So, pretty close to $25 million?They're not spending $25 million just to remove the mustache.
That's the rumored upper limit of the overall cost of all the reshoots being done.
The cost of removing the mustache is whatever Photoshop goes for these days![]()
It would be, but they're probably enjoying the idea of making a rival studio spend $25 million of their own money for something so silly.
I know, right? At first, I thought that it was just another internet meme or something that I hadn't seen yet. Like the "Sad Ben Affleck" and "Sad Kevin Feige" memes.This is REALLY a thing?![]()
Cavill is contractually obligated to Paramount not to shave it off until after MI:6 has wrapped.
Probably just to screw around with Warner, because they can.Why?
Because the mustache is needed for the character that Cavill plays in MI:6.Why?
They don't want to. And as they are a rival to WB, they have incentive not to.^ And with a multimillion dollar budget, MI:6 can't pony up for a decent fake 'stache?![]()
WB is spending $25 million to have the moustache removed in Post-Production all because Cavill is contractually obligated to Paramount not to shave it off until after MI:6 has wrapped. Wouldn't it just be easier for Paramount to give Cavill a fake moustache?
Why should Paramount do Warner Brothers a favor?
The director has implied that a fake 'stache wouldn't hold up to the intense stuntwork.^ And with a multimillion dollar budget, MI:6 can't pony up for a decent fake 'stache?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.