I suspect ejecta of the bovine variety.
what a waste of time. I thought Trekkies would be a cut above.
Do a vector analysis of a 3 body collision. So simple.
Hey, speak for yourself. I just got a really good deal on some swampland.We are not credulous fools.
Hey, speak for yourself. I just got a really good deal on some swampland.
Right. Extraordinary claims require at least SOME evidence on the part of the person making the claim. Not our job to just believe it, or do your work for you. If you solved a difficult problem, should be easy to give us something to work with, no?
If I just say I solved cold fusion, and it was simple, and tell you to do the math yourself, you'd ask questions, no?
Hi,
I read through this sort of thing... I would suggest using fusion reactors to heat hydrogen to a plasma through heat transfer across twin coils in two nacelles and a liquid plasma/electrode panel in the front to generate opposition in folds fleeting between your nacelles in opposing transitions for thrust. Efficiency is always a bonus, but solar shield is terrible on efficency. Test your ship in conjunction with your planetary shield and wait for Vulcans on a science mission to scan the warp trails.![]()
You know you can Like posts now.I wish this board had a reputation system. Love this post.
You know you can Like posts now.
Yeah right sorry.......... Not buying any of this . It's like all those charlatans trying to sell perpetual motion machines but when you ask to examine one or put it under scrutiny they go ballistic.
Like the E-cat scam
Saying vector analysis no more describes your engine than saying explosion describes an internal combustion engine.not selling anything. Publicly disclosed method of operation that should be understood by simple vector analysis. Do you even know what a vector is? Engineering term for direction. The mechanism should be intuitively obvious.
You've made a claim about this engine which you refuse to back up with a real working description.How you can claim to have an opinion without even a clue to Newtonian mechanics is irrational.
There's the sound of charlatanism.You snooze, you lose. You could have been in on the beginning of this.
That's just irrelevant. Your making the grandiose claim. Back it up.Free physics text at http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
If anyone has any intellectual curiosity and wishes understanding.
You could have been in on the beginning of this.
You snooze, you lose. You could have been in on the beginning of this.
Been in on what? It's public domain.
It is too important to be restricted or patented. By making public disclosure it is placed in the public domain and any greed heads are defeated from patenting it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.