Because really all he did was pull a trigger. (But he had great timing!)
And he had to be saved a couple of times bij Kenobi, Solo and his wingmans gave their lives for him
Because really all he did was pull a trigger. (But he had great timing!)
totally different from Luke.
You couple all the mary sue aspects of her character (that she knows how to fly, wield a lightsaber, knows all the languages) with the fact that we no nothing about the background of the character.. coupled with the fact that we don't know what DRIVES the character (why is she doing the right thing, except because the writers need her to) and those three elements combined make her a mary sue .. and the fourth element is that the audience is detached from her, never truly worried about her or surprised when she succeeds.
Let's not forget how the BTS aspects filter in.. this is Disney, this is Kathleen "all I want to talk about is fierce strong female characters, writers and directors" Kennedy
You managed to read it all?!?This is gibberish.
This is gibberish.
Same as Luke.that she knows how to fly
She demonstrates more combat capability than Luke does with fighting off thugs. She already demonstrates combat competency with a melee weapon.wield a lightsaber
She works with machines and in a diverse population. Seems reasonable.knows all the languages
A survivalist left abandoned on a frontier world, forced to scavenge in order to live.we no nothing about the background of the character
A desire to belong.we don't know what DRIVES the character
Incorrect, as demonstrated repeatedly in this thread.audience is detached from her
Hyperbole. That isn't all that she talks about. Also, do Abrams' and Arndt also get the same BTS critique? No?Let's not forget how the BTS aspects filter in.. this is Disney, this is Kathleen "all I want to talk about is fierce strong female characters, writers and directors" Kennedy
Until they do let's keep the discussion around the arguments.Moderators should seriously consider banning the use of this term because, although it once had a clear and precise meaning, it is now only synonymous with sexist crap.
But he used to bull'seye womp rats in his T-sixteen back home! Because even IRL there is absolutely no difference between a bi-plane and a F-35!Let's break this down...
Same as Luke.
As demonstrated in Independence Day, any ol' crop duster can take out a giant alien ship in a modern fighter plane. It's totally logical, as long as a white male does it.But he used to bull'seye womp rats in his T-sixteen back home! Because even IRL there is absolutely no difference between a bi-plane and a F-35!
Well, it's obvious: suspension of disbelief can't be applied to female characters. I mean, a woman who isn't a damsel in distress or the main character's love interest? What's this nonsense?!?As demonstrated in Independence Day, any ol' crop duster can take out a giant alien ship in a modern fighter plane. It's totally logical, as long as a white male does it.
I think I read somewhere that the original Mary Sue story was actually a parody of those types of characters, not an actual serious story.So, you are totally making up the definition of Mary Sue and decided that it applies to Rey..?
Look, now I don't have time to refute every single point you made, but I think this suffices
Knowing nothing about the background of the character has never been one of the definitions of "Mary Sue".
This is the original short story from which the term was coined:
We know from this story a lot about the background of this particular character (even her ancestry).
So please, just stop using that term, because,
I quoted the original story, you can judge for yourself.I think I read somewhere that the original Mary Sue story was actually a parody of those types of characters, not an actual serious story.
The fact that Rey walks onto the Falcon and acts like she knows her way around a cockpit tells me that she's flown ships before. I don't need the dialog telling me what ship she's flown in the past.
Besides, I thought TV shows/movies were supposed to "show not tell" because they are a visual medium?
This is my biggest contention regarding the whole argument. What evidence we have is presented on screen in the visuals not in dialog. That's how films work. How do we know Anakin is great at podracing? We watch him do it. How is Luke a good pilot? We watch him do it. Same thing with Rey.Besides, I thought TV shows/movies were supposed to "show not tell" because they are a visual medium?
Totally took me out of the movie.I'm still wondering how Luke managed to retrieve his light saber at the beginning of Empire with no training?
Totally took me out of the movie.
I think I read somewhere that the original Mary Sue story was actually a parody of those types of characters, not an actual serious story.
It's a joke...I do thatIt didn't for me. But for the sequel trilogy folks who question every single choice made with regard to Rey's character, I think it is a fair question to ask. Kenobi was dead, Luke hadn't met Yoda yet, we aren't given any information about how he would come about such a power with no training.
That pretty much sums it up. Rey's skills are on display from the word go, and more overtly than Anakin or Luke at similar moments in the films.So last night I re watched TFA and paid attention to the whole pilot thing.
There are at least three occasions where Rey states explicitly she has piloting experience and her qualms about the Falcon are that it is likely not space worthy. Rey and Finn initially head for a completely different ship, a speeder which is blown up before they can get there.
She struggles at first with the unfamiliar cockpit and actually complains about being alone in a vessel which requires a co pilot for proper operation, before finding her feet and flying around a familiar landscape within the atmosphere having already pointed out to Finn where the cannons are.
Where on earth does any of this leave us in any doubt that she is a pilot? Why would we require further backstory to explain this commonplace skill she has repeatedly stated she possesses? Do we also need to ask how she came to be ale to cook her own dinner?
I don't ask how it is characters in contemporary settings learnt to drive cars, use mobile phones or send emails, they are commonplace skills in the modern world and don't requires any special mention other than very possibly the simple fact of their presence.
Likewise Rey is living in a setting where mechanical and piloting skills are commonplace, skills she both references and demonstrates on numerous occasions (including using a speeder earlier on in the film). There's no reason to ask the question, much less make an issue out of it as a storytelling flaw.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.