• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I'm disappointed that they still haven't brought back the Sheliak so far

So explore them more to make them less mysterious, thus less interesting.
Not necessarily. Aliens can be mysterious because we know very little, thus making learning more tantalizing. Featuring such aliens more then comes down to providing satisfying or amazing answers. Like how the Breen are treated in the novels:
In Star Trek: Typhon Pact - Zero Sum Game, we learn that the Breen are a multi-species society, a mirror of the Federation. The Confederacy is meritocratic but in an oppressive way - the suits anonymize everyone so only their skills count. Turns out, some species excel in areas and tend to dominate. Bottom line, instead of being one run-of-the-mill species, it's the Breen society that makes these aliens interesting rather than just the biology of its member species.
 
I think if the Sheliak were just another TNG humanoid alien race with some bumps on their heads, they would have been completely forgettable. The fact that it was a guy in a funky rubber suit whose features were shadowed was the only quality that made them stand out. But that's not enough. They are simply not interesting enough to follow up on, unless LDS showed them for comedic value like they did with Armus.

That's what gives them their potential though IMO. They looked kind of cool but they are also kind of a blank slate in terms of whatever culture they might have. You can take the cool look, fix it up a little to modern standards and then basically create a new culture almost from scratch.
 
Not necessarily. Aliens can be mysterious because we know very little, thus making learning more tantalizing. Featuring such aliens more then comes down to providing satisfying or amazing answers. Like how the Breen are treated in the novels:
In Star Trek: Typhon Pact - Zero Sum Game, we learn that the Breen are a multi-species society, a mirror of the Federation. The Confederacy is meritocratic but in an oppressive way - the suits anonymize everyone so only their skills count. Turns out, some species excel in areas and tend to dominate. Bottom line, instead of being one run-of-the-mill species, it's the Breen society that makes these aliens interesting rather than just the biology of its member species.
Which is nowhere in the shows themselves.

So...that doesn't actually answer my question.
 
At this point, the franchise has picked up so many characters or aliens or plot threads that started as one-off gimmicks, then developed them into rich, long-running elements of the universe. I must admit to being baffled by the insistence that because it's not 100% all the way fully developed in the first episode, it never could be, given how many times we've seen that position disproved at this point. I already mentioned the Barzan (who really set the bar -- if aliens as insubstantial and forgettable as the Barzan can be resurrected in an interesting fashion, what are we even talking about?). Just as implausibly, we've also seen the Pakleds turned into real adversaries. The exocomps were props, and now we have an exocomp that has had a great multi-season arc. There was nothing to M'Benga, and he's become fascinating. Or Christine Chapel - based on what we saw in TOS, there is nothing that warrants further exploration, and yet she's a standout on SNW.

Or going further back -- there's not much interesting about the Cardassians of "The Wounded", beyond their visual design. "The Host" leaves nowhere to go with the Trill. One of the best parts of Enterprise was it's exploration of the Andorian's, who were nothing more than intriguing makeup when ENT picked them up.

Obviously, if no one working on the show ever gets inspired by the Sheliak, they shouldn't force themselves, the Sheliak are not a must-revisit item. But there's plenty in a non-humanoid race with a cool design, a distinctive pattern of speech, and a unique value set to potentially spark the imagination. There's interesting dramatic tension in the fact that they regard humanoids as vermin, yet do hold themselves to a strict code in their dealings with them regardless. It certainly has more potential than yet another race of warriors or hunters.

I mean, the Overlookers on Voyager were all about bureaucracy, not an obvious avenue for drama. Yet they made awesome adversaries, because of clever writing. The stories with them had a freshness that other DQ adversaries lacked, because they were coming at it from a different angle. The same thing could potentially be done with the Sheliak.
 
Last edited:
Expanding on a one-episode species is nowhere near the level of "small universe" that continuing to add to Klingons or Vulcans is. And I even like it when they do that. I myself have created an entire Vulcan practice in my "Contemplative Silence" fanfics - including multiple different applications of the activity in question.

Expanding on someone we've met before is only as boring and repetitive as you let it be.
 
If that's the worse Trek is doing pretty good.

I don't know. I can't think of many worse lines from even way worse works. It was pretty horrible and out of place.

The character was good, one of the few good things to come out of Discovery. Just... that line was horrible.
 
I don't know. I can't think of many worse lines from even way worse works. It was pretty horrible and out of place.

The character was good, one of the few good things to come out of Discovery. Just... that line was horrible.

The worst line in Star Trek history is from "The Red Angel"

Georgiou: "Don't be so binary, in my universe he was pansexual and we had DEFCON-level fun together -- and you too, Papi."

edit: always fun when you happen to make post #47 of the thread...
 
Last edited:
I don't know. I can't think of many worse lines from even way worse works. It was pretty horrible and out of place.

The character was good, one of the few good things to come out of Discovery. Just... that line was horrible.
Data in relationships hurt me more.

Metaphorically. Honestly, calling it horrible is excessive to me. One line. Night in Sickbay I'll avoid before Season 2 of Discovery.
 
Data in relationships hurt me more.

Metaphorically. Honestly, calling it horrible is excessive to me. One line. Night in Sickbay I'll avoid before Season 2 of Discovery.

I'll watch A Night In Sickbay on loop over literally anything from Discovery.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top