Yes, but he did it for a very specific reason. He even states his reasoning to Decker. He doesn't want to do anything that could be misinterpreted as being hostile. He's afraid raising shields will be misinterpreted and provoke V'Ger into a response.In TMP Kirk fought against raising shields when approaching V-Ger.
They actually didn't know how many Klingons were beaming over, so they could easily have been beaming into a bad situation (outnumbered) either way. But at least on the planet, they wouldn't be exactly where Kruge could use his ship to contain them.I think Kruge and Maltz would have detected Kirk and the gang beaming onto their ship and would have taken steps (such as cutting off life-support at their location) to neutralize them before they got very far (Kirk tried to secretly beam aboard a Romulan ship in "The Enterprise Incident" but was discovered almost immediately--thankfully, he was disguised as a Romulan at the time).I'm talking about when the Klingons beamed over, if they could beam to Enterprise, I'm sure we could have beamed there at the same time instead of going down to Genesis.
Oh it wouldn't be a stealthy move, more one of 'well we know most of them are beaming over here.. let's swap places with their crew in the transporter, overpower the few that are there and use their ship to rescue our people down there'
I do think Kirk's priority was to rescue Saavik and Spock during the chaos caused by the destruction of the Enterprise. I think he also knew Klingons well enough that Kruge would come down to the planet after him (and sure enough, he did). Kirk was also banking on Kruge wanting to take him and his crew as prisoners to obtain the secrets of Genesis. Kirk was undeniably taking a risk with the Klingons, but then Kirk has often taken risks that perhaps no one else would have been crazy enough to even consider.Certainly as good a plan as let's beam down onto a dying planet, with no real assurance that we can get off the planet.
Why is it difficult to swallow? It is very clearly an extrapolation from modern naval practices dealing with unfamiliar ships.
You have no idea what their intent is. Now if they weren't coming near you, you could say "well you can afford to be a little relaxed," but in this case they were coming at them with no contact established. Kirk himself said it was "damn peculiar," which indicates caution is warranted.
And all that doesn't even include the message that they'd already gotten from Regula I, which indicated potential trouble as Kirk pointed out when offering Spock command back.
I don't know where you get the idea that raising shields is considered something to be avoided even in times of war.
The regulation clearly called for the raising of shields, and it was being pointed out to him while the ship was approaching.
Saavik: "Sir, may I quote General Order Twelve: 'On the approach of any vessel, when communications have not been established-"
Spock: "Lieutenant, the Admiral is well aware of the regulations."
Saavik: "Aye, Sir."
But the precedent is clear and indeed basically unanimous that Starfleet does not deal with unfamiliar ships that way. Raising of shields is a bad move, something all captains avoid like plague, for some unknown but obviously pressing reason. So, it's not difficult to swallow if you haven't seen Star Trek before - but it's about as alien to that show as sneaking up to a criminal with your cruiser's sirens wailing and lights flashing would be in a cop show.Why is it difficult to swallow? It is very clearly an extrapolation from modern naval practices dealing with unfamiliar ships.
Well, the obvious assumption here would be that these fellow Starfleeters are in trouble. In which case raised shields might prevent Kirk from helping them.You have no idea what their intent is. Now if they weren't coming near you, you could say "well you can afford to be a little relaxed," but in this case they were coming at them with no contact established. Kirk himself said it was "damn peculiar," which indicates caution is warranted.
How would that make fellow Starfleet vessels suspect?
From the fact that Kirk didn't raise them when war was declared in "Errand of Mercy"?
Sisko never sailed with his shields up during the Dominion War, either, until the very last minute, typically when unpleasantries had already been exchanged with the enemy commander.
That's just an urban myth. We have no idea what the regulation called for, and we thus have no idea whether Kirk followed the regulation or not.The regulation clearly called for the raising of shields, and it was being pointed out to him while the ship was approaching.
The entire dialogue referring to that regulation is here:
For all we know, GO12 calls for keeping on trying to hail the vessel. And if anything, Kirk overreacted by sounding yellow alert.Saavik: "Sir, may I quote General Order Twelve: 'On the approach of any vessel, when communications have not been established-"
Spock: "Lieutenant, the Admiral is well aware of the regulations."
Saavik: "Aye, Sir."
Timo Saloniemi
But then, on top of that, Kirk ignores multiple warning signs and persists in keeping the shields down. First, Reliant transmits an explanation for their radio silence, which Spock's sensors determine to be a lie. No response from Kirk. Then Reliant raises her shields, which Spock detects and reports. Again, no response from Kirk. It is not until Reliant is literally locking phasers on the Enterprise that Kirk reacts and orders shields raised. At that point, of course, it is too late.
What Kirk demonstrated there was absolutely gross incompetence.
I see what you're saying, but I still disagree. Even if the passage of time is shorter than what we perceive it as on-screen, Kirk could have ordered shields raised the moment Spock determined Reliant was lying. He could have ordered shields raised the moment Spock finished his sentence reporting that Reliant's shields were going up. He didn't. He waited until after the report that phasers were being locked.I think what makes it seem that way is the inter-cutting between scenes on the two ships. It makes it seem like it takes longer for Kirk to react than it does, when actually it's all happening at once.
He made the big mistake when he didn't raise his shields. The rest happened in the space of only a few seconds.
implies even though it does not outright say that shields should be raised on the approach of any vessel without established communications. A sensible precaution, regardless of any precedent for not raising shields (perhaps that stupid practice of not raising shields in the past in potentially dangerous situations is what prompted the regulation in the first place - clearly it's there for a reason).
