No, it hasn't been destroyed. We can see it in Star Trek III-the search for Spock" and since the events in that movie takes place after the events in the current movie, Vulcan is still there.
I don't think Vulcan [SPOILERS]
- Thread starter MadBaggins
- Start date
No, it hasn't been destroyed. We can see it in Star Trek III-the search for Spock" and since the events in that movie takes place after the events in the current movie, Vulcan is still there.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
The Narada and Jellyfish went through the singularity, Vulcan collapsed and formed one. When the Narada was struck and formed a singularity it could not escape and was destroyed by the Enterprise. Vulcan is gone.
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
The key word is "sand."The Narada and Jellyfish went through the singularity, Vulcan collapsed and formed one. When the Narada was struck and formed a singularity it could not escape and was destroyed by the Enterprise. Vulcan is gone.
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
All Seeing Eye
Admiral
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
If you stick a big rock in the top of the hour glass is it going to go through to the bottom? it would need breaking down into dust first, would it turn back into a rock at the bottom? NO.
Obviously not.
The Narada and Jellyfish went through the singularity, Vulcan collapsed and formed one. When the Narada was struck and formed a singularity it could not escape and was destroyed by the Enterprise. Vulcan is gone.
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
If you stick a big rock in the top of the hour glass is it going to go through to the bottom? it would need breaking down into dust first, would it turn back into a rock at the bottom? NO.
Obviously not.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Plus, the surface of Vulcan was crumbling to pieces before it was even sucked into the black hole. Even if Vulcan came out some other end, it wouldn't look pretty.
Plus, the surface of Vulcan was crumbling to pieces before it was even sucked into the black hole. Even if Vulcan came out some other end, it wouldn't look pretty.
Forget it. Lynx is living in the Old Timeline. Leave Lynx be.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Its a freakin' desert planet! How pretty does it have to look?
Its a freakin' desert planet! How pretty does it have to look?
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Yes, I have and I wasn't that impressed.
Quonos wrote:
As for the "new" or more correct alternate timeline, it sucks. Therefore I dismiss it, just like every day when I thow out garbage.
The Narada and Jellyfish went through the singularity, Vulcan collapsed and formed one. When the Narada was struck and formed a singularity it could not escape and was destroyed by the Enterprise. Vulcan is gone.
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
If you stick a big rock in the top of the hour glass is it going to go through to the bottom? it would need breaking down into dust first, would it turn back into a rock at the bottom? NO.
Obviously not.
Yes, I have and I wasn't that impressed.
Quonos wrote:
Why must stating an opinion always result in a personal attack? Lack of arguments?
As for the "new" or more correct alternate timeline, it sucks. Therefore I dismiss it, just like every day when I thow out garbage.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Nothing about the new timeline is "more correct." One is as correct as the other. They exist simultaneously.
"It's dead, Jim!"
What? Somebody had to say it.
ETA: Well, shit- Alrik beat me to it.
What? Somebody had to say it.
ETA: Well, shit- Alrik beat me to it.
Somebody already did.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Unlike the old timeline where Romulus was destroyed by a supernova.
What? You don't think Vulcan could have gone through the red matter black hole like sand goes through an hour glass?
Think about it.
If you stick a big rock in the top of the hour glass is it going to go through to the bottom? it would need breaking down into dust first, would it turn back into a rock at the bottom? NO.
Obviously not.
Yes, I have and I wasn't that impressed.
Quonos wrote:
Why must stating an opinion always result in a personal attack? Lack of arguments?
As for the "new" or more correct alternate timeline, it sucks. Therefore I dismiss it, just like every day when I thow out garbage.
Unlike the old timeline where Romulus was destroyed by a supernova.
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Lynx, how do you interpret this as an "attack"? You do prefer the Old Timeline, right? And you aren't planning on reading anything or watching any movies that use the new timeline, right? You're throwing it out "like garbage," right? You are in fact living, metaphorically at least, in the Old Timeline. So...where's the attack? You were teased a bit, maybe.
Lynx, how do you interpret this as an "attack"? You do prefer the Old Timeline, right? And you aren't planning on reading anything or watching any movies that use the new timeline, right? You're throwing it out "like garbage," right? You are in fact living, metaphorically at least, in the Old Timeline. So...where's the attack? You were teased a bit, maybe.
We need to remember that possibly the Romulan ship and the Jellyfish has such strong gravity generators and structrual-integrity that they can negate the forces of a blackhole (spaghetification, specificily.)
The planet, however, has neither of these things. The black hole also was formed INSIDE the planet. The planet pretty much imploded. If we ignore the spaghetification effect and just assume this was a simple "hole in space" the planet may have just traveled through it if it he "red matter" device was used on the outside of th planet and its core.
Vulcan is gone. If it DID come out of the "otherside" of this "black hole" like Spock and Nero did, it came out as clumps of dirt and rock.
The planet, however, has neither of these things. The black hole also was formed INSIDE the planet. The planet pretty much imploded. If we ignore the spaghetification effect and just assume this was a simple "hole in space" the planet may have just traveled through it if it he "red matter" device was used on the outside of th planet and its core.
Vulcan is gone. If it DID come out of the "otherside" of this "black hole" like Spock and Nero did, it came out as clumps of dirt and rock.
It's times like this were I think a complete ''RE-BOOT'' would have worked a lot BETTER! then the whole time-travel alternate reality plot!
Re: I don't think Vulcan was really destroyed
Romulus destroyed? No way, it existed in TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT and even in that not-so-good "Nemesis" movie and all those events did take place after the events in the new movie.
So any "destruction" of Romulus is going out with the rest of the garbage.
If you stick a big rock in the top of the hour glass is it going to go through to the bottom? it would need breaking down into dust first, would it turn back into a rock at the bottom? NO.
Obviously not.
Yes, I have and I wasn't that impressed.
Quonos wrote:
Why must stating an opinion always result in a personal attack? Lack of arguments?
As for the "new" or more correct alternate timeline, it sucks. Therefore I dismiss it, just like every day when I thow out garbage.
Unlike the old timeline where Romulus was destroyed by a supernova.
Romulus destroyed? No way, it existed in TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT and even in that not-so-good "Nemesis" movie and all those events did take place after the events in the new movie.
So any "destruction" of Romulus is going out with the rest of the garbage.
Similar threads
