• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

If Star Trek were made by another Star Trek species, how would they portray the Federation)?

at Quark's

Vice Admiral
Admiral
.... and the situation in the Alpha Quadrant more in general? (assuming 24th century here).

I'll give it a shot.

The Klingon depiction of the Federation: Generally reliable when in an alliance with them, but prone to hedonism, which weakens them. It's a wonder they got as powerful as they did, however, they can get quite fierce when in a tight spot - perhaps that explains it. However the moment the crisis has passed they return to their softened selves, preventing them from reaping the full glory (and spoils) of victory.

Romulan: A dangerous, unreliable species. Unpredictable. They have neither honour nor a strict moral code they live up to. That is, they do seem to have some kind of moral code, but they reason around it, making what is wrong in one situation, right in another according to their perverted ethics. This vile, insipid weakness will ultimately be their downfall. But meanwhile they still maintain technological parity with us. Since they are so unpredictable, we need to monitor them very closely.

Cardassian: They are ambivalent in their approach to power. While they do seem to appreciate the coarser aspects of it - they build formidable ships and you'd better know what you are doing when you are confronting a Federation foe head on - they still seem quite reluctant in using it, they don't seem to revel in it like the Klingons do. Appreciation for the finer aspects of power is even entirely absent, which greatly hinders their influence in this quadrant, which is however still superior to ours. They seem quite gullible - they call it 'negotiating in good faith' or something like that - and we are bound to profit from that sooner or later.

Ferengi: Potentially a huge market. These people are given to hedonism, and fortunes are to be made. What spoils everything though, is their nosy attitude and their rigid moral codes. They seem to believe they are destined to tell other species -including us- how to live. But greed is eternal and it is only a matter of time before our values triumph over theirs.

Borg: A quaint little society. Extremely inefficient and archaic, yet until now they have resisted all our attempts to liberate them from their imperfections and limitations. We must gather more intelligence in their territory to understand the nature of their resistance ....
 
I believe I mention it twice.

I mentioned hedonism with the Klingons because in several episodes, Klingon warriors seem to despise the Ent-D for having comfortable beds and other comforts (see for example how in Unification, the Klingon captain lambasts Picard), so I figured the Klingons would look at it that way (at least the warrior caste). With the Ferengi I mentioned it since it would be a point of approach for selling them all kinds of luxury stuff, which might be harder with, say, Klingons or Romulans.
 
The Bajorans: Their religions suffer from a deplorable lack of Orbs, only a fraction of them are religious the way we are and unlike us, they've never even met their gods, let alone spoken to them. Very few of them think that killing yourself publically is a reasonable way to protest and the ones who do often kill others first.
 
Ferengi: their language includes lots of racist expressions: I am all ears, play by ear, fall on deaf ears, lend an ear, ears are burning, wet behind the ears...etc

What's with these people and ears???
 
Betazoids

"They're a bit on the militaristic side and take themselves too seriously, but we give them our friendship and tolerate their presence here"
 
I'm rather curious how Star Trek would look like if it were made by another Federation member, maybe by another founding species. I can, for example, imagine an Andorian-made Enterprise-era series where Shran is just as instrumental in creating the Federation as Archer is in our Trek, and the Vulcans are portrayed even more negatively, perhaps outright villainous. The Vulcan version would probably play down Humanity's role in creating and running the Federation. I think the greatest differences in a Star Trek created by an alien founding Federation member would appear in the Enterprise era, as all three would naturally focus on how it was primarily their idea and effort.

Taking this into the 24th century, I can imagine their portrayal of the Federation would be largely similar to our Star Trek, only with the anthropocentrism replaced with andorio- and vulcanocentrism. We might see majority Vulcan or Andorian crews and hear more references to the 40 Eridani Construction Yards than to Utopia Planitia, for example. Though I think the Vulcan version would probably be just a matter-of-fact documentary full of their trademark haughtiness regarding all these primitive emotional people who are constantly creating all kinds of messes that only Vulcan logic can clean up after.
 
The Federation - A humancentric club, how this new race dominates things baffles us

The Klingons - A Warrior race, I guess no one does any farming, manual labour or anything else apart from looking for a fight

The Romulans - they need their Vulcan cousins

The Vulcans - they need their Romulan cousins
 
Kelpiens: They're short, slow, weak, bad eyesight, bad hearing. It takes them forever to learn one extra language (lucky they have the UT) but we like them.
 
Hot Sultry Breen are standing by to lift off their helmets and talk to you! You don't need your translator modified to hear what these mysterious and possibly cold-admiring humanoids are all about. Get ready to have your energy dampened by the Breen Beam. Call 19001230921318901231908

commercial on Orion Broadcasting Service
 
Why did Weyoun say that the Breen world wasn't cold? When he first said it, I thought it would be significant but then, as often, there was no follow-up.
 
I wouldn’t refer to the desire for comfort and recreation as hedonism. Klingons are pretty hedonistic with their violent sex and blood wine.

I think Klingons would portray humans as soft and litigious, with a distaste for war and conquest. Like, the way King Of The Hill portrays liberals.

Ferengi would portray them as morally uptight people who are self righteous and ruin the party.

I think Romulans and Cardassians about the same, like morally corrupt monsters out for blood.

Vulcans: Well meaning, selfish emotional children. They get into trouble due to their emotions then fix their issues by learning the ways of logic. Like Home Improvement, where Wilson is the Vulcan.
 
Last edited:
I think the Borg would probably portray them as a bunch of anarchy loving animals, while the Pakleds would portray them as intellectual but snobby super geniuses who wouldn’t let them borrow their super advanced technology.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top