They actually didn't know how many Klingons were beaming over, so they could easily have been beaming into a bad situation (outnumbered) either way. But at least on the planet, they wouldn't be exactly where Kruge could use his ship to contain them.I think Kruge and Maltz would have detected Kirk and the gang beaming onto their ship and would have taken steps (such as cutting off life-support at their location) to neutralize them before they got very far (Kirk tried to secretly beam aboard a Romulan ship in "The Enterprise Incident" but was discovered almost immediately--thankfully, he was disguised as a Romulan at the time).
Oh it wouldn't be a stealthy move, more one of 'well we know most of them are beaming over here.. let's swap places with their crew in the transporter, overpower the few that are there and use their ship to rescue our people down there'I do think Kirk's priority was to rescue Saavik and Spock during the chaos caused by the destruction of the Enterprise. I think he also knew Klingons well enough that Kruge would come down to the planet after him (and sure enough, he did). Kirk was also banking on Kruge wanting to take him and his crew as prisoners to obtain the secrets of Genesis. Kirk was undeniably taking a risk with the Klingons, but then Kirk has often taken risks that perhaps no one else would have been crazy enough to even consider.Certainly as good a plan as let's beam down onto a dying planet, with no real assurance that we can get off the planet.
Oh, I disagree with that. I definitely think Kirk was banking on the Klingons acting a certain way. Part of it was indeed his intuition, while part of it was also luck--but then Kirk tends to rely on both.They actually didn't know how many Klingons were beaming over, so they could easily have been beaming into a bad situation (outnumbered) either way. But at least on the planet, they wouldn't be exactly where Kruge could use his ship to contain them.Oh it wouldn't be a stealthy move, more one of 'well we know most of them are beaming over here.. let's swap places with their crew in the transporter, overpower the few that are there and use their ship to rescue our people down there'I do think Kirk's priority was to rescue Saavik and Spock during the chaos caused by the destruction of the Enterprise. I think he also knew Klingons well enough that Kruge would come down to the planet after him (and sure enough, he did). Kirk was also banking on Kruge wanting to take him and his crew as prisoners to obtain the secrets of Genesis. Kirk was undeniably taking a risk with the Klingons, but then Kirk has often taken risks that perhaps no one else would have been crazy enough to even consider.Certainly as good a plan as let's beam down onto a dying planet, with no real assurance that we can get off the planet.
They make it a point to show that Kirk is thinking about how many are coming over to board, and what the strategy is. And just because the writers chose to have Kruge come down to the surface doesn't mean, objectively, that it was some intuition that Kirk had that he would, and that he would speak enough Klingon to say 'beam me up' to Maltz.
I actually don't think they would have gotten very far on the Klingon ship. If I was Kruge, the moment Kirk and the gang were detected (which I think would have been instantly if there was an intruder alert system), I'd seal off the bulkheads and cut off life support to their location.Look, I know what you are saying, and it makes for a fun movie, I love III, but going to the Klingon ship was the smarter move.
And I thought Kirk knowing how to say "beam me up" in Klingon was a result of him hearing Kruge say it earlier when he had McCoy, Spock, etc, beamed up.
Why keep doing this circular reasoning? The contents of the regulation were unknown and remain unknown.implies even though it does not outright say that shields should be raised on the approach of any vessel without established communications. A sensible precaution, regardless of any precedent for not raising shields (perhaps that stupid practice of not raising shields in the past in potentially dangerous situations is what prompted the regulation in the first place - clearly it's there for a reason).
The Lantree and the Braittain both sent out distress signals before the Enterprise-D went out to find them. Both were found adrift with no or limited life signs aboard.Starfleet keeps on not raising shields long after this incident (Picard doesn't treat the Lantree or the Brattain with any greater caution in this respect). And Kirk is never considered to have violated either regulations or Starfleet good practices - he just chides himself for not having had his usual extra edge.
Absurd except when Carol Marcus said it was Starfleet trying to take Genesis away from them. Except when Starfleet says Kirk's ship is the only one in the quadrant and yet when he shows up at Regula Reliant is there too. Except when the Reliant sends voice messages about their communications being down and lies about the reason they are down.And there's fairly little reason to think it was a violation of common sense, either, as the idea of a hostile Starfleet vessel would be utterly absurd at this point of Starfleet history. Things like that just don't happen in Kirk's universe.
I see what you're saying, but I still disagree. Even if the passage of time is shorter than what we perceive it as on-screen, Kirk could have ordered shields raised the moment Spock determined Reliant was lying. He could have ordered shields raised the moment Spock finished his sentence reporting that Reliant's shields were going up. He didn't. He waited until after the report that phasers were being locked.
Why keep doing this circular reasoning? The contents of the regulation were unknown and remain unknown. Starfleet keeps on not raising shields long after this incident (Picard doesn't treat the Lantree or the Brattain with any greater caution in this respect). And Kirk is never considered to have violated either regulations or Starfleet good practices - he just chides himself for not having had his usual extra edge.implies even though it does not outright say that shields should be raised on the approach of any vessel without established communications. A sensible precaution, regardless of any precedent for not raising shields (perhaps that stupid practice of not raising shields in the past in potentially dangerous situations is what prompted the regulation in the first place - clearly it's there for a reason).
Not raising shields was a wrong decision here. There's no reason to think it was a violation of regulations, though. And there's fairly little reason to think it was a violation of common sense, either, as the idea of a hostile Starfleet vessel would be utterly absurd at this point of Starfleet history. Things like that just don't happen in Kirk's universe.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.