• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hartsarb quote:"where it SEEMS like we’re violating canon"

"The thing for the audience to keep in mind as they digest the show is that there may be an episode or a moment where it seems like we’re violating canon ... They need patience, because what we’ll end up doing in another episode is showing them how we're getting around it. So what I would ask from the audience is to consume this series as you would a novel and not make decisions based on a chapter, or on sentences in a particular chapter. This is long-arc storytelling and we're doing things for a reason ... Sometimes it might feel like we’re flirting with controversy, but we have a way around it. [If people] binge the show they’ll see how we're making these plans and how we're paying things off".

Translation: "Discovery is actually a reboot, but because CBS is calling it a prequel to TOS just to get more viewers, I have to make up some bullshit to tell you all about 'violating canon.' "

;)
 
I am guessing that there is some lame "So and So whom we know is alive in TOS "dies" