• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

how would you reboot star trek?

Honestly I don't think a total reboot will work simply because how do you shitcan nearly 1,000 published episodes?

Even Doctor Who, who had a soft reboot in 2005, didn't trash the entire history

The JJ movies were a reboot in all but name.

The modern era of DISCO and SNW is being retconned so much that Trek will be pretty much rebooted by the end of the SNW series finale.

Shitcan thousands of hours of Trek? I'll tell you the same thing I've been told on here whenever we've complained about Trek's changes. Those thousands of hours still exist. You can still go back and reread, re-watch, re-experience everything that has come before in Trek. Yeah, I find that answer a little lame, but it has merit.

Everything can be rebooted.

I like JMS idea of a Trek reboot he presented back in 2004. https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...dfc50c3115988f/1612491018175/ST2004Reboot.pdf A reboot along the lines of Ron Moore's BSG reboot. Clean slate. All the same pieces and parts only a little shuffled and rearranged. A series long arc that ties various TOS episodes and locations and races into one story.

On the other hand, I've felt that Trek never needed rebooted. The universe is so big that it can contain countless stories. Continue the tradition of a new ship and new crew. No need to reinvent the wheel.

I think nostalgia hngs around Trek's neck like a stone. There was no need for Trek 09 to be about the TOS crew. Hard core fans would watch regardless and casual fans can easily grasp the concept of a new crew. Let them tell their own stories and come up with their own ideas using their own ship and crew.

I liked the idea of a 32nd century series. That was a reboot without the reboot. It's a completely new galaxy from a political and cultural story standpoint.
 
If the time comes (it's not going to be any time soon), and they have the chance, they should do a complete, total reboot. What if Star Trek was thought up at whenever that point would be, instead of 1964? Then I'd go from there. It wouldn't be a sequel, prequel, or spinoff to anything else. No split-timeline either, as that's trying to have it both ways. Reboot would mean REBOOT.

Batman (1966), Batman (1989), Batman Begins (2005), and The Batman (2022) have nothing to do with each other. A reboot of Star Trek would similarly have nothing to do with what went before.
The promotional material should say, 'This is a reboot, get over it'. And watch the rabid fans heads explode!
 
How would I reboot Star Trek?

First, I would designated the divergence point of the timeline. No more moving the Eugenics Wars/WW3/Post Nuclear Horror around to suit the tendency to keep Star Trek connected to current events. Events progress from that event in to the future, and there's not changing it.

Second, I would be extrapolating from current technology to fill out and ground against some of the more magical elements, like the transporter, warp drive, humanoid aliens.

Third, I would put it out and away from Earth. Earth will be referred to but not seen. And no time travel to past Earth.

Finally, have fun.
 
My take:

SETTING:
Early 26th-Century. Eighty years after the devastating Earth-Vulcan War that brought Humanity to the brink of annihilation, the United Federation of Earth has arisen. There are approximately thirteen member worlds and colonies in the newly-formed Federation spread out among the Sol, Alpha Centauri, and Groombridge Sectors. The starship-based Starfleet Command and the planetary-oriented Starcorps Command serves as Earth's deep-space services. Earth has an uneasy peace with the Vulcans, but enjoys trade treaties with Andorians, Tellarites, Rigellians, etc. The Star Trek Program is the Earth government's newly-announced deep-space exploration and colonization initiative that not everyone thinks is a good idea since a similar earlier program (Project "To Boldly Go...") is largely blamed for initiating the Earth-Vulcan War. Opponents to the Star Trek Program argue that the resources of both Starfleet and Starcorps would be better used for fixing problems at home.

THE SHIP:
UFS Enterprise, NHC-17. Yorktown-class heavy cruiser. Crew: 437. Top speed: Warp Factor 7.8. Armed with phaser banks and photon torpedoes and defended by deflector energy shields, the Enterprise is technically a battlecruiser, but she is just as much an exploration vessel, a diplomatic ship, and a logistical transport. As a long-range starship, the there isn't much the Enterprise can't do. In addition to seven aerospace shuttlecraft, the Enterprise is also equipped with a matter-energy teleportal system that allows near-instant personnel & equipment transport over relatively short distances. Powerful subspace sensor and communication systems allows the Enterprise to see and talk with distant worlds. Only a few weeks out of the spaceyards, the Enterprise is Starfleet's newest heavy cruiser and features the latest shipboard technology and amenities.

