• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

John Cho is the new Sulu?

^ or ride it like a cheetah ;)

I like this casting choice. he'll be ok. it's not like Sulu is a thespian's role anyway. none of these are, really.
 
SeamusShameless said:
Sulu was born in San Francisco. Hikaru is a Japanese word, while Sulu is not. It really doesn't matter that Cho is Korean, because Hikaru Sulu is an American.

By the 23rd C, what are the odds Sulu would be 100% Japanese, anyway? He could be ethnically mainly Korean (or Chinese or Vietnamese or whatever) by then. Surnames don't mean anything other than you have a remote male ancestor of that ethnicity. Japanese-Americans are not so weirdly racist that they refuse to marry outside their ethnicity - in fact, I can't think of ANY examples of Japanese-Americans I know who have married within their ethnicity, and I live in San Francisco in the 21st C. By the 23rd, all the purebreds will be extinct, so stop stressing about it! :rommie:
 
Ro_Laren said:
Emh said:
I'm only familiar with Cho in his guest appearance on House.

Same here. But I automatically think of American Pie and White Castle (or whatever its called) when I hear his name. I don't care for the genre of his films and therefore never really cared for the actor. But at least people know who he is (even if he isn't a A, B, or C list actor).

To be fair he was decent in the few dramatic roles he had.
 
Temis the Vorta said:
SeamusShameless said:
Sulu was born in San Francisco. Hikaru is a Japanese word, while Sulu is not. It really doesn't matter that Cho is Korean, because Hikaru Sulu is an American.

By the 23rd C, what are the odds Sulu would be 100% Japanese, anyway? He could be ethnically mainly Korean (or Chinese or Vietnamese or whatever) by then. Surnames don't mean anything other than you have a remote male ancestor of that ethnicity. Japanese-Americans are not so weirdly racist that they refuse to marry outside their ethnicity - in fact, I can't think of ANY examples of Japanese-Americans I know who have married within their ethnicity, and I live in San Francisco in the 21st C. By the 23rd, all the purebreds will be extinct, so stop stressing about it! :rommie:

Funny, though: wasn't the Japanese Hoshi Sato played by a Korean actress? As one who knows a bit about the region (I was an English teacher in Korea for six months about ten years ago--I can eat noodles with chopsticks!), I can safely say that the enmity between the Koreans and The Japanese is pretty deep--DS9 borrowed from it to flesh out the Bajoran enmity for Cardassians. Not a complaint, really--I actually find it somewhat heartening, though I wonder if a Korean national would.
 
Yes she was. And the Japanese Keiko O'Brien was played by Chinese-American actress Rosalind Chao. (Who played also played Klinger's Korean wife on M*A*S*H) And I think Harry Kim was of Korean ancestry but played by Chinese-American Garrett Wang. So its a Trek tradition.
 
I can safely say that the enmity between the Koreans and The Japanese is pretty deep

Then they need to get over it. Seriously, Star Trek is supposed to be opposed to such nonsense, not cater to it! :eek:

DS9 borrowed from it to flesh out the Bajoran enmity for Cardassians.

I thought the Cardies were Nazis and the Bajorans were either Russians or Jews. Or the Cardies are Israelis and the Bajorans were Palestinians. Or the Cardies are the Centauri and the Bajorans are the Narn (cue War Without End theme music ;)). But this is the first time I've heard the Japanese and Koreans dragged into it. I guess it's no worse - or better - than any other suggestion. I think this is like the Klingon thing - are they Russians? Vikings? Samurai? Spartans? All of the above?
 
Haha when I found out that they chose Cho to play Sulu, well I have a hard time picturing it.

What I do have an easy time picturing is Cho saying

"Oh man, what a MILF"
 
Temis the Vorta said:

DS9 borrowed from it to flesh out the Bajoran enmity for Cardassians.

I thought the Cardies were Nazis and the Bajorans were either Russians or Jews. Or the Cardies are Israelis and the Bajorans were Palestinians. Or the Cardies are the Centauri and the Bajorans are the Narn (cue War Without End theme music ;)). But this is the first time I've heard the Japanese and Koreans dragged into it. I guess it's no worse - or better - than any other suggestion. I think this is like the Klingon thing - are they Russians? Vikings? Samurai? Spartans? All of the above?

Temis I don't know if you remember it but we had this same argument in the Gen. Trek forum. I was the one who insisted that Cardassian occupation in many ways resemble more like the Japanese occupation of East Asia. While I only mentioned the Chinese however the Koreans also suffered a similar fate.

Ah I found the old thread.

http://www.trekbbs.com/threads/showflat.php?Number=7462260#Post7462260
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top