I think Foreman is better. Ok stick with me here for a second, I know Ali beat George's butt in the Rumble in the Jungle. But I think why people buy into the image of Cassius Marcellus Clay Jr is because of his style, his personality, and his life story not his boxing record. His loud spoken opinions, his part as social activist, his journey to find Islam and his story for being thrown in jail for not going to Vietnam and other events in his life. yes he had great style, fanatatsic footwork and the best speed a heavy weight has ever seen. However the fact people Ken Norton, and bully boy Joe Frazier were able to dominate him and the fact Ali lacked a powerful punch means he would have gone through serious trouble if Ali had to face an average bad boy like Mike Tyson. Foreman didn't have style, his boxing style was almost ugly but he was extremely powerful and workman like. Foreman showed how to beat smokin Joe Frazier knock him out and send his butt backwards through the ropes and out of the ring. Mohammed Ali wanted to avoid fighting a great Cuban champ like Teófilo Stevenson but even if he had the desire at that time anyway it was all tided up as Cubans and Soviets were not given a chance to go international. Later in life Ali was taking some serious punishment while Foreman cameback to beat the best in America and after Eastern Europe had opened up to defeat the best in the world. Foreman might have looked glum in the ring, but he had more power and his story and his record stands and he's many times better than Ali.