• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is Spock going to be the first Vulcan in Starfleet?

I guess I have a thin skin due to the huge number of snide comments regarding my country in these boards...
And I think Sarko is moving towards reintegration into the NATO.
 
I guess I have a thin skin due to the huge number of snide comments regarding my country in these boards...
And I think Sarko is moving towards reintegration into the NATO.
My family can be traced back to a small town in the Loire region and my family name is the same as the castle's name there (I don't wish to use my real name, so I'll stop there).

I did not want to turn this into a TNZ style political discussion (and, for the record, I have no love for France-bashers).

In any event, my use of France was to provide a precedent for the notion that Vulcan could be part of the Federation but not necessarily integrated into Starfleet.
 
I've never been a fan of the notion of Spock being the first Vulcan in Starfleet. Besides the matter of the USS Intrepid, the idea that a founding member of the Federation didn't have at least a few representatives in Starfleet for over a hundred years is really pushing it.

I agree with this.

If your "nation" were to join a collective of nations, wouldn't your people want to somehow be involved in the main defensive and exploratory body for that collective? Don't you think that your government would insist on your people being given a number of slots to ensure a fair and equitable process within that body?

~String

If that is so, where was the Starfleet presence on Vulcan? There was such a lack that Kirk and co. had to repair their captured Klingon ship to go back to Earth to stand trial in The Voyage Home. And the fact there were no Starfleet authorities--Vulcan or otherwise--stationed on Vulcan to arrest Kirk and his crew upon their arrival in Search for Spock.

It's almost like 23rd Century Vulcan completely shunned Starfleet, perhaps for political or ethical reasons.

I don't know. But it does seem totally obsurd that one of the key, founding members of the UFP doesn't have a major star base. This is a massive plot oversight, IMHO.

They're the France of Starfleet?

Quit your bullshit, ok? Thanks.

I thought it was funny. Even apropos.

~String
 
To be sure, "Immunity Syndrome" only establishes the Intrepid as a "starship" that has stopped answering hails, not as a Starfleet or Federation vessel, or one that would do Starfleet's bidding.

To be fair, the name Intrepid sounds a bit emotional to be a name for a Vulcan ship anyway...

It was actually spelled the N. T'Repid.
 
To be fair, the name Intrepid sounds a bit emotional to be a name for a Vulcan ship anyway...
At first I thought so, too, and was quite displeased with the choice.

But if you look closely at the meaning of the word, it derives from Latin "intrepidus", meaning "not anxious" or "not afraid", i.e. rejecting a negative emotion of fear (in context, fear of the unknown), a very Vulcan position to have.

Maybe the emotional baggage we get from the name is just a case of us human over-translating its meaning, who would have best translated as "unfazed" or "imperturbable" (but that would have been shitty starship names, tho).
 
Maybe the emotional baggage we get from the name is just a case of us human over-translating its meaning, who would have best translated as "unfazed" or "imperturbable" (but that would have been shitty starship names, tho).
The latter sounds like a name Thomas Pynchon would give to one of the British warships which often turn up in his books: HMS Imperturbable.

Probably no Vulcans in the 18th- or 19th-century Royal Navy, though.
 
I've never been a fan of the notion of Spock being the first Vulcan in Starfleet. Besides the matter of the USS Intrepid, the idea that a founding member of the Federation didn't have at least a few representatives in Starfleet for over a hundred years is really pushing it.

I agree with this.

If your "nation" were to join a collective of nations, wouldn't your people want to somehow be involved in the main defensive and exploratory body for that collective? Don't you think that your government would insist on your people being given a number of slots to ensure a fair and equitable process within that body?

~String

If that is so, where was the Starfleet presence on Vulcan? There was such a lack that Kirk and co. had to repair their captured Klingon ship to go back to Earth to stand trial in The Voyage Home. And the fact there were no Starfleet authorities--Vulcan or otherwise--stationed on Vulcan to arrest Kirk and his crew upon their arrival in Search for Spock.

It's almost like 23rd Century Vulcan completely shunned Starfleet, perhaps for political or ethical reasons.
All we know is that Kirks crew landed on Vulcan. What happened behind the scenes with Starfleet, the UFP and VUlcan is unknown. We've no idea what deals might have been struck regarding Kirk and his crew and their ship. With people of T'Pau and Sarek's status in Kirk's corner I'm sure the Vulcans were dealing from a position of power.
 
Maybe the emotional baggage we get from the name is just a case of us human over-translating its meaning, who would have best translated as "unfazed" or "imperturbable" (but that would have been shitty starship names, tho).
The latter sounds like a name Thomas Pynchon would give to one of the British warships which often turn up in his books: HMS Imperturbable.

