No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
Aye, it was total bullshit. The really sad part of it is that if they had actually CARED enough about Trek to watch a couple TNG Romulan episodes, the JJ team would have known that Romulan ships are basically powered by small contained singularities, so...
All the Romulans would have had to do, is fly an unmanned Warbird into the supernova...
Here's what I think on red matter, the vortex it creates, and the Hobus supernova.
Basically, the Hobus supernova was NOT the cause of the potential galaxy-destroying wavefront...at least, not by itself. Rather, the star was sitting on a right smack on a spatial/subspace/temporal rift. The star's explosion was kind of like blowing up a nuke in a fault line--which may not cause that sort of effect in real life, granted, but the imagery works. The energy of the supernova screwed up the rift it was sitting on, and THAT is what allowed the explosion to propagate much further, and with much greater force, than it should've been able to do in that amount of time had it been just the supernova itself. You may even have had energy coming out of the rift itself, adding further fuel to the fire.
Enter red matter. I don't think that what we see is all there is to red matter, because it must operate on extradimensional levels. Whatever its nature is, it's capable of doing the exact opposite of the rift I described, and therefore being able to reverse the explosion if deployed quickly enough and in the right spot. It also demonstrates the ability to at least temporarily open what may be colloquially referred to as a black hole, but is in fact something other than that (despite having intense gravitational forces and an "event horizon" at least in the sense that there's a point where, once crossed, a ship is forced into free fall into the rift and cannot hit escape velocity)--it's a spatiotemporal rift that, instead of exploding outward, pulls inward.
Yes, it's convoluted...but it's the only way to get things to make sense.
Here's what I think on red matter, the vortex it creates, and the Hobus supernova.
Basically, the Hobus supernova was NOT the cause of the potential galaxy-destroying wavefront...at least, not by itself. Rather, the star was sitting on a right smack on a spatial/subspace/temporal rift. The star's explosion was kind of like blowing up a nuke in a fault line--which may not cause that sort of effect in real life, granted, but the imagery works. The energy of the supernova screwed up the rift it was sitting on, and THAT is what allowed the explosion to propagate much further, and with much greater force, than it should've been able to do in that amount of time had it been just the supernova itself. You may even have had energy coming out of the rift itself, adding further fuel to the fire.
Enter red matter. I don't think that what we see is all there is to red matter, because it must operate on extradimensional levels. Whatever its nature is, it's capable of doing the exact opposite of the rift I described, and therefore being able to reverse the explosion if deployed quickly enough and in the right spot. It also demonstrates the ability to at least temporarily open what may be colloquially referred to as a black hole, but is in fact something other than that (despite having intense gravitational forces and an "event horizon" at least in the sense that there's a point where, once crossed, a ship is forced into free fall into the rift and cannot hit escape velocity)--it's a spatiotemporal rift that, instead of exploding outward, pulls inward.
Yes, it's convoluted...but it's the only way to get things to make sense.
This is the kind of plot-hole patching I approve of.Just throwing one's hands up and saying "man what"... I just don't dig that at all.
![]()
How does red matter stop a supernova?
One of my issues with the movie (and I had a lot of them).How does red matter stop a supernova?
Don't insult my intelligence by creating gimmicky plot devices just to make a segment more digestible. There were better ways to weave this into the story. Simply call it an "artificial singularity" and leave out the "red" matter.
~String
Agreed. "Red matter" sounds like the sort of jargon a real future organization might use, as opposed to "artificial quantum singularity".
Here's what I think on red matter, the vortex it creates, and the Hobus supernova.
Basically, the Hobus supernova was NOT the cause of the potential galaxy-destroying wavefront...at least, not by itself. Rather, the star was sitting on a right smack on a spatial/subspace/temporal rift. The star's explosion was kind of like blowing up a nuke in a fault line--which may not cause that sort of effect in real life, granted, but the imagery works. The energy of the supernova screwed up the rift it was sitting on, and THAT is what allowed the explosion to propagate much further, and with much greater force, than it should've been able to do in that amount of time had it been just the supernova itself. You may even have had energy coming out of the rift itself, adding further fuel to the fire.
Enter red matter. I don't think that what we see is all there is to red matter, because it must operate on extradimensional levels. Whatever its nature is, it's capable of doing the exact opposite of the rift I described, and therefore being able to reverse the explosion if deployed quickly enough and in the right spot. It also demonstrates the ability to at least temporarily open what may be colloquially referred to as a black hole, but is in fact something other than that (despite having intense gravitational forces and an "event horizon" at least in the sense that there's a point where, once crossed, a ship is forced into free fall into the rift and cannot hit escape velocity)--it's a spatiotemporal rift that, instead of exploding outward, pulls inward.
Yes, it's convoluted...but it's the only way to get things to make sense.
This is the kind of plot-hole patching I approve of.Just throwing one's hands up and saying "man what"... I just don't dig that at all.
![]()
All I can say is...I'm a fanficcer. I can't help myself--plothole patching is what I do for fun!![]()
From the blu ray subtitles:Umm, but how about answering my question? Sorry to be a bother, but I'd really like to hear the actual dialogue and not to hear the bits from the comic.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.