But it was said they left after Surak, because they would not accept logic.
It has also been said there is no canonical proof of that, or dialogue that was their reason - only they apparently left about then. We might assume they did so with warp drive, but that's an assumption, too. They could have taken off with multigenerational ships or sleeper ships, and with ion drive and continuous acceleration, gotten close to c and reached Romulus in a few decades.
From that and the earlier gongs about the war sending the Vulcan back to the stone age. In the Cochrane example you are using a society which has shown the ability to cooperate long term, enough to create all the technology that would lead up to warp over millenia. (p.s.: how accurate is the memory alpha? They mention atomic weapons during the war... so apparently pre-other warp parallel technologies, or some other explanation of course). They also assert the Dabrune are descended from Vulcans who left at the same time as the Romulans. How violent/logical are they?
I don't know. But if they can work together to war on another clan, to make atomic bombs, I'm confident someone could have made warp drive alone or worked together to do that, too. And warp drive may have been around for centuries before Surak, so they have all the time in the world. Nothing says the Romulans took off as soon as they developed warp drive.
Maybe he was a madman, and he wrote them during his lucid hours.
Or maybe he didn't write them at all, but murdered the guy who did and he took credit for them, and his soul has been lying its ass off ever since. Maybe. I see little point in this level of "maybe" speculation without some decent foundation for it elsewhere.
No, but it points to predispositions... or it to be endemic to their whole species it would seem to have a biological/genetically inheritable component, essentially a fact of their biology.
To have that, one would have to almost have an identical genome and been separated by nearly no time at all, evolutionally speaking, like Romulans and Vulcans. If they've been apart from much longer, they could easily have wildly different behavior traits, like Chimps and Bonobos apart for 2 million years now, but virtually identical genome.
Maybe, but they never said they weren't Vulcanoids (by which I mean related to, not just resembling, Vulcans).
They didn't say they weren't related to lots of other species, too, but that is hardly worth mentioning. But discovering they were genetically related to Vulcans would be worth mentioning, and it would be wrong to call them proto-vulcans if they were related since you would call them vulcans, or a cousin or offshoot of that same species. They didn't. They aren't. It's just wrong to invent that stuff out of whole cloth without some dialogue to back it up. And no one used the term vulcanoid anywhere in the episode, either. Just proto-vulcans, and by that they meant they looked like them and resembled culturally them in some important ways.
I never said pinnacle, I said blank, a basic template. Moving on.
What do you imagine a basic humanoid template to be, and where do they keep that information in a one-celled organism, let alone the puzzle program to help us find it?
And there's nothing about current genetics that says the "seeding" idea is impossible, and they haven't pegged anything down about it in-world, just suggested (and made it seem acceptable/likely) that this is probably how things happened. Or maybe straight up colonies (which then species independent evolution is out, only divergent)
Sure they did – they claim the human template is in what they seeded on the planet where life had already taken root. Crusher says it's been part of all life on earth for 4 billion years. This is demonstrably wrong on the real world level of science and genetics, so it's impossible. Though the story could be modified in ways to make it more plausible, I suppose, but not without having to contradict what they actually said or did to a fair degree.
I'm confused... yeah, the Kir'Shara was straight original... from 2000 years ago... and yeah, the written word was lost (at least the original.. maybe there were bastard copies). But the teachings, the actual philosophies and practices, were obviously not.
The actual practice was not completely lost, but even the closest was off, a bit perverted, and to bring one back on track took years of study and work.
otherwise we wouldn't have 2000 years of Vulcan "logic" even if it was way of from Surak's original intentions. And again, we primarily see dominant Vulcan culture, as opposed to popular, or any one of many counter-cultures (which ENT does the most to show some with the
V'tosh ka'tur and the Syrranites)
The dominant culture was reflected in the high command, which was way off, even if it embraced logic, it also embraced a martial philosophy and not pacifism.
Um, V'Las (and not only him, but everyone around him that went along with him)... was that so long before Spock?
About 100 years before Spock. So most of Vulcan has been bending back toward Surak's original teachings for the past 100 years by the time of Spock.
We never see much of Vulcans in TOS, so who knows what they were doing. Certainly in TNG they seem to have made excellent progress... but there are things... they do still condone murder, during the Pon farr (if there's a challenge)... let's face it, that's murder, justified by "need" and "tradition."
Murder is a legal definition, and I bet what they do there is legal. You may find it morally reprehensible, but most anyone involved would be found not guilty anyway by reason of temporary insanity in our culture. Even T'Pring, for while only Spock looks nutso, she may be, too.