You won't be sorry. I won a copy at ST Mission NY a couple of weeks ago, and I've been enjoying it quite a bit. Lots of new info in there!if this thread was a stealth advert for 50YM Pt. 2 then it was a complete success, OP
book's on my wishlist.
Yeah, Terry Ferrell told a story about Berman in 50YM Pt. 2 that I found rather shocking.But I can't say the same for Berman, at least from the stories I've heard coming from DS9 crew like Behr, Moore, and Terry Ferrell
And after Bajor decided they weren't interested in joining the Federation.
Yeah, Terry Ferrell told a story about Berman in 50YM Pt. 2 that I found rather shocking.
I've long doubted aspects of how Terry Farrell described her dealings with Berman. There is a lot of CYA in her details, and they seem to have changed over the years. What did she want? A deal like Meaney's, that would allow her to go film elsewhere upon occasion? To be a recurring character, which would not have required a contract? The ability to work concurrently on another series? And if she were looking for flexibility in her time, why did she not seek Behr support first? ISB seemed to have been accommodating when it came to the interests of his talent, and he could advocated for Farrell in a way that made sense for the show. I suspect that she really just started negotiations with the desire for more money, and her position changed thereafter.Yeah, Terry Ferrell told a story about Berman in 50YM Pt. 2 that I found rather shocking.
So that would excuse the behavior?But people seem to completely forget all the impressive work he did; also that he WAS in charge of all Trek
So that would excuse the behavior?
IF IT'S TRUE - Berman's always been too decent to respond to a lot of this nonsense, but I'd love for him to finally release his book so as to allow some sort of retort
This is not a question about the good he did. We can grant a certain stewardship of the franchise and a role in creating these series. However, he can equally be responsible for factors that led to inconsistency or decline in quality or anything that led to people on the show functioning beneath their capacity. ETA: we also must recognize that no one person was alone in making the TNG era series successuful (or rescuing them, as the case may be).No (IF IT'S TRUE - Berman's always been too decent to respond to a lot of this nonsense, but I'd love for him to finally release his book so as to allow some sort of retort), but the way some people go on you'd think he'd never done a good thing in his life.
ETA: we also must recognize that no one person was alone in making the TNG era series successuful (or rescuing them, as the case may be).
The best example of this attitude; that the Federation is great but still flawed (presumably an analogy of US/Western society) is the famous Root Beer Scene between Quark and Garak in The Way of the Warrior. Ron Moore added it to the episode since they were three minutes short; turned into one of the best scenes of the season.I don't agree that Behr isn't a fan of Star Trek's vision of a progressive, optimistic future. It's that he's an artist first and recognizes that storytelling is built on conflict, and that a story about a better future eventually has to challenge and deconstruct that better world in order to reaffirm it. People who are saints because they always have the ability to easily make good choices are not good subjects of a story, nor good examples of a positive future.
SPOILER ALERT!After. Also after it was revealed Admiral Ross was working with Section 31.
I think we can go further than that: DS9, thanks to Behr, did more to elucidate the universe in which Trek was set. How does the economy work? What was the trajectory of social justice? What does it mean to live in a diverse society? How does one construct meaning in one's life post-scarcity? These questions are explored better without the hand-waving.that the Federation is great but still flawed
I think we can go further than that: DS9, thanks to Behr, did more to elucidate the universe in which Trek was set. How does the economy work? What was the trajectory of social justice? What does it mean to live in a diverse society? How does one construct meaning in one's life post-scarcity? These questions are explored better without the hand-waving.
I've long doubted aspects of how Terry Farrell described her dealings with Berman. There is a lot of CYA in her details, and they seem to have changed over the years. What did she want? A deal like Meaney's, that would allow her to go film elsewhere upon occasion? To be a recurring character, which would not have required a contract? The ability to work concurrently on another series? And if she were looking for flexibility in her time, why did she not seek Behr support first? ISB seemed to have been accommodating when it came to the interests of his talent, and he could advocated for Farrell in a way that made sense for the show. I suspect that she really just started negotiations with the desire for more money, and her position changed thereafter.
In Hollywood this is too often true. Probably everyone in the industry is responsible to some extent (i.e. a lot depends on who agents chose to promote), but it's part of why female movie stars find it harder to get roles as they age, and why we don't get female equivalents to the various funny-looking-but-charismatic male stars.Laying the blame on Bermans door is popular. But he doesn't help himself.
"Women are either good actresses or they're beautiful."
I heard once from somebody -- I forget who -- that Berman found Behr physically intimidating (he's a pretty big, tough-looking guy) and thus had trouble saying "no" to him.
Working with Ron Moore on Outlander.What's he doing these days?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.