For convenience sake I just will quote what I wrote the last time a similar topic came up:
Sorry I didn't find that one.
For convenience sake I just will quote what I wrote the last time a similar topic came up:
I used to have a bigger ST book collection. But I lost some of the books I had in one of my moves. Including, and this is heartbreaking, a copy of Della Van Hise's novel "The Killing Time." I have another copy but the one I lost was autographed by the author.The first two Star Trek books I ever owned were Star Trek 4 and 6, and were purchased at Woolco (now Walmart) in November 1975. So I can honestly say that I read the adaptations of some of the episodes before I saw the episodes themselves. From then until the late '90s, I kept up with each new release (even acquired the original hardcover of Mission to Horatius at a second-hand store).
After that, though, life's circumstances made book-buying a luxury and so I've got huge gaps in my Star Trek collection. And over the years I've made decisions to forego certain miniseries or authors, for various reasons.
These days I'm trying to fill in some of those gaps (thanks, Amazon Marketplace) while being careful not to exceed the rapidly shrinking space available on my bookshelves (if anyone has a spare TARDIS they don't want anymore, I could sure use one...).
I remember when I bought Spock, Messiah!. I was out shopping with my mother, and she was horrified when I picked up a Star Trek book. She followed me to the till and watched as I counted out 7 quarters to pay for it (my babysitting wages at that time were 50 cents/hour, so this represented more than one evening's work). "You don't really want that, do you?" she demanded, hoping I'd change my mind. My mother did not understand science fiction, never mind Star Trek.
I can't imagine re-reading any Diane Carey book more than once. Some of them are so awful I can't imagine re-reading them at all.The one book that I owned was Diane Carey's Final Frontier. The old problem of it being to big for me at too young an age persisted, and I plugged away at it over the course of a couple of months. I never read it properly that first time, skipping backwards and forwards, loosing my place, deliberately skipping the parts that were about the Romulans...it was a mess. I still have that original copy of the book today, it's so beat up! And I did get around to reading it properly, and every 5-7 years I pull it out and read through it.
Odd: I rather like her stuff. Don't particularly care for her politics, and I particularly don't care for her habit of putting extreme libertarianism into Vulcans' mouths, but personally, I regard her "Piper" novels as examples of how much fun a "Mary Sue" can be if it's really done right.I can't imagine re-reading any Diane Carey book more than once. Some of them are so awful I can't imagine re-reading them at all.
I can't imagine re-reading any Diane Carey book more than once. Some of them are so awful I can't imagine re-reading them at all.
Federation is what First Contact should have been. Federation is one of my absolute favorite Star Trek novels, and that's the characterization of Zephram Cochrane that makes sense to me. The one in the movie is just a dumb caricature, and for me the only redeeming part of that movie at all is Lily. I liked her, and how she stood up to Picard.
And that closing bit of Federation...? That's a perfect jumping off place for a new series. It can go literally anywhere.
How did you start reading Trek books and are there people who read Trek before they watched it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.