That's the thing though, isn't it? The mold was set TNG-wise between the Fall of Saigon and the Invasion of Kuwait, when—culturally in the mainstream—the military was viewed with disdain in the US.I mean, if the term "military " wasn't treated with such disdain these arguments would go easier.
That's the thing though, isn't it? The mold was set TNG-wise between the Fall of Saigon and the Invasion of Kuwait, when—culturally in the mainstream—the military was viewed with disdain in the US.
I also asked ChatGPT, but at the end it just said it's a matter of perspective.
Guess that's why it pains me. My uncle was at the fall of the embassy at Saigon and was treated poorly when he got home.That's the thing though, isn't it? The mold was set TNG-wise between the Fall of Saigon and the Invasion of Kuwait, when—culturally in the mainstream—the military was viewed with disdain in the US.
Psh. I just used the term that is commonly used for that day in 1975. The day that marked the end of the Vietnamese War.Saigon didn’t fall. It stood up, kicked the fucking invaders out and still stands today.
Yeah, that was the point of my post. No respect for those that served or those that were serving.Guess that's why it pains me. My uncle was at the fall of the embassy at Saigon and was treated poorly when he got home.
Psh. I just used the term that is commonly used for that day in 1975. The day that marked the end of the Vietnamese War.
This was something that I would debate with my uncle about after I had read "Starship Troopers" and done research in college about the very low participation rate of voting in the United States (at the time it was roughly a 1/3). I quite liked the idea of some sort of social service, note just military but other forms of federal service, that provided for participation in the political process. While maybe not for voting, but at least for more political leadership type roles within a country to at least show that service to the country and that sense of duty carry weight when making decisions.I've felt many times that a requirement to be a politician should be to have served in one of the branches. We might end up with politicians that are not as self-serving and corrupt. (Of course, this doesn't guarantee it. But I'd wager that having politicans with that kind of background, they'd more likely actually serve the people and not just serve a party or a corporation because they understand things like duty and service are not just simply words or a slogan.)
Joy to the Trek, the military thread is come.....Oh, joy.
This is back.
And where does he keep his money....I had a definitive answer for this question, but I got sidetracked thinking about whether or not Jellico was a good Captain or not, and if he would have murdered Tuvix.
Not realistic or going to happen but political requirements, have served in combat, have served in the armed forces or whenever combat service is required, all politicians' children over 18 will be called up. And must retire from politics at the age of 60.I've felt many times that a requirement to be a politician should be to have served in one of the branches. We might end up with politicians that are not as self-serving and corrupt.
Or Black April. I guess it depends on which Vietnamese you talk to.The Vietnamese call it the Liberation of Saigon, because that’s exactly what it was.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.