Sounds like more proof that the Vengeance is a lot tougher than the Enterprise-E to me.Oh yeah, I forgot about Abramsverse shields never working. Shields didn't really start working til the 24th century anyway. So yeah, Ent-E wins hands down. But probably take a lot of ammo, because it seems that there's nothing volatile enough on the whole damn ship to blow it up. (Seriously guys, 72 photon torpedoes detonating on the inside (INSIDE NO ARMOR) , at the engineering section should have blown that ship straight to Hell. No Warp core? No antimatter pods? No other torpedoes to detonate? )
Sounds like more proof that the Vengeance is a lot tougher than the Enterprise-E to me.Oh yeah, I forgot about Abramsverse shields never working. Shields didn't really start working til the 24th century anyway. So yeah, Ent-E wins hands down. But probably take a lot of ammo, because it seems that there's nothing volatile enough on the whole damn ship to blow it up. (Seriously guys, 72 photon torpedoes detonating on the inside (INSIDE NO ARMOR) , at the engineering section should have blown that ship straight to Hell. No Warp core? No antimatter pods? No other torpedoes to detonate? )![]()
Still off topic. Um The Enterprise E has more security personel. Punch a hole in the shields take out the skeleton crew BAM, Ent-E wins.
The superior automation of the USS Vengeance allows it to be operated by a skeleton crew, but that does not mean that it's limited to a skeleton crew. The Vengeance could probably carry 10,000 MACOs, and their equipment, if necessary.
Also, when you think about it, the automation of The Vengeance is extremely impressive. USS Voyager, a 350 meter long ship, needed a minimum crew of 100 to operate. The Vengeance, a 1450 meter long ship, only needs 1.
Bok rigged the 80-year-old (2280's) USS Stargazer to work entirely under Picard's voice direction in "The Battle"
Talking of computers, preliminary plans for the Vengeance bridge set says that flickering purple thing behind the captain's chair is the ship's advanced tactical "brain"
Bok rigged the 80-year-old (2280's) USS Stargazer to work entirely under Picard's voice direction in "The Battle"
Talking of computers, preliminary plans for the Vengeance bridge set says that flickering purple thing behind the captain's chair is the ship's advanced tactical "brain"
Yup, if GATT's neural hub can communicate with the entire Enterprise computer in real time, a fully automated device built specifically to coordinate the Vengeance systems could work too.
But as I keep saying, Vengeance's automation center looked massive, decks tall and very dense.
No, here's what we do know. The writers and producers don't know what the hell they are talking about when it comes to relating technologies. It is IMPOSSIBLE for them to have a ship more powerful than a LATE 24TH CENTURY WARSHIP. NO WAY IN HELL. It only shows the stupidity and lack of intelligence of the people in charge.
Lets see people working with that Radio Tube, warehouse sized calculator and reverse engineer a Windows 7 Dell Inspiron 560 and see how long it takes them to reverse engineer it. They wouldn't know where to begin.
It's an unfair comparison, because real-life technology has advanced infinitely more in a hundred years than Star Trek's tech has in the 225 years of on-screen canon. The NX-01 went to warp 5, Voyager goes to warp 9.975. One has holodecks, the other hasn't. What else?The technology is still 100 years behind the Enterprise E. No matter how you cut it Lets see a 1985 frigate take on 1885 warship...that warship aint gonna touch the frigate nd the warship aint gonn know what it them.....hell a 1985 freighter would waste a 1885 warship...just ram the damn thing.
It's an unfair comparison, because real-life technology has advanced infinitely more in a hundred years than Star Trek's tech has in the 225 years of on-screen canon. The NX-01 went to warp 5, Voyager goes to warp 9.975. One has holodecks, the other hasn't. What else?The technology is still 100 years behind the Enterprise E. No matter how you cut it Lets see a 1985 frigate take on 1885 warship...that warship aint gonna touch the frigate nd the warship aint gonn know what it them.....hell a 1985 freighter would waste a 1885 warship...just ram the damn thing.
It's an unfair comparison, because real-life technology has advanced infinitely more in a hundred years than Star Trek's tech has in the 225 years of on-screen canon. The NX-01 went to warp 5, Voyager goes to warp 9.975. One has holodecks, the other hasn't. What else?
^Still more technological advancement happened in that time than in the entire Trekverse.
^Still more technological advancement happened in that time than in the entire Trekverse.
You're comparing real technological advances with the projections of unimaginative writers (who themselves are probably not familiar with the advances in technology over the last few centuries)?
It's an unfair comparison, because real-life technology has advanced infinitely more in a hundred years than Star Trek's tech has in the 225 years of on-screen canon. The NX-01 went to warp 5, Voyager goes to warp 9.975. One has holodecks, the other hasn't. What else?The technology is still 100 years behind the Enterprise E. No matter how you cut it Lets see a 1985 frigate take on 1885 warship...that warship aint gonna touch the frigate nd the warship aint gonn know what it them.....hell a 1985 freighter would waste a 1885 warship...just ram the damn thing.
Unless I'm misremembering the technological development, a warship from 1785 would do a pretty fair job trashing a warship from 1685 too.
Here's a diagram a fan must have done (found it online, uncertain of exact providence before I stored it on my photobucket): it shows Kelvin and other Abrams ships alongside "Prime" 23rd Century designs.
![]()
Now this:
![]()
...I finally got a look at the recent book Federation: The First 150 Years and the author David Goodman actually named the Baton Rogue class as a sister ship to the Einstein class (Kelvin type) in the 2230's! Captain April served aboard both types of ships before taking command of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701 in 2245.Take a look at this, the Baton Rouge class from the 1980 Star Trek Spaceflight Chonology book (and appearing in several comics and novels of the era - in one case the USS Saladin of that class was James Kirk's command prior to the Enterprise). That is why the Kelvin looks 100% like a pre-TOS ship to me - they could be sister ships, easy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.