock and McCoy lines to Scotty and Chekov and got Doohan and Koenig onboard (and, from a recent interview, Koenig was not happy at all about how Generations turned out). Moore was well aware of the discrepancy regarding Scotty's words in "Relics" regarding Kirk, but thought, in lieu of Spock or Bones, Scotty should be there at least, never mind the issue. Moore suggested that Scotty just had a senior moment or something in "Relics" to explain his words.

There wouldn't have been any issue if they'd used Sulu or Uhura instead, but I think that they needed or wanted someone besides Spock to figure out a solution and if you don't have Spock, Scotty was the guy that was needed.
 
Yeah, exactly. I'm not entirely sure as to why we had to actually see him die. I figure it's the sort of thing of where the franchise just needed to put a rest to the character officially, but that's just if I had to guess.
They didn't need to address Kirk's fate, they just wanted a TOS character of significance to pass the torch. They decided that character should be Kirk so that the two captains of the Enterprise could team up.

If Shanter had turned them down, I suspect that Kirk's fate might very well have been left unaddressed, although Shatner has said that Berman told him that they'd just say Kirk was dead anyway.
 
They didn't need to address Kirk's fate, they just wanted a TOS character of significance to pass the torch. They decided that character should be Kirk so that the two captains of the Enterprise could team up.

If Shanter had turned them down, I suspect that Kirk's fate might very well have been left unaddressed, although Shatner has said that Berman told him that they'd just say Kirk was dead anyway.
Reasonable.
 
There's only one way that any of this would make sense: That Kirk actually did die on the Enterprise-B like everyone thought he did, and that everything Picard experienced in the Nexus, including his visit with echo-Guinan and then Kirk, was all just part of the Nexus-induced fantasy, and that Picard is still in there.

Let's review this a little. On the Enterprise, Guinan tells Picard that the Nexus is so addictive that he'll never want to leave. The movie then later shows the complete opposite of this: That Picard and Kirk are able to leave it just fine after realizing that their respective fantasies are just that, fantasies. But what if the Nexus was just compensating for the fact that Picard's family fantasy wasn't working? What if it created the false Guinan in an attempt to fool him into thinking he could leave? And then the false Guinan leads Picard to believe that Kirk was also trapped in the Nexus (because Kirk was on Picard's mind when Riker mentioned the Enterprise-B to him earlier in the story), and creates a new fantasy where Picard meets Kirk, convinces him to leave the Nexus with him to go back to the real world to stop Soran (which doesn't actually happen), and completely glosses over the fact that Picard picks the absolute worst point in time to go back to? He then defeats Soran, saves the planet and his crew, and witnesses Kirk's death because the Nexus fantasy no longer needs him. Then in the next three films Picard becomes an action hero (like Kirk) despite this being totally out of character for him, fighting Borg, going back in time to meet Zefram Cochrane, kicking Son'a ass, and finding out he had an 18 year old evil clone all this time, and kicking his ass too. Not to mention his hijinks in Star Trek: Picard and ultimately finding out he has a son through the weirdest set of circumstances ever.

...Despite the fact that it's all just a Nexus-induced fantasy.

Unfortunately, of course, this would also mean that Soran was successful in destroying Veridian III, along with killing the entire Enterprise-D crew. And anything we see on screen after that, which includes over half of DS9 and all of VOY (especially Worf on DS9, Troi and Barclay on Voyager, etc.,) is also just part of Picard's Nexus fantasy, since all of the Ent-D crew are dead.

Mind blown?
No, my mind doesn't get blown easy.

Anyway, fans can have their cake and eat it too. Because of the possibility of alternate universes constantly branching off, fans can imagine that Generations happens in one alternate universes, and that none, some or all of later Star Trek happens in PIcard's dreams, or they can imagine there were many alternate universes where the Enterprise-D never got involved in Soren's plot and that none, some, or all of later Star Trek actually happened in real life and not in Picard's dreams in those alternate universes.

And fans can argue endlessly which of later Star Trek is Picard's fantasy dreams in the Nexus and which actually happens in alternate universes where Picard never got sucked into the nexus.
 
No, my mind doesn't get blown easy.

Anyway, fans can have their cake and eat it too. Because of the possibility of alternate universes constantly branching off, fans can imagine that Generations happens in one alternate universes, and that none, some or all of later Star Trek happens in PIcard's dreams, or they can imagine there were many alternate universes where the Enterprise-D never got involved in Soren's plot and that none, some, or all of later Star Trek actually happened in real life and not in Picard's dreams in those alternate universes.

And fans can argue endlessly which of later Star Trek is Picard's fantasy dreams in the Nexus and which actually happens in alternate universes where Picard never got sucked into the nexus.

I believe that Generations happened the way we saw it on screen. My hypothesis was just for fun.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top