Probably no Vulcans in the 18th- or 19th-century Royal Navy, though.
Oh, I wouldn't be so sure. The Vulcans seem to be fond of speaking the Queen's English, for one thing. ;)
 
There is ZERO onscreen evidence that Spock was the first Vulcan in Starfleet. As a matter of fact, we already know T'Pol was.

I thought T'Pol served in Earth Starfleet, before the founding of the Federation. I can't remember the reference (it might have been from memory-alpha.org) but I remember Earth Starfleet and UFP Starfleet weren't the same entity.
That was never indicated on the show, nor was it the intent of the makers. It was purely a fan notion thought up on the Flare board and propogated here to "reconcile" the initially-perceived "error" of Starfleet existing prior to the UFP, which was really no error at all.

To be sure, "Immunity Syndrome" only establishes the Intrepid as a "starship" that has stopped answering hails, not as a Starfleet or Federation vessel, or one that would do Starfleet's bidding. While few other vessels in TOS are called "starship", and all of those are associated with the Federation somehow, the other shows tend to use the term "starship" for foreign vessels as well. And ENT uses it that way, too, establishing a "precedent"...
The Intrepid is a Starfleet ship as per "Court Martial" (TOS).
 
But it does seem totally obsurd that one of the key, founding members of the UFP doesn't have a major star base. This is a massive plot oversight, IMHO.

I don't see why. Starfleet isn't tasked with maintaining internal order, and since Vulcan presumably isn't anywhere near the Federation's border, there's no particular reason why there should be a starbase there.
 
I always thought starbases were more for refueling, and to serve as embassies and home bases, than for border security. I think each major city in the US has some kind of base somewhere. As such, I'd think Vulcan would surely have a starbase. I suspect Andor would as well, and the other major players in the UFP. Perhaps they would consolidate some of them into Earth-based facilities by the 24th century or they might even expand the existing ones by then, but I think that at some point each of those worlds would have a major base.
 
Given the relative proximity of Vulcan, Earth, and Andor, all three could be served by a starbase operating roughly equi-distant from each in deep space, with local administrative functions being handled by smaller shore based outposts on each planet. Ditto military security - each planet might operate its own local defence forces in close coordination with Starfleet.
 
But it does seem totally obsurd that one of the key, founding members of the UFP doesn't have a major star base. This is a massive plot oversight, IMHO.

I don't see why. Starfleet isn't tasked with maintaining internal order, and since Vulcan presumably isn't anywhere near the Federation's border, there's no particular reason why there should be a starbase there.

And of course Vulcan could have its own fleet, for use within its own system. A Federation member world doesn't *completely* lose its own military; it can keep a detachment for home use.
 
Given the relative proximity of Vulcan, Earth, and Andor, all three could be served by a starbase operating roughly equi-distant from each in deep space, with local administrative functions being handled by smaller shore based outposts on each planet. Ditto military security - each planet might operate its own local defence forces in close coordination with Starfleet.
That doesn't seem likely since there's at least a big space dock, orbital offices, and the construction/repair docks as seen in TMP, "All Good Things...", etc. all in orbit of Earth. But in a way, each Federation planet is probably by definition a starbase anyway, though I suppose we're talking specifically about orbital facilities. If we, as a pre-warp planet already have an ISS and countless telecomm satellites, I'm sure that by the 23rd century it'll be pretty standard for post-warp planets to have facilities not unlike the space dock in orbit as a matter of course.
 
But it does seem totally obsurd that one of the key, founding members of the UFP doesn't have a major star base. This is a massive plot oversight, IMHO.

I don't see why. Starfleet isn't tasked with maintaining internal order, and since Vulcan presumably isn't anywhere near the Federation's border, there's no particular reason why there should be a starbase there.

And of course Vulcan could have its own fleet, for use within its own system. A Federation member world doesn't *completely* lose its own military; it can keep a detachment for home use.

I don't think so--Deep Space Nine made mention of the Bajoran Militia being absorbed into Starfleet following their joining the Federation. In TNG, the Benzite Ensign Mendon was on exchange serving on the Enterprise-D but he was wearing a Starfleet uniform. His planet was a Federation member.

These signs point to Starfleet being the primary military force of Federation member worlds. Different ships seem to represent different member worlds--ships like the Intrepid, Hera and T'Kumbra for Vulcan; Mendon also mentioned Benzite Starfleet ships having different procedures and protocols; and lastly due to TV budgetary constrictions, we have seen mostly ships that are representative of Earth.

Now that said, we have also seen umpteen non-military vessels belonging to their own unique fleets, like the Vulcan Science Directorate and many Human merchant and transport vessels. Perhaps these vessels can be called into a deputized form of military service in emergencies.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top