The show and its audience are smart enough to differentiate between British imperialism circa 1775 and the British TV viewing public post-y2k.the target audience would have to be painted as the villains of the piece.
Besides, it's not like we're blind to the failings and faux-pas of our nation in its long history, and we're quite used to being portrayed as villains. Seriously, this isn't a concern.
Actually a historically accurate Who episode that dispeled a few American myths about 'satanically evil' redcoats (yes Im talking to you Mel Gibson) could be a breath of fresh air.
We didn't want America anyway...![]()
Historically speaking, there were many in Britain who strongly supported self governance for America. There were even some British newspapers that would report American troops success's as victories for 'our soldiers'. Some historians have even gone so far as to suggest that Lord Howe, in charge of British forces, may have deliberately allowed the Americans to succeed (Howe was a member of the Whig Party, forerunner to today's Liberals. A defeat in a foreign war would have been a massive embarrassment to the Tory government of the day), although that is by no means certain.
On the other side of the pond, there were many in America who considered themselves British subjects, and were proud to be so. To them, those who sought independence were traitors. As the revolution grew, they were persecuted, attacked, their homes and businesses vandalised.
So it is certainly misleading to see this as being a case of every Brit wanting one thing, every American wanting another.