THE CREW:
Mostly Human, the 437 souls aboard the Enterprise represent many of Earth's races and cultures and is almost split evenly between men and women. Many are Starfleet's best and brightest, but there are also many down-to-earth everymen among the crew.
MAIN CHARACTERS:
  • CAPTAIN ROBERT A. WINTER: British male, early 40s. A veteran of the Orion Pirate Wars of twenty years ago, he alternates between being a brilliant battle-hardened tactician and a total goofball. He often allows adversaries to underestimate him. If the Doctor from Doctor Who was a Starfleet captain, he'd be like him.
  • COMMANDER SAMARA N. UHURA: African-Canadian female, mid 30s. A former wunderkind, she graduated at the top of her Starfleet Academy class with honors, but spent years as the youngest instructor there. The Enterprise is her first deep-space assignment and she embraces it with an adventurous spirit that is borderline reckless, especially as the ship's first officer.
  • DOCTOR JOTARO ICHIRO, M.D.: Japanese male, late 40s. Served with Winter aboard the UFS Voyager during the Pirate Wars and is something of a smart-ass older brother. A resourceful chief medical officer with a background in advanced biochemistry, he has the ability to develop new medicines and surgical techniques on the fly. When not busy in sickbay, Doctor Ichiro often acts as the ship's chief psychologist, as the crew's emotional welfare also fall under his duties.
  • LIEUTENANT SPOCK: Vulcan male, mid 20s. Like all Vulcans, Spock exhibits pointed ears, upswept eyebrows, and superhuman strength. As part of the officer exchange program between Starfleet and the Vulcan High Command, Spock was assigned to the Enterprise as the ship's chief sciences officer and wasn't given a choice in the matter. He doesn't particularly like Humans, finds them annoying and rude, but his Vulcan pride won't allow him to request a transfer. He is both baffled and intrigued by First Officer Uhura's unabashed zest for life.
  • PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS JOSE O. DIEGO: Hispanic-American male, late 20s. Previously a corporal in Starcorps, Diego accepted a promotion and transfer to Starfleet, where he discovered things were noticeably more casual and there was a higher percentage of people wearing skirts while on standard duty. As the Enterprise's chief security specialist, Diego is generally the strong silent type and never shies away from a fight, but is totally awkward and clumsy around women.
Other positions such as chief engineer, chief communications officer, head nurse, chief helm officer, etc., will be filled in with rotating/reoccurring characters and will only appear when needed in a story. Some may become main characters later if they become popular enough. Although the series will have a lot of action-adventure, drama, and frequent food for thought, it is the characters and their interactions that will be the primary driving force for most stories.
 
I'd stay pretty basic with it. Kirk, Spock, McCoy, the Enterprise, etc. Mostly standalone stories with some over-arcing subplots, but I wouldn't want to get bogged down in huge story arcs. I'd give the supporting characters like Scotty, Uhura, Sulu, and Chekov more development.

And I suppose I'd introduce a regular/recurring security chief. And they'd definitely be a female character, both for variety's sake and because we didn't get to see Tasha Yar on TNG for very long.

And I'd give David Gerrold an open invitation to write for the show if he'd like.
 
I'd recommend reading the Star Wolf books because it's an interesting insight in to some of Gerrold's ideas for Trek.
I've read the first one, Voyage of the Star Wolf, and I have a copy of his novel adaptation of Blood and Fire, but I've never gotten my hands on Middle of Nowhere, the second book in the series.
 
They've had four chances to do a Full Reboot.

1979: The least likely since the TOS Cast was still alive, only middle-aged, and able to play the parts for TMP.

1987: As much as TNG was treated like a clean slate, it still acknowledged TOS. And the title itself, "The Next Generation", means that it's following something!

