...both?Which part giving the alien god two barrels of freedom or letting Wesley not die?

...both?Which part giving the alien god two barrels of freedom or letting Wesley not die?
More moral than standing back and saving no one? Sure.
IOW, there's nothing immoral about saving people. If you can't save everyone then the next BEST thing is to save as many as you can.
BTW,
For what it's worth, Picard at least did seem consistent that it was better to save no one than (selectively or randomly) too few people, he felt that way not just about aliens in trouble but also his own crew-he preferred to destroy the Enterprise rather than accept that half the crew be killed so the other half would be spared ("Where Silence Las Lease").
^Well the First Officer has to concur and the CMO, alone or along with the senior staff, can remove a captain from command although that process seems to rarely happen.
It was a shame that Picard didn't properly adhere to the prime directive in that instance.And of course they eventually relented and agreed with Picard to let Wesley go. Let's face it. The idiot should have been watching where he was going.
I don't like the way they formulate the prime directive. There's no such thing as "destiny", it's superstitious nonsense. They have no right to do duck-blinds on pre-warp planets as if they were watching animals. I think it's far more disrespectful than a direct confrontation.
Disrespectful in what way?
The weird thing though is, that in Homeward, Picard at first seems very adamant they 'should' let them die, even though it pains him, and he is furious at Nikolai for saving them behind his back. At the end of the episode however, we have this:
To me this sounds like not only is Picard torn between saving those people and adhering to what he sees is the "correct" interpretation of the PD, it sounds like he is actually glad someone else breaks it for him. Possibly because thinks he cannot do so, as a Captain (would he perhaps have done it, had he been in a less visible and "exemplary" position )?
Picard probably wouldn't have permitted Spock to place the "freeze" device in the volcano, Picard would have stopped the mission before it started.Picard would have let Kelvin Spock die in that volcano..the bastard!
^ Picard: You think we should hide the Enterprise...where?
^ Picard: You think we should hide the Enterprise...where?
The whole thing kind of assumes civilizations developing in isolation is the natural course of things, leaving the weak ones to perish, cruel towards prewarp people imo
They hid their ship in the corona of a sun, you'd think an ocean wouldn't be much of a problem...
Maybe so, but it's still ridiculous to decide to fly a massive starship through the atmosphere into an ocean and then back out to space and somehow expect that to be less intrusive/less likely to cause contamination than just parking it in high orbit or above the poles or behind a moon and sending a shuttle to the surface.
Not to mention, the ship isn't the only thing that could potentially be damaged in this equation. Harming the ocean ecosystem could be just as devastating to the local people as accidentally revealing your presence.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.