There's a preview of the FCBD issue here, explaining how they're shoving it in with something approximating screen canon: https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/0...on-mirror-universe-free-comic-book-day-title/
^ Perhaps the ship was named after Mirror Spock's reforms but before his death. It's conceivable that he was trying to emulate "our" Starfleet and after his death the name stuck.
I would be...unsurprised if there's a Mirror Ent-D by the end of the mini.The cover made me think it was going to be a Mirror Ent-D not the Stargazer.
I tend to look at it as an "infinite monkeys" thing, especially when there's no crossover to the "real" universe. When you allow for infinite permutations, the unlikely-as-hell-but-minor things like a group of the same characters existing and coming together only bugs me when they get really, grossly over-the-top with it that don't even make sense on their own, like the 2009 movie. There's no accident here, it's the result of the observer looking for familiar-yet-different permutations out of the possibilities.Hmm, maybe. It's just one of the many instances where it's hard to believe two such different histories would converge on the same details -- same people being born and ending up working together, same ship designs and names, etc.
But of course, there need to be similarities to (a) justify the TNG title and (b) aim to be reminiscent of the TV shows to draw in fans thereof. There's a reason they get J.K. Woodward to do this and not a Humberto Ramos-type, after all.When it comes to onscreen stuff, you kind of have to do that because budget limitations require using your regular actors and standing sets, but in prose or comics, there should be more freedom to diverge.
the Terran Empire would never have named a ship the Stargazer. That's a name that makes sense for a peaceful, science-driven Starfleet, but doesn't work at all for a ruthless empire's tool of terror and conquest. If the ship had a Mirror counterpart, it would probably have a more belligerent name.
To be fair, the cover image is inconsistent with the Stargazer bridge as seen on those preview panels, which is more or less an exact replica of the set used in The Battle except with modifications meant to represent the MU. My point is, there is now console behind the captain's chair similar to the Enterprise D's tactical station, as depicted on the cover.The cover made me think it was going to be a Mirror Ent-D not the Stargazer.
Glad to see the MU continuing to be explored. At some point I'd like to see a list of all of the different strands of the MU that branch off from what has been established on screen.
Calling it Stardestroyer could have created marketplace confusion and may have resulted in the comic being delayed until September.One thing bugs me, though -- the Terran Empire would never have named a ship the Stargazer. That's a name that makes sense for a peaceful, science-driven Starfleet, but doesn't work at all for a ruthless empire's tool of terror and conquest. If the ship had a Mirror counterpart, it would probably have a more belligerent name.
One thing bugs me, though -- the Terran Empire would never have named a ship the Stargazer. That's a name that makes sense for a peaceful, science-driven Starfleet, but doesn't work at all for a ruthless empire's tool of terror and conquest. If the ship had a Mirror counterpart, it would probably have a more belligerent name.
"Then get yourself".....
"Or heck, I could do a list myself".....
Was I supposed to know the answer to my question before I posted it?
I don't think it was meant as "you should have known this", but rather "here is a recommendation for how you can get what you want".![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.