What might have been different?
The transporter was developed by the production staff of the original series as a solution of how to get crewmen off a planet quickly. The only alternative was to either land a massive ship each week, or regularly use shuttles for landings, both of which would have wreaked havoc on the production budget. (Star Trek Encyclopedia, 3rd ed., p. 519) Although both of these were proposed in the initial draft of the series outline Star Trek is... (with regular shuttlecraft landings and rare descents of the ship), a revision of the same document (as reprinted in The Making of Star Trek, pp. 22-30) contains one of the first examples wherein the concept of the transporter was outlined. ([3]; The Making of Star Trek, p. 26) The description posits a not-yet-named "energy-matter scrambler which can 'materialize' [landing parties] onto the planet's surface." The outline goes on to say, "This requires maximum beam power and is a tremendous drain on the cruiser's power supply. It can be done only across relatively short line-of-sight distances. Materials and supplies can also be moved in this same manner, but require a less critical power expenditure." (The Making of Star Trek, p. 26)
OK: Since the cost of visual effects would not have been an issue, there would have been no transporter.
From http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Transporter:
As I recall, in the Hoaxverse (and I spent some time there, a few years back, trying to figure out the origins of the "Requiem for a Martian" hoax, which is how I encountered the much more obscure "movie serial" and "dime novel series" hoaxes), it WAS a radio series.
I think the "flying saucer" part was implied in that description...hence the cylinders being "above" and "below" (the saucer).Unless newspapers printed illustrated ads for a Trek radio series, different listeners would have imagined a starship of wildly varying designs even if it were described. (Remember how Captain Christopher in "Tomorrow is Yesterday" simply described the Enterprise as "two cylinders above, one below"? No mention of a "saucer" at all. From that line, listeners might have imagined nothing more than three rocket tubes.)
"Yes! Punching the Gorn's ears seems to have disoriented him. I've got to get away... get some distance! Yes! That rise over there."
(Panting sounds.)
"Yes... this rock should do nicely."
(Grunt of exertion.)
"He's recovering. Now -- heave!"
(Sound of object whooshing through the air and striking a leathery surface. Growl of pain from the Gorn.)
"Yes! A hit! But -- no, it's barely staggered him! What incredible strength! Now he's -- no -- he's heading for that large boulder! There's no way he could -- but he is! He's... lifting it above his head! It must weigh over a ton! Could he possibly throw it hard enough --"
(A loud grunt of exertion from the Gorn, and a heavier whooshing sound.)
"He did! Have to dodge, dodge for all I'm worth!"
(Heavy thud of the boulder striking rock, rolling downhill.)
"Whew! That was close! I could feel the breeze as it blew past! Better not take any chances -- up the mountain, quickly! My speed is my only advantage!"
(The sound of swift footsteps on stone, and Kirk panting. Fade out these sounds and asteroid ambience; fade in bridge background audio.)
"Have you tried overload, Mr. Scott?"
"Aye, Mr. Spock. It does no good..."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.