• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I watched cloverfield...

:censored: crap, npsf3000. I never though of that thing only being a baby! And, The Academic same for your info about the parasites. Fascinating!

I now want to revisit it but my initial feelings on it were; I hated the people, (wanted them to get eaten.) Hated the shaky cam but it wasn't as bad an experience for me than I thought it would be, going in. The wait to see the Thing was painfully long after anticipating seeing it for so long.

The Creature is freaking awesome! I fell way from my Godzilla addition long, long ago but that beast fully reminded me why I used to like such things in the first place!

I'd probably go see a sequel without much prodding.
 
Though I still have no idea why we are discussing Cloverfield in the Trek XI forum :lol:
Yeah, I kinda keep waiting for the thread to develop a point which is pertinent to this movie, but it seems never to have gotten very far past "Luckily Star trek is made 6 times the budget." :shifty:
 
Well, I suppose one could argue that 'Cloverfield' is indicative of J.J. Abrams' film-making abilities to some extent...
 
J.J. Abram had a significant role in the making of cloverfield, and he has a significant role in Star trek.

By understanding clover field we may understand something about star trek...

EDIT:

I love how everyone says 'hammer down' was not a nuclear strike... though all their reasons (radiation, emp and huge destructive power) completely ignores that nukes range from 0.3 Kilo tons to 50 megatons...

A 1.5 Kiloton B61 is exactly what i would use against a "invincible" monster.
 
Last edited:
J.J. Abram had a significant role in the making of cloverfield, and he has a significant role in Star trek.

I am repeating myself here but Abrams did not direct Cloverfield which is a pretty important job.
And Orci/Kurtzman did not write the Cloverfield story which is a pretty important job too.
Not to mention the hand held camera premise of the film or the plot that have nothing to do with Trek XI.

So I still don't see why we are discussing Cloverfield.
Imo Abrams being an important producer in a monster movie doesn't show us anything.
If one needs to get a feel for Abrams/Kurtzman/Orci work MI:3 is the way to go.
 
Then make a thread based on that, or talk about it here...

Obviously we will see when the movie comes out, but i will see if there are any correlations when the movie comes out.
 
Well, I suppose one could argue that 'Cloverfield' is indicative of J.J. Abrams' film-making abilities to some extent...

I don't think it is...
The artistic direction of a movie lies (usually) primarily with the director.
 
I actually haven't seen MI:3 myself.

I have it on DVD.
We could watch it together... though I'm sure we wouldn't make it to the end... ;)

;)

Well, I suppose one could argue that 'Cloverfield' is indicative of J.J. Abrams' film-making abilities to some extent...

I don't think it is...
The artistic direction of a movie lies (usually) primarily with the director.

Oh, agreed. I didn't say the arguer would be right. ;)
 
Abrams didn't write or direct Cloverfield, so I'm not sure what about Abrams writing or directing ability we're suppose see from it.
 
Abrams is the producer of Cloverfield, Abrams is also the producer of star trek.

From the interviews given, it is apparent that Abrams had a significant role in the making of Cloverfield, from actually envisioning the movie (from a trip to Hong Kong) to things like involving Slusho! in the viral ad campaign.

So it is not completely irrelevant.

Either way we will find out in a few weeks, and this is an experiment for those interested based of thoughts before viewing star trek 11.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top