2009: This was the closest they came to doing a Full Reboot. Old Trek was dead. 1966-2005. They had no reason to connect to it at all. Except they wanted to have Leonard Nimoy, and splitting the timeline at Kirk's birth was a powerful way to begin the movie.

2017: DSC Season 1 was intended to be a Visual Reboot only. In the years since then, they've backtracked on that visual reboot as much as they could.

I think when the fifth time arrives, they're not going to commit to doing a Full Reboot then either. So this is all academic. They'll visually tweak & un-tweak things; and they'll keep updating what the 21st Century was like, so that what happens in Star Trek's History always happens later than the time we're currently living in.

Let the prospect of Mutually Assured Destruction keep World War III in "The Future".
 
Last edited:
The only way to really do a Trek reboot effectively would be to make it a diamond-hard reboot, keeping the very core basics of the franchise and little else – some of the alien species, Starfleet, the Federation as an interstellar polity, perhaps even a starship named Enterprise, but no Kirk, Picard, etc, and certainly no exact repeat of the "status quo" but in a slightly different order. The nearest thing I've seen to a Trek reboot in all but name is The Orville, which used a whole host of Trek ideas (the main characters are humans and aliens who are in a Starfleet expy which is the space exploratory force of a Federation expy, they travel in a FTL spaceship in a galaxy where such technology is ubiquitous, etc) but for obvious reasons couldn't use the original names and concepts, so on many levels worked as a Trek 'remix' of sorts.
 
The only way to really do a Trek reboot effectively would be to make it a diamond-hard reboot, keeping the very core basics of the franchise and little else – some of the alien species, Starfleet, the Federation as an interstellar polity, perhaps even a starship named Enterprise, but no Kirk, Picard, etc, and certainly no exact repeat of the "status quo" but in a slightly different order. The nearest thing I've seen to a Trek reboot in all but name is The Orville, which used a whole host of Trek ideas (the main characters are humans and aliens who are in a Starfleet expy which is the space exploratory force of a Federation expy, they travel in a FTL spaceship in a galaxy where such technology is ubiquitous, etc) but for obvious reasons couldn't use the original names and concepts, so on many levels worked as a Trek 'remix' of sorts.
I expect an actual reboot to not borrow so heavily from the look and feeling of the Berman Era. From the sound of it, the show ultimately became Seth MacFarlane's version of a Rick Berman Star Trek series.
 
They've had four chances to do a Full Reboot.

1979: The least likely since the TOS Cast was still alive, only middle-aged, and able to play the parts for TMP.

1987: As much as TNG was treated like a clean slate, it still acknowledged TOS. And the title itself, "The Next Generation", means that it's following something!

2009: This was the closest they came to doing a Full Reboot. Old Trek was dead. 1966-2005. They had no reason to connect to it at all. Except they wanted to have Leonard Nimoy, and splitting the timeline at Kirk's birth was a powerful way to begin the movie.

2017: DSC Season 1 was intended to be a Visual Reboot only. In the years since then, they've backtracked on that visual reboot as much as they could.

I think when the fifth time arrives, they're not going to commit to doing a Full Reboot then either. So this is all academic. They'll visually tweak & un-tweak things; and they'll keep updating what the 21st Century was like, so that what happens in Star Trek's History always happens later than the time we're currently living in.

Let the prospect of Mutually Assured Destruction keep World War III in "The Future".
You forgot that the The Wrath of Khan was a soft-reboot as well.
 
I didn't. I don't see TWOK that way. I see it as more like they just quietly ignored TMP. There's nothing in TWOK that directly contradicts it, so it's more like a, "Don't ask, don't tell."
TWOK was a reintroduction of the TOS crew in the same vein that TMP was. Just with maroon monsters and militarization.

To the OP, my TOS reboot will have James R. Kirk.
 
Enterprise - I'd have it dealing with World War 3 fallout, early Vulcan collaboration, Federation dynamics, focusing more on Trip, Shran, T'Pol

TOS - I would make it more of an ensemble piece

TNG - is more of a slice of life story

DS9 - unable to escape, it's about O'Brien's family and crew living in the middle of warzone

Voy - tracks their journey back home through several decades
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top