• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

HBO's "Westworld", starring Anthony Hopkins/produced by J.J. Abrams

The guns themselves prevent "head shots", as we've seen twice now, first with Teddy in The Original and again in this week's episode with Lawrence.
 
I'm officially disturbed that getting shot by a host's gun just makes a little peef on your clothes. What the hell are they shooting that does that, yet still blows holes in androids? Needs explaining.
The only way I can think of to make it sort of work is to have a combination of a bunch of different systems working simultaneously:
— The Simunitions mentioned by Jonathan Nolan in DigirificWriter's post above. They can be filled with some harmless powder that "poofs" and then fades away once it hits you if you're playing in God Mode like Ed Harris, or synthetic blood that leaves a trace if you want to play a game where you can be hit and forced to sit out a while. So everyone, Guest and Host alike, is only hit with these mostly harmless paintball-like munitions.
— Sensors on the Host and Guest guns that prevent them from firing if they're aimed at sensitive areas of the Guest's bodies, like the head or crotch (don't want a lawsuit).
— Special FX explosive squibs under the musculature of the Host's bodies, with smaller explosives for entry wounds surrounded by larger explosives for exit wounds.
— An internal sensor system to register where a Host is shot and create an entry wound and a corresponding exit wound on the other side if applicable.
— Pressurized synthetic blood reservoirs under the skin to simulate bleeding wounds and blood spatter as would happen with a person with a beating heart.
(Alternatively, the 3D-printed Hosts may be a lot more complex and have synthetic analogues for most human organs and bodily functions)
— Explosive squibs in every building, animal (with blood), tree, and piece of scenery to register damage. We saw Ed Harris shoot through a thick adobe wall to hit the Host hiding behind it with the shotgun round from his gun. Also, windows that shatter when shot.
— An army of contractors who go around repairing all the bullet holes everywhere at night while the Hosts are being repaired.
— Knives with blunted edges made of special metamaterials that remain rigid when stabbing a Host but turn flexible and soft if you purposely or accidentally try to stab a Guest.

It would require an enormously complex and logistically inefficient system to operate, and even then will probably not explain every shooting or stabbing incident we see. But since the show is compelling I can suspend my disbelief for that stuff.
 
— Special FX explosive squibs under the musculature of the Host's bodies, with smaller explosives for entry wounds surrounded by larger explosives for exit wounds.
— Explosive squibs in every building, animal (with blood), tree, and piece of scenery to register damage. We saw Ed Harris shoot through a thick adobe wall to hit the Host hiding behind it with the shotgun round from his gun. Also, windows that shatter when shot.
You realize that's, like, a thousand times worse than just having live ammunition, right?
 
You realize that's, like, a thousand times worse than just having live ammunition, right?
So what's your explanation for the fact that bullets just go *poof* when they hit Guests but blow completely through Hosts and thick adobe walls? And I bet we'll see more physical damage to environments in future episodes as well. Nolan already said they use Simunitions.
 
Me too. My problem was with the murdering and raping. People, even in other boards, keep saying "Well, it's like GTA V". But I'm not sure shooting a pile of pixels and shooting with a gun at something that is incredibly similar to a human being, while he/she is begging for mercy and then dies in agony and then raping his/her body are the same thing.

They addressed that difference too, with the one guy who stabbed the host through the hand and was trying to make his friend 'release his inhibitions' and violently kill and rape everything, but his friend found his thing being gentlemanly to Dolores.
 
They addressed that difference too, with the one guy who stabbed the host through the hand and was trying to make his friend 'release his inhibitions' and violently kill and rape everything, but his friend found his thing being gentlemanly to Dolores.
Sometimes I'm a little tired when in a tv show talk about "inhibitions".

If you kill without a valid reason and rape is not because you have no "inhibitions", but because you're a f***ing psycho.
 
So what's your explanation for the fact that bullets just go *poof* when they hit Guests but blow completely through Hosts and thick adobe walls? And I bet we'll see more physical damage to environments in future episodes as well. Nolan already said they use Simunitions.
I didn't offer an explanation. I just said that making everything in the bloody park highly explosive is sort of a waaaaaaaay worse idea than just giving them live ammunition.
 
Sometimes I'm a little tired when in a tv show talk about "inhibitions".

If you kill without a valid reason and rape is not because you have no "inhibitions", but because you're a f***ing psycho.

If the target is a human being, yes. If the target is pixels or robots, possibly not. People can have violent fantasies, never act on them for moral reasons, and not be evil people. That's why we have GTAV.
 
I didn't offer an explanation. I just said that making everything in the bloody park highly explosive is sort of a waaaaaaaay worse idea than just giving them live ammunition.
It's not "highly" explosive, it's a tiny charge (think firecracker packed in dampening material) designed to simulate the splash of bullet impacts on inanimate objects like walls, dirt, trees, and scenery. Actors and stunt people stand near them and run through them, and while there is a marginal risk involved in using them, it's not "way worse than using live ammunition." They even used to be worn on the actors or stunt performers themselves but now it's mostly been replaced with compressed gas packs, but carrying them internally on the Hosts wouldn't be like live people carrying them.
 
Just an odd, random thought all this talk about a mysterious maze and the appearance of a solitary small black church reminds me of the more mystifying moments of LOST in a good way.

In the second episode, we kind of get a hint that there's more going on than we know.
When Ford is up on the surface, he interacts with a young boy who says he's there with his family and his father told him he can do whatever he wants. While not entirely proving he's a guest, it's highly suggested by that dialogue. Anyway, a little later, we see that Ford has a mastery of controlling the hosts when he stops a rattlesnake mid-attack and then commands it to wander off with a wave of his hand. A moment later... he pretty much does the same thing with the young boy, who turns and wanders off with a dazed look on his face.

