• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hawkman Movie?

That was a (relatively recent) retcon intended to make sense of Hawkman's continuity and history.
Well the "love story" doesn't actually stretch to Thanagar. The GA/Current version of Hawkman's connection to Thanagar arent that tight. ;)
Nah, but it totally could.

The JSA stuff is so inside-baseball it's ridiculous. It's Prince Khufu, and Nabu, and Teth-Adam, and some Thanagarian? Because Egypt? A tiny place without much history. All the important Egyptians lived in the same ten year timespan. Not that it's a bad story per se, I liked it, but it's continuity porn.

They did do some of the reincarnating stuff in Hawkman's fourth attempt at a ongoing, though. I phased out of comics around this time, so I can't say how entertaining this was. Possibly somewhat? Geoff Johns can't write emotions (that's what's called irony), but James Robinson could at the time, even if his dialogue was the verbal equivalent of Billy walking home from school, and Rags Morales drew some of it, so it was probably okay?

But then I came back, and that's when it gets weird. Also, just abjectly bad, as The Rann-Thanagar War is an awful, awful book.

Looking at the Wikipedia article, it's kind of hilarious how cisgendered Hawkman is through the whole thing. Why would Khufu come back as a girl? That's not how reincarnation works!
 
Iron Man and Thor are major, high profile characters. Hawkman is not.
They might be now, but in the pre movie days they were almost unknown outside of comics fandom.

Very true. I remember when Iron Man was being released, people (maybe even around the TBBS) were sure the movie was going to fail because Iron Man was an unknown property.

Excellent point. Us fanboys and fangirls forget sometimes that while WE may live in a world of Elronds and Andorians and sonic screwdrivers, the rest of the world does not. :)
 
As the original post hints, I think the Hawkman concept might work well as a 1930s-type action/adventure film. Maybe part Rocketeer, part Stargate, part The Mummy.
 
Oh yeah, this'll be right after the Flash movie and the...uh, the Aquaman movie... :guffaw:

If Warners can't make Green Lantern work for them, they'll be stupid not to just stick with Superman and Batman. Wonder Woman, maybe...
 
"Wonder Woman" as a live action film project has been taken off the table by DC Ent I believe. The last thing I read about it is that there doesn't seem to be any interest in it and after the pilot debacle. That being said WW is a more high profile character I would think than "Hawkman".

"Hawkman" is rich in mythology both fictional alien and real Egyptian myth which if the correct writer/s and a director are found could be made to work in an exceptional movie. We know Marvel Studios has a bunch of lesser known character films on the docket in various stages of development. I'm sure DC Ent has their own as well.
 
Iron Man and Thor are major, high profile characters. Hawkman is not.

None of them were household names before the movies.

Ditto for Blade, Hellboy, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, etc.

(And even with some of the "newer" characters, there are generational factors involved. My parents know Batman and Superman and Wonder Woman, but had no idea who the X-Men were . . . .)
 
while i love Hawkman, i think a DTV animated movie would be better. it would be less of a risk at least.
 
^ I don't see that ever in the cards. DC Ent has basically stated that they're only interested in making Batman, Superman, GL, and Justice League centric adaption/original stories for the DTV's. Everything else is too much of a crap shoot for them.

Michael Shanks did a decent job in "Smallville" as Carter Hall.
 
Oh yeah, this'll be right after the Flash movie and the...uh, the Aquaman movie... :guffaw:

If Warners can't make Green Lantern work for them, they'll be stupid not to just stick with Superman and Batman. Wonder Woman, maybe...

Actually I think WB probably would have been smarter to attempt a Flash movie before GL. He's probably a bit more recognizable to the public, the concept is a lot more straightforward, and his fun personality would seem to be a perfect fit for the movies.

And while his superpower might seem a bit limited at first, with the effects they have now there's probably no end of fantastic, amazing things you could have him do on screen (we got a hint of that with the kid in Incredibles).
 
"The Flash" is still being developed of course and is planned I believe to be DC Ent's film after "Man of Steel'.Flash also has the benefit of being on television as a series while there was very little media exposure for Green Lantern. Just the comic. I think they should have worked to develop the animated series for air before the movie came out.
 
Yeah, Geoff Johns did the treatment for The Flash movie.

Which will go ahead j-u-s-t as planned now, since everything is going so well for Warners on the DC Entertainment front. What other movies has Johns been involved with? :lol:

The problems with GL derail everything that's not being produced by Nolan.

Flash is a dull guy who runs real fast. They'll do better to deep-six that and take another look at something like Wonder Woman, who they know is one of the three most recognizable characters they own.

Or maybe they'll find a safer place to put their money, like talking Rowling into a Harry Potter prequel.
 
Like I said though "Wonder Woman" has been dead since Joss left the project. I personally don't think we'll see a love action WW woman movie this decade. For whatever reason no one can get their act together with regards to Diana. I too agree that she's one of their most recognizable and popular assets.
 
^ I don't see that ever in the cards. DC Ent has basically stated that they're only interested in making Batman, Superman, GL, and Justice League centric adaption/original stories for the DTV's. Everything else is too much of a crap shoot for them.

Michael Shanks did a decent job in "Smallville" as Carter Hall.
i thought Shanks did a good job as well. as much as i enjoy the DTVs i'd love to see them branch out with other characters. at least give the Flash a DTV story. surely the Flash can't be too much of a risk.
 
Like I said though "Wonder Woman" has been dead since Joss left the project. I personally don't think we'll see a love action WW woman movie this decade. For whatever reason no one can get their act together with regards to Diana. I too agree that she's one of their most recognizable and popular assets.

They thought they had other options. They really, really don't...except maybe to try to make some kind of "Justice League" gangbang to leverage the dwarf stars of the DC universe into a payday - but if they don't headline that one with Supes and Batman they're in trouble even there.
 
Iron Man and Thor are major, high profile characters. Hawkman is not.

None of them were household names before the movies.

Ditto for Blade, Hellboy, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, etc.

(And even with some of the "newer" characters, there are generational factors involved. My parents know Batman and Superman and Wonder Woman, but had no idea who the X-Men were . . . .)
I agree.

Nobody knew Luke Skywalker or what a Jedi was till Star Wars came out. I'm all for franchising a film series till the moon leaves orbit, but I'm not convinced familiarity decisively affects profitability.
 
The value of existing characters is their familiarity.

It's true that no one knew what Star Wars and its characters were before 1977. Any time Warners can come up with the next Lucas or Cameron, they can stop worrying about whether or not anyone gives a fuck about Aquaman.
 
"A love action" movie. Rao, I hate typing when I'm tired. Of course I meant LIVE action movie lol. Yeah the only time I could see WW in a movie is part of a future attempt at a "Justice League" movie.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top