• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is Discovery the most polarizing Trek property ever?

Most of the mainstream reviews I've seen have been largely positive. As BIllJ said, never confuse angry voices on the internet with the real world.

Yep, and I'm definitely not a fan of the show so far. Just an angry internet voice! :eek:
 
Most of the mainstream reviews I've seen have been largely positive. As BIllJ said, never confuse angry voices on the internet with the real world.

Reviews have been way more positive than the aggregate audience response that sites like Rotten Tomatoes and MetaCritic do in addition. Audience response matters more, and to the extent it can be measured outside of trekkie sites it's pretty tepid.

No. Polarizing implies that the split in opinion is roughly equal. Outside of this subforum, no one seems to like STD.

Well, again, "most people" don't notice STD. Among those who do, it's pretty polarizing.
 
I am polarized in my own mind on Discovery. There's a lot about the show I REALLY like. There are also plenty of serious flaws (not from the angle of adherence to what Trek is "supposed" to be, just in their own storytelling -- the plotting is so awkward, I can always feel the hand of the writer clumsily moving the pieces around).

I think we're close enough to the end that I can say I'll never view Disco year 1 as a great season of television, but, assuming the kinks get worked out in future years, I could certainly regard it as equivalent to the first seasons of TNG or DS9 -- a rough start, but with tons of good ideas and abundant potential evident from the jump.

Literally could not give a single flying fuck about CBS's rights to Star Trek. If I want to make a Star Trek Fan Film, I will make one, and make money off it, and send a picture of my middle finger to CBS.

And I'm sure we all cannot wait to see it.

I think social media tends to magnify the voice of the hard-liners. And my experience is that the hate against the new movies has been more venomous than what DSC is getting.

So, so true.

I just wish that people would take the time to ponder that, if you hate something so much, why participate? Who needs that stress?

And a very good question. Just don't ask me to ponder it Thursday nights after "Gotham" comes back. I'll be busy watching the new episodes as they air live (no DVR delay here!) and tearing my hair out and screaming at the TV about all the ways this irredeemably terrible garbage show trashes my beloved Bat-mythos!!!!!! :censored: :klingon::brickwall::barf::barf2::wtf::thumbdown:

:techman:
 
Last edited:
I think we're close enough to the end that I can say I'll never view Disco year 1 as a great season of television, but, assuming the kinks get worked out in future years, I could certainly regard it as equivalent to the first seasons of TNG or DS9 -- a rough start, but with tons of good ideas and abundant potential evident from the jump.

They definitely need to move away from the fanwank for season two. It is like they are constantly jumping up and down going "look! see! it's Star Trek! I tell ya!"
 
They definitely need to move away from the fanwank for season two. It is like they are constantly jumping up and down going "look! see! it's Star Trek! I tell ya!"

There's definitely something a little schizoid in the intersection of content and style, on the show. If they want to really break ground and attract a new audience for Trek they'll need to up the writing game a lot and take some storytelling chances. One big risk, obviously, being that they'll simply alienate more of the long-time audience without any guarantee that they'll break out into the general public consciousness. They're trying too hard to have it both ways right now, which may be a result of all the behind-the-scenes jerking around and repurposing of elements.

The vast majority of those eyeballs locked onto HBO's Game of Thrones had never read the name "George R.R. Martin."
 
Yes, but one person's "in line with canon" may be another's "fanwank."

I'm of the opinion they should've defined Discovery as its own thing first, gave it an identity then circled around and done the fan service type stuff.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top