If they said it wasn't Prime from the beginning (and not connected with the NuTrek universe) then I'd happily watch it. There are just too many glaring inconsistencies for my OCD to handle.
If they said it wasn't Prime from the beginning (and not connected with the NuTrek universe) then I'd happily watch it. There are just too many glaring inconsistencies for my OCD to handle.
I having issues with tone of the show i understand the need to update the look of ship i can get past the holograms and the klingons that have foreheads ENT then don't ENT TOS and the have them. i can look past that its taking me time but i can it like worf having ridges in TNG and at first i was like what hes not a klingon but i can work with it and live with it it a tone thing its darker than most star trek episodes ( we get some dark ones ) but it feels like it missing the idealism that the TOS had and i think i am having hard time with at ATM because they said it 10 years before Kirk and it feels like there no reason for it to be there in that time if they set it 24 cen or even 50 years after TOS or TNG i could see them changing after the Dominion thing or some major disaster and get a bit darker for a bit but the time they say it in was a time of kirk. i know some ppl think other wise i am just not liking the tone and it feels a little strange not sure what it is it just hard to get in to can put my finger on it tho.
tho i will keep watching and see how it gose.
IMO
Then he should accept what the people who make the shows say is fact. nuEnterprise: 700m. Discovery: Prime timeline.
Am I missing the point here in reading his position as simply being that it doesn't matter?
I joined up to try and discuss and understand these issues. So far every time I answer or reply to a thread I get accused of being a newbie hater. I am enjoying now this thread, and the fact that such established members are also finding inconsistency in what the show is presenting and what the writers and producers are proclaiming.I like the show in general, but I feel it's held back so enormously by them declaring it Prime canon at this point in the timeline, but then apparently not adhering to the period's visual style nor many of its narrative characteristics. I mean, there's now a holodeck in the 23rd century? (Still a minor one among the many issues.) Why on Earth couldn't this have been a 25th century sequel?
Sorry. You are getting caught up in long standing debates about the nature of the franchise that won't soon abate.I joined up to try and discuss and understand these issues. So far every time I answer or reply to a thread I get accused of being a newbie hater. I am enjoying now this thread, and the fact that such established members are also finding inconsistency in what the show is presenting and what the writers and producers are proclaiming.
I truly hope this all just gets cleaned up ASAP.
Pretty much my reaction to Discovery so far in a nutshell.That show, man: so exciting and so frustrating!
So, I'm back here with my first post in, gosh, eight years or so... just to say that whatever the reason was for them doing this as a prequel, I had better find out very soon where they're going with this and why they keep adding more and more continuity issues. I like the show in general, but I feel it's held back so enormously by them declaring it Prime canon at this point in the timeline, but then apparently not adhering to the period's visual style nor many of its narrative characteristics. I mean, there's now a holodeck in the 23rd century? (Still a minor one among the many issues.) Why on Earth couldn't this have been a 25th century sequel? In that case, I would have zero questions and would enjoy the heck out of this show. But as is, all I can think of is: When's the reset button coming on all this advanced tech? When are they finally going to change out of their butt-ugly 70s disco outfits and wear the classic red/gold/blue? When will we get a good explanation for why Michael's foster dad had to be Sarek?
That show, man: so exciting and so frustrating!
Did Enterprise "violate"..."continuity"??
CLOAKING DEVICE!Borg
Ferengi
Holodecks
HOLODECKCLOAKING DEVICE!
Gosh, I really hate that stuff. At least they didn't make a $200,000,000.oo movie explaining how 2 proton torpedoes can blow up a space station.It's not a reboot.
Why?
Because they clearly are stating it's in the same time universe and going out on a limb to link it with multiple references every new episode since Episode 3. It's just not beholden to the style of a show over 30 years old and doesn't sweat the details.
And it's driving fans nuts.
Because, yes, said fans are Trekkies. Eventually, someone in the novels will have a random character say this because those who buy the novels are uber-Trekkies.
"Wow, did you notice the Constitution-class looks nothing like our ship?"
"Yes, it is designed in the Tellarite minimalist style."
"Fascinating. Did you hear Starfleet banned the use of holodecks?"
"Yes, shocking. They also are banning the use of holographic communication technology since it's all manufactured on Cygnus Rigel X and they're a military dictatorship."
"It'll be a century before they can redevelop it."
"Mm hmm. Oh and we've dissected the Klingons and discovered they suffer a version of the Klingon Augment virus which makes them LESS human looking."
"Weird."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.