Re: The Vagina Captain's Logs
Why?
HRHTheKING said:
To be honest, I don't think Janeway swung that way.
Why?
HRHTheKING said:
To be honest, I don't think Janeway swung that way.
Guy Gardener said:
O! I get it! You think Mark and that bloke from Workforce who was the pappy from Charmed were both trannies?
Guartho said:
That's also why he eventually ends up with Seven. In addition to being the only available woman with the capacity to recreate that link she also has no previous sexual experience and has a serious medical need to keep from getting too excited. Lucky Chakotay is covered on both fronts.
HRHTheKING said:
I don't know. Just a feeling. A hunch.
The driving factor in the way women leaders are perceived, experiments show, is not that they are any more ruthless than men who get to the top, but that people have strong and often unconscious conceptions about men, women and the nature of leadership.
Experiments show that women vying for leadership roles are automatically assigned two labels. The first is to be seen as nice and warm, but incompetent; the second is to be seen as competent but unpleasant. Women stuck with Label A cannot be leaders, because the stereotype of leadership is incompatible with incompetence. Women who do become leaders get stuck with Label B, because if leadership is unconsciously associated with manliness, cognitive consistency requires that female leaders be stripped of the caring qualities normally associated with women.
Heilman proved that the reason people see a highly competent woman as less likable than a man with precisely the same qualifications is that such women are automatically perceived to have lost their feminine, caring side.
Nancy Pelosi, Janet Reno, Condoleezza Rice, Madeleine Albright . . . I cannot see myself -- we are speaking metaphorically here -- cuddling up to any of them. They all seem formidable, off-putting, cold.
Which suggests the problem here is not so much them as me. And, if I may be so bold, we. As in, we seem unable to synthesize the idea that a woman can be smart, businesslike, demanding, capable, in charge, and yet also, warm.
Was Bill Clinton never brusque? Does Dick Cheney always say thank you and please?
But it's different, isn't it, because she's a woman? With the men, toughness reads as leadership, authority, getting things done. With her it reads as ''bitch.'' There is a sense -- and even women buy into this -- that a woman who climbs too high in male-dominated spheres violates something fundamental to our understanding of what it means to be a woman. Indeed, that she gives up any claim upon femininity itself.
We demand certain ''feminine'' traits from women -- nurturing, caring, submission -- and the woman in whom those traits are either not present or subordinated to her drive, ambition and competence will pay a social price.
Guy Gardener said:
Just this morning I was watching the episode of Ally McBeal where Richard Fish hits on, and fingers Janet Reno's waddle. There's reams of dialog in there about how women with power are sexy.
Guy Gardener said:
Just this morning I was watching the episode of Ally McBeal where Richard Fish hits on, and fingers Janet Reno's waddle. There's reams of dialog in there about how women with power are sexy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.