There may be hundreds of Starfleet ships, but few Constitution class. I might think a wargame exercise would not be incentive for a major enemy incursion .
This could have all been easier if the Constellation were just NCC-1710. One production decision 5 decades ago turned NCCs into anarchy.
No, the Federation in the first TOS season was Gene Roddenberry's vision of basically a Earth dominated republic (or Empire) with a few secondary alien species. In the second season that change to Dorothy Fontana's vision of the Federation as a analogy for the United Nations.The Federation symbolizes the United States, starships symbolize aircraft carriers.
Not really, Kirk said there were only twelve ships similar to the Enterprise, he never said that the Enterprise and the other twelve were the only ships Starfleet had.Going by the idea that there were over a hundred but only 12 by 2267, that would indicate some massive, terrible event
LIKE12.
"Twelve like it."
Not "Twelve others like it."
How ever many D-7's the Klingons had, you can bet the Federation had that number of Connie's. They were in a cold war and weren't going to show a weak hand to their enemy.
It appears that the intention was that the D7 was equal to the Connies (the novelisation of TMP indicates that the refit to the K'Tinga was to bring the specs up to the refit Enterprise), but from both TMP and the Kobyashi Maru simulation, it seems that the Klingons have the ability to operate them regularly in squadrons of three.
Now of course we don't know if these are special circumstances (intercepting V'Ger in the former and a deliberate planned ambush in the latter), or if having a more martial society the Klingons just produced more D7 starships in lieu of smaller vessels, whereas Starfleet is more diverse. The fact that they actually produce enough D7s to be able to sell some to the Romulans may be of some indication here that they are able to produce them at a higher rate than the Federation can make Connies. Not due to better manufacturing techniques but more to the "no-frills" design of Klingon ships.
Had the budget allowed I have no doubt we would have seen examples of numerous various Federation designs in TOS, in all likelihood some of the established on-screen Connies may have even been different designs.
I've seen that in many manuals and novels over the years, but it doesn't really mesh with the Enterprise effortlessly smashing a D7 in TOS-R "Errand of Mercy"It appears that the intention was that the D7 was equal to the Connies (the novelisation of TMP indicates that the refit to the K'Tinga was to bring the specs up to the refit Enterprise),
I've seen that in many manuals and novels over the years, but it doesn't really mesh with the Enterprise effortlessly smashing a D7 in TOS-R "Errand of Mercy"
What I don't understand is if they went to the trouble of creating a new decal that said "Constellation" then how much more difficult would it have been to make another digit for the registry, such as a 3 or a 4 so it could have been 1703 or 1704? Apparently they made it 1017 because they just rearranged the 1701 decal.
Not really, Kirk said there were only twelve ships similar to the Enterprise, he never said that the Enterprise and the other twelve were the only ships Starfleet had.
I've seen that in many manuals and novels over the years, but it doesn't really mesh with the Enterprise effortlessly smashing a D7 in TOS-R "Errand of Mercy"
Ticonderoga class cruiser: 22 active14 vessels is already a lot for a capital ship in naval terms.
Without supplying details, we're not even sure what "like her" even means. There could be 30 Constitution class ships, but only 12 have the Block II retrofits needed to sustain the larger crew and science payload for a 5 year mission (the other 18 have slightly better armament and both smaller cargo bays and run with a crew of 150 to 200 at most).In fairness, we have to assume the words are true, or canon is thrown into chaos. But why can no one in the Star Trek universe ever misspeak, or round off, or be wrong?
I didn't know they made another "Constellation" decal. As far as I remember they actually went out and BOUGHT a commercial Star Trek model kit and modified that to be the Constellation, in which case the name would only have been visible in TOS-R. Could be I'm misremembering, but my understanding was that between the doomsday machine, the Klingon D7 and the asteroid Yonada their modeling budget was down to the director's pocket change and they had to improvise their asses off.What I don't understand is if they went to the trouble of creating a new decal that said "Constellation" then how much more difficult would it have been to make another digit for the registry, such as a 3 or a 4 so it could have been 1703 or 1704? Apparently they made it 1017 because they just rearranged the 1701 decal.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.