Guiding development and all that good stuff. Does the Federation remove him in order to enforce the Prime Directive?
There's only one bit of contradictory evidence on that: Kirk claims he holds jurisdiction over the civilian Merrick in "Bread and Circuses" for his interference with the local culture, and refers to "one of our most important laws" for that.Even Federation civilians are not required to follow it.
There's only one bit of contradictory evidence on that: Kirk claims he holds jurisdiction over the civilian Merrick in "Bread and Circuses" for his interference with the local culture, and refers to "one of our most important laws" for that.Even Federation civilians are not required to follow it.
Kirk may be lying, though, to Get His Man. And while Claudius tries to equate the rules that make Merrick a criminal with the rules that bind Kirk's hands, it's far from certain that Merrick was to be accused of PD violation. There could be a different law that only forbids civilians from actually becoming politically involved in primitive cultures, or whatever. Gary Seven didn't run for any office we would know of...
The same episode has Kirk justify his interference as an attempt to remove previous interference. But again, Kirk may be lying, being pissed off at the fact that Merrick is not just a crook but a Starfleet Academy dropout. Who could hate Gary Seven and his cute attempts at smiling?
Apart from that, the PD indeed seems to exist solely to stop Starfleet officers from exercising their godlike powers for actually becoming local gods. Which in turn might mean Kirk sees no fault in ousting the likes of Gary Seven, an act that doesn't profit Starfleet or him personally.
In TNG, a century later, it's clear that Picard can't even stop UFP citizens from interfering unless they are Starfleet personnel - indeed, the PD itself stops Picard there ("Angel One"). Chances of him being cleared for stopping Gary Seven would be slim indeed, then.
Timo Saloniemi
If there's a legal mechanism in place to stop what you've suggested, it's implementation isn't carried out by Starfleet. That does not mean there's no organization that does.So civilians should feel free make themselves Gods and mess up any primitive culture, basically making the regulation/law irrelevant?
There's only one bit of contradictory evidence on that: Kirk claims he holds jurisdiction over the civilian Merrick in "Bread and Circuses" for his interference with the local culture, and refers to "one of our most important laws" for that.Even Federation civilians are not required to follow it.
Kirk may be lying, though, to Get His Man. And while Claudius tries to equate the rules that make Merrick a criminal with the rules that bind Kirk's hands, it's far from certain that Merrick was to be accused of PD violation. There could be a different law that only forbids civilians from actually becoming politically involved in primitive cultures, or whatever. Gary Seven didn't run for any office we would know of...
The United States Merchant Marine[1] is the fleet of U.S. civilian-owned merchant vessels, operated by either the government or the private sector, that engage in commerce or transportation of goods and services in and out of the navigable waters of the United States. The Merchant Marine is responsible for transporting cargo and passengers during peacetime. In time of war, the Merchant Marine is capable of being an auxiliary to the Navy, and can be called upon to deliver military personnel and materiel for the military.[2] The Merchant Marine however, does not have a role in combat, although a merchant mariner has a responsibility to protect cargo carried aboard his ship.
What's wrong with it?And really ... "Aegis?"
So civilians should feel free make themselves Gods and mess up any primitive culture, basically making the regulation/law irrelevant?
.
If there's a legal mechanism in place to stop what you've suggested, it's implementation isn't carried out by Starfleet. That does not mean there's no organization that does.
So civilians should feel free make themselves Gods and mess up any primitive culture, basically making the regulation/law irrelevant?
The Federation merchant marine must have some sort of non-interference article. Else they'd be dropping Coca-Cola bottles on stone age cultures constantly.
So civilians should feel free make themselves Gods and mess up any primitive culture, basically making the regulation/law irrelevant?
The relevance would come from the fact that Starfleet personnel operate starships, with photon torpedoes and phasers, while civilians do not. Civilians simply aren't all that threatening. If they do manage to influence local development, so what? Nobody really cares. But if Starfleet does that, the next thing we're looking at is a de facto or even de jure military coup.
It's not the worshippers that matter, but the gods.
Timo Saloniemi
I would imagine things would change considerably right after they ran out of ammunition.Send a squad of fully armed Seals to Ancient Rome and stuff can change a lot.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.