• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

If there had been no wars..

Yeah, people will then be too fat and too unhealthy to fight.

Apparently, no two countries that have a McDonald's has ever gone to war with one another, so my plan is to build McDonald's in every country.

That's not remotely true. Belgrade had a McDonald's. When the US started bombing Serbia, the population retaliated by burning it down.

That happened, of course, right AFTER the "golden arches" theory of conflict prevention was published. When it came out, it WAS true. Of course, they even argued after that the conflict there was so short because they wanted to get back to being part of the global market, symbolized by McDonalds. Since it came out, Israel/Lebanon and Russia/Georgia have also had a go at it...
 
Well, one of those events wasn't a war, unless Martin Luther sacked some principality I'm unaware of after he finished posting his 95 Theses? There are plenty of other notable events that weren't military events.

Martin Luther and his 95 theses are an excellent example of how military events are sometimes completely dwarfed in importance by non-military events. Quite often, wars are just the waves on the surface of the sea of history.

If newspapers had existed in 1521, and we could read them, they would be full of news about the latest Italian War between France and the Empire. The news that a German theologian had been condemned for heresy at the Diet of Worms would have been confined to the back pages--and even then, it would have seemed important mostly because it was preoccupying the Emperor, when he should have been devoting his full attention to the war with France.

But, who today has heard of the Italian Wars? Which is not to say that these conflicts didn't have important consequences--especially for Italy. Just that they have long since been eclipsed in popular memory by the Protestant Reformation.

I think there are two reasons why war looms so large in history, even today, compared to other subjects.

First, because whatever else it is, war can be very dramatic. Conflict is the essence of drama, and war is conflict in its most direct and physical form.

Second, because wars are the business of governments, and until relatively recently, history has been government-centric. Even today, government archives are still one of the most important sites for historical research.

On the one hand, people--especially men--just enjoy reading about war. Economic history, by contrast, puts most people to sleep--despite its obvious importance.

On the other hand, since history is the study of the written records of the past, its content is determined by what has been documented, and what hasn't.

If you go, for example, to the National Archives of the United Kingdom, you'll find that one of its most extensive document collections is the papers of the War Office. And one of the chief reasons why members of the public go to the NA is to search through the service records of British soldiers and sailors of the Great War, looking for their ancestors.
 
Yeah, warfare definitely dominates people's imaginations. I know one friend of mine who traced his ancestry back to the battle of Hastings (actually, he can also trace it back to one of Henry I's illegitimate daughters). He definitely takes on history with a warrior's perspective (his Senior Thesis was about Odo of Bayeux, the Warrior Bishop).
 
But Martin Luther kicked of centuries of the most brutal European warfare, which started with the Peasants' war and probably ended with the defeat of Nazi Germany, since Luther wanted all synagogues burned. He also regarded Muslims as tools of Satan and wanted to ban publication of the Koran, so we may not be through with him yet.
 
How would that have affected recorded history. If you look at history its mostly about wars.

Well, history isn't mostly about wars. That's just what mainly gets recorded, as you say. If there were no wars then I guess other stuff would be recorded and so that's what history would be about - maybe the way farming developed; or boat building; the big players in childcare. These things do get recorded but they aren't what history is about. Maybe they'd become what history is about.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top