• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hartsarb quote:"where it SEEMS like we’re violating canon"

Considering all the work that goes into news reporting, it's maddening when they obviously didn't do the five seconds' worth of research to check basic facts. It's like the time when a news piece on Trek used footage from the Trek fan film "Renegades." :wtf:

For sure, that happened at least once here in L.A. It was for a story in their news' entertainment segment talking about Beyond.
 
#SoundsLikeACopOutInThisAgeOfCGI
#Tarkin
#WeCanRebuildHim

#AtTheVeryLeastGetAnActorThatLooksEvenRemotelyLikeHunter
I loved Rogue One, but the CGI used to recreate Peter Cushing was shaky at best. There are subtleties to human expression that even the best CGI cannot capture. When they first show him and you only see his refection on the glass, that's probably the best it looked for the entire movie.
 
I loved Rogue One, but the CGI used to recreate Peter Cushing was shaky at best. There are subtleties to human expression that even the best CGI cannot capture. When they first show him and you only see his refection on the glass, that's probably the best it looked for the entire movie.

And the CGI Fisher looked downright creepy at the end.
 
I loved Rogue One, but the CGI used to recreate Peter Cushing was shaky at best. There are subtleties to human expression that even the best CGI cannot capture. When they first show him and you only see his refection on the glass, that's probably the best it looked for the entire movie.
Prefer Tarkin over Leia. Thankfully, her scene was mercifully short.
 
Maybe the Discovery show-runners will use the tried and true time travel/alternate time line explanation by saying that the Borg incursion from “First Contact” and/or the “Temporal War” from ST: E explains all the seeming contradictions?
 
No, because the Temporal Cold War and Borg Incursion changed nothing.
But we can’t be sure about that.
Besides, what I’m suggesting is that the term “Prime Universe” is a misnomer. The NX Enterprise, Franklin, and Kelvin are all different/more advanced looking than the TOS Enterprise because the timeline(s) changed much earlier than heretofore revealed.
 
But we can’t be sure about that.
Besides, what I’m suggesting is that the term “Prime Universe” is a misnomer. The NX Enterprise, Franklin, and Kelvin are all different/more advanced looking than the TOS Enterprise because the timeline(s) changed much earlier than heretofore revealed.

The producers/writers considered Enterprise to be in the same timeline as TOS and the other series
 
But we can’t be sure about that.
Besides, what I’m suggesting is that the term “Prime Universe” is a misnomer. The NX Enterprise, Franklin, and Kelvin are all different/more advanced looking than the TOS Enterprise because the timeline(s) changed much earlier than heretofore revealed.
Sure we can. The people who wrote both said so.
They may look more "advanced", but are they? I saw a TOS ship kick the crap out of an Enterprise ship. The NX-01 had no phasers, shields or photon torpedoes, it's transporter wad limited to cargo. So how was it "more advanced"? A slick exterior is worthless, It's what's under the hood that counts.
 
Look, I have no desire to get into a protracted debate here. All I’m saying is that if the new show-runners want to use something from other Trek shows as an excuse to hit the reset button by using time travel as an excuse, or even make up a new story along the same lines, they might do so. That’s all.
 
Look, I have no desire to get into a protracted debate here. All I’m saying is that if the new show-runners want to use something from other Trek shows as an excuse to hit the reset button by using time travel as an excuse, or even make up a new story along the same lines, they might do so. That’s all.
That's the beauty of fiction. Things can change if the show-runners want it to.
 
The most important canon question, will they use sir or Ma’am when referring to a female superior officer?
 
No, because the Temporal Cold War and Borg Incursion changed nothing.

The very idea of a "Temporal Cold War" is ludicrous, because you would already know the winner before it even started.

For example, we know that no future time traveling faction traveled back in time and successfully killed Hitler in infancy.

You can interfere in history all you want, but it will inevitably result in the history we have experienced, and the future we will experience.
 
All I’m saying is that if the new show-runners want to use something from other Trek shows as an excuse to hit the reset button by using time travel as an excuse, or even make up a new story along the same lines, they might do so. That’s all.
Technically there's nothing stopping them, but it does potentially confuse/alienate those who would be completely new to Trek and would never have seen Enterprise, First Contact, etc.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top