There likely will never will be an objectively correct way to do nostalgia, It's something we really have to live with as fans. You could say "less is more", which is often a fair common ground. But then again, how do you define "less" or "more" when it comes to wanting to see the things you love?
&
This.
I think the references/nostalgia bits only enhanced the season and they... by and large... made sense and advanced the plot, or at least added more emotional depth. It could have been without at least some of it and would have still been good, and quite frankly still the best season of anything in the Kurtzman-era.
Maybe i'm weird, I really don't mind "fan service". I'm a fan. Service me. I don't think it's a terrible thing to give... fans... what they want?
I mean, look... Was "All Good Things..." full of nostalgia for "Encounter at Farpoint"? Was "Emissary" full of nostalgia for "Best of Both Worlds"? PS3 brought TNG full circle, touching back to Farpoint, AGT, GEN, FC, and NEM.
What were people expecting? TPTB to double down on the deconstructionist fan antagonism of PS1? Aside from a few vocal elements, PS3 was the most broadly well received and least polarizing season of any NuTrek. Most legacy fans were pleased. Most NuTrek fans also at least liked it a bit.
Sure, the restored E-D was a stretch, but does it make sense in-universe? The Shatnerverse novel "The Return" introduced the idea of retrieving the saucer because Veridian IV had a pre-warp society. If you have to go through all the effort to retrieve the saucer (and if the saucer is designed to be recoverable) why not put such a famous ship in a museum since it has to go somewhere anyway? And if the new head of said museum happens to have a personal interest in the ship and post-scarcity resources are available, why not restore it?
I gave "Vox" like a 6/10 for rushing part of the plot, being so senseless with the body count, and opening the Jack mystery box too late. I'm not saying the season is perfect, but it is far better than most of what we've gotten post-2005.
PS3 has ~less~ homework than PS1 or PS2. It has far less "memberberries" than STLD. Aside from needing to know the details of "Preemptive Strike", you just need broad basic knowledge of the franchise's greatest hits.
Is having canonically accurate legacy ships at the fleet museum really worth all the OMG nostalgia pearl clutching?
Making the Titan the next Enterprise seemed the most gratuitous part from my perspective, as I enjoyed the idea of it being the little ship that could. Technically, the ship remains the same, but there's a certain expectation with a ship called Enterprise. Titan as the underdog could make for great stories where it's limitations encourage an extra amount of ingenuity from the crew.
I think they got trapped selling Patrick Stewart on renaming it the USS Picard. Then when they wanted to pivot, they had to change the name to something and went with Enterprise. Is it the best thing they could have done? No, but again it does bring TNG full circle by sending a new generation out on a new Enterprise. If they had 4X the budget they could have had a new ship or something. But with the time and budget constraints they had, it works.
Back in 2002, when they had B-4 trying to sing Blue Skies, I had a feeling they'd bring Data back if they made another movie. That's what we all probably figured. Nemesis flopping made it a moot point, but I wasn't surprised in the slightest when Picard Season 3 actually went through with it.
OMG, PS3 is completely disrespecting NEM. Had there been a fifth TNG film, what are the odds Brent Spiner
wouldn't have been enticed back?
And the novelverse did something very similar anyway.