While I hope they're not going full blown Twilight Zone on us, that kind of suggests that maybe Ford is one of the few humans still alive and everyone else is a host to one degree or another. Especially when coupled with some of the other stuff we've seen, such as the voiceover in the pilot and then the security dude reciting the exact same dialogue later on.
Your "spoiler speculation" doesn't sound all that likely to me given that the show is set in the current (21st) century and we've seen - thanks to that photo of the woman in Times Square - that things don't look much different to how they do now.
The photo doesn't necessarily preclude the women at Time Square isn't human. Different explanations could be offered: Most people on the planet are AI's now and don't remember it; or most people on the planet are AI's and only those in the park of Westworld don't remember it. Huge stretches, I admit, and I certainly don't expect or even necessarily want the show to go in that direction.

All in all, I think Locutus' explanation below makes the most sense:

I got the impression that the little boy was a host Ford created to represent himself as a little boy. There's a little British kid loitering around the one spot in the middle of nowhere where Anthony Hopkins' surface elevator pops up, and near where his secret mystery project is located? And he just hangs around there in the middle of the barren desert with no food or water or horse or parental supervision waiting to have philosophical discussions with Ford? I don't think it was ever meant to imply that he was actually a guest and that Ford can control them because they're secretly all robots, I just think it means Ford created that kid and he sits there waiting until Ford comes to visit anytime he wants to channel his childhood self to contemplate the meaning of existence and the next evolution of the hosts. I bet Ford's parents lived in the American West for a while when he was that age and were neglectful and allowed him to run free in the desert, which was when he first conjured up the idea for the park, and that serves as a touchstone for when he gets new ideas. He came there when Douchy Writer Guy was about to make his presentation which Ford knew he would not be impressed by.
 
An interesting article about the comparison between WestWorld and videogames

The Video Game Horror Of HBO’s Westworld
HBO’s new series Westworld has probably got a lot of people reconsidering their most recent Grand Theft Auto V murder spree.

Reconsidering, though probably not regretting. On the one hand, the first two episodes of HBO’s new sci-fi drama have asked us to at least entertain the idea that the computer-controlled civilians we just mowed down have personalities and inner lives. On the other hand, it comfortingly shows us a fictional form of entertainment so far advanced beyond modern video games that we won’t lose much sleep over the virtual citizens we just killed. Our current video game moral quandaries remain safely abstract and philosophical. GTA’s androids do not yet dream of electric sheep.
 
So what's your explanation for the fact that bullets just go *poof* when they hit Guests but blow completely through Hosts and thick adobe walls? And I bet we'll see more physical damage to environments in future episodes as well. Nolan already said they use Simunitions.
Smart bullets, obviously, that know where they are going, what they are hitting, and what to do with their atomic structure when they get there. That's a whole lot better and simpler than the kind of support and infrastructure required to wire the entire host population and landscape for the chance that a bullet will strike exactly there.

I want to see knives and other implements of destruction addressed on the show.
 
In modern day America, you wouldn't want to replace the politicians. You want to replace those who influence the process with their money. Those people are also the most likely to visit a place like Westworld because of its cost.
That's why I said "other important people." Political, industrial, military, media....

Sometimes I'm a little tired when in a tv show talk about "inhibitions".

If you kill without a valid reason and rape is not because you have no "inhibitions", but because you're a f***ing psycho.
Agreed. I would not want to hang around with a person whose lack of violent behavior is just a result of their inhibitions.
 
Agreed. I would not want to hang around with a person whose lack of violent behavior is just a result of their inhibitions.
Yep. I was a little bewildered when the friend of the decent guy was like "Just relax! Murder or rape someone! Have fun!". He gave me the impression that the only thing that prevents him to do these things in the real world is the fear of being caught.
 
Yep. I was a little bewildered when the friend of the decent guy was like "Just relax! Murder or rape someone! Have fun!". He gave me the impression that the only thing that prevents him to do these things in the real world is the fear of being caught.
To be fair, most modern religions are based upon the same ideology; don't murder, rape, steal, and generally be 'good' or go to Hell or its equivalence.
 
To be fair, most modern religions are based upon the same ideology; don't murder, rape, steal, and generally be 'good' or go to Hell or its equivalence.
What bothers me is how the show suggests that each of us can become a full fledged psychopath if we can be sure that we will suffer no consequences to our actions. I think most people are better than that. People who kill just for fun is only a very small minority of the population. Even serial killers usually have some perverse justification for their actions. God has commanded them to do it or something like that.
 
What bothers me is how the show suggests that each of us can become a full fledged psychopath if we can be sure that we will suffer no consequences to our actions. I think most people are better than that. People who kill just for fun is only a very small minority of the population. Even serial killers usually have some perverse justification for their actions. God has commanded them to do it or something like that.
Don't underestimate the power of gaming on one's mindset. I know there's a huge difference between a video game and what Westworld represents, but at its core it's the same thing, and if one is of the mindset that it's just a step-up from virtual reality, I don't have much problem seeing a lot of people acting like absolute animals if given the chance, and especially the encouragement to do so.
 
Someone suggested a theory to me that those scenes with the two visitors are actually flashbacks of Ed Harris' past, and he's the one in the white hat who eventually becomes the Man in Black. They're making us think they're happening concurrently with the present storyline when they really are set 30 years ago.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top