All this talk about EJO, I am now curious how ELO would do in a Star Trek film.
Would EJO's height have something to do with why they wouldn't cast him?
All this talk about EJO, I am now curious how ELO would do in a Star Trek film.
The other thing is that Christopher Lloyd has a very distinct voice. Even under all that Klingon makeup, you can easily tell from the voice that it is Lloyd.One interesting tidbit is that Night Court debuted about six months before STIII was released. Larroquette won an Emmy the next year for his role as Dan Fielding, but when STIII came out I don't think the public was as keyed to recognize Larroquette under makeup as they were Lloyd, who had been successful on Taxi. However, even in retrospect, Maltz doesn't come off at all like Dan Fielding, at least to me, so I think that's a testament to Larroquette actually playing his part (not that Lloyd wasn't playing his, though).
I personally don't think John Larroquette's voice is nearly as distinctive, and he used very different intonations as Dan Fielding than he did as Maltz. So I think that's one additional reason the general public may not have recognized him as easily as Lloyd.
I like Maltz, by the way.
It's too bad we didn't get to see Lloyd's clowning around between takes-- "Bring me some chocolate, Maltz!"
All this talk about EJO, I am now curious how ELO would do in a Star Trek film.
Would EJO's height have something to do with why they wouldn't cast him?
It was Nimoy who wanted Olmos, but Bennett overrode him with Lloyd (this is mentioned in the Okuda text-commmentary on the DVD).
And Lloyd is extremely menacing in the role, with screen-presence to burn, IMO.
I like Maltz, by the way.
It's too bad we didn't get to see Lloyd's clowning around between takes-- "Bring me some chocolate, Maltz!"
That is perhaps the worst impressionist I've ever seen.The other thing is that Christopher Lloyd has a very distinct voice. Even under all that Klingon makeup, you can easily tell from the voice that it is Lloyd.
Admiral Kirk, you don't want to give me the Genesis Device...
The thing which strikes me the most on reflection about Kruge is how the script seems to write the character as being sort of righteous -- he goes around talking about Starfleet developing secret weapons, about how the Klingons are going to save galactic peace from this new Federation threat called Genesis, etc -- which seems to suggest that the intention was for there to be this kind of ambiguity, perhaps a suggestion that maybe he is actually right and that he's got the best intentions of the galaxy in mind (taking into account of course that he's making an assumption that the top secret Genesis Project is some kind of a weapon). Of course, then we get Lloyd's performance, dripping as it is with exaggerated menace, and scenes like the one where he orders for a hostage to be killed to show he means business. You never really forget that he's the villain of the piece, contrary it seems to some of his dialogue.
I always saw Kruge as a Klingon in the tradition of Kor, Koloth and Kang: an antagonist with an understandable perspective, as opposed to a caricature of evil.
Definitely a contrast to post-TOS films. There is no way to sympathize with Soran, the Borg Queen, Ru'afo, Shinzon, Nero or Marcus. This is especially disappointing in the case of Shinzon, who, given the concept, certainly could have been a somewhat sympathetic character, but the film never gives him a fair shake.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.