So I'm curious about the number of you who thought the writers handled things. I know better than 75% liked the show a lot, but that number might not necessarily be directly proportionate to the number of people who thought they could have handled things differently.
Take me, for instance. I voted the show as excellent. I laughed, I cried (a lot) and overall I thought it was very powerful. However, I also think they writers could have been a little clearer on certain mysteries and maybe detailed the stakes out a bit more.
So the question is this:
How did the writers do for you?
Take me, for instance. I voted the show as excellent. I laughed, I cried (a lot) and overall I thought it was very powerful. However, I also think they writers could have been a little clearer on certain mysteries and maybe detailed the stakes out a bit more.
So the question is this:
How did the writers do for you?
), Richard is revealed to be Locke's father (well, not really), something really wacky that we could speculate about for years to come. In fact, it's rather strange that the show didn't end on an unresolved cliffhanger.