• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Impulse engine a reality

what a waste of time. I thought Trekkies would be a cut above.
Do a vector analysis of a 3 body collision. So simple.

Can you really blame people for being skeptical?
You claim to have a simple solution to a difficult problem and you refuse to give actual sources or evidence. What kind of reaction were you expecting to that?
 
Right. Extraordinary claims require at least SOME evidence on the part of the person making the claim. Not our job to just believe it, or do your work for you. If you solved a difficult problem, should be easy to give us something to work with, no?

If I just say I solved cold fusion, and it was simple, and tell you to do the math yourself, you'd ask questions, no?
 
Right. Extraordinary claims require at least SOME evidence on the part of the person making the claim. Not our job to just believe it, or do your work for you. If you solved a difficult problem, should be easy to give us something to work with, no?

If I just say I solved cold fusion, and it was simple, and tell you to do the math yourself, you'd ask questions, no?

My first post included
The engine is basically an asymmetric oscillator. The asymmetry is imparted by an elastic collision of the piston or major moving part with 2 targets whose combined mass is equivalent to the "piston" for best mv transfer.
Example - think of breaking 2 balls with a cue ball. The 2 targets separate at 45 degrees from the original vector. The sideways component is equal and opposite and thus cancels The original vector is cut in half so the output of the device is about half of the original input pulse (generated via solenoid)

That's how simple it is. An elastic collision in 1 direction and a collision with 2 targets in the other. If you don't understand how that is asymmetric then you never took 1st semester physics.
 
It is too important to be restricted or patented. By making public disclosure it is placed in the public domain and any greed heads are defeated from patenting it. This simple device can change the world - build your own. We no longer need to steal someones oil and space is opened to us. Two blessings.
 
Yeah right sorry.......... Not buying any of this . It's like all those charlatans trying to sell perpetual motion machines but when you ask to examine one or put it under scrutiny they go ballistic.

Like the E-cat scam
 
Hi,

I read through this sort of thing... I would suggest using fusion reactors to heat hydrogen to a plasma through heat transfer across twin coils in two nacelles and a liquid plasma/electrode panel in the front to generate opposition in folds fleeting between your nacelles in opposing transitions for thrust. Efficiency is always a bonus, but solar shield is terrible on efficency. Test your ship in conjunction with your planetary shield and wait for Vulcans on a science mission to scan the warp trails. :p
 
Hi,

I read through this sort of thing... I would suggest using fusion reactors to heat hydrogen to a plasma through heat transfer across twin coils in two nacelles and a liquid plasma/electrode panel in the front to generate opposition in folds fleeting between your nacelles in opposing transitions for thrust. Efficiency is always a bonus, but solar shield is terrible on efficency. Test your ship in conjunction with your planetary shield and wait for Vulcans on a science mission to scan the warp trails. :p


I wish this board had a reputation system. Love this post.
 
Yeah right sorry.......... Not buying any of this . It's like all those charlatans trying to sell perpetual motion machines but when you ask to examine one or put it under scrutiny they go ballistic.

Like the E-cat scam

not selling anything. Publicly disclosed method of operation that should be understood by simple vector analysis. Do you even know what a vector is? Engineering term for direction. The mechanism should be intuitively obvious.
How you can claim to have an opinion without even a clue to Newtonian mechanics is irrational.
You snooze, you lose. You could have been in on the beginning of this.

Free physics text at http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
If anyone has any intellectual curiosity and wishes understanding.
 
not selling anything. Publicly disclosed method of operation that should be understood by simple vector analysis. Do you even know what a vector is? Engineering term for direction. The mechanism should be intuitively obvious.
Saying vector analysis no more describes your engine than saying explosion describes an internal combustion engine.

How you can claim to have an opinion without even a clue to Newtonian mechanics is irrational.
You've made a claim about this engine which you refuse to back up with a real working description.

You snooze, you lose. You could have been in on the beginning of this.
There's the sound of charlatanism.

Free physics text at http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/
If anyone has any intellectual curiosity and wishes understanding.
That's just irrelevant. Your making the grandiose claim. Back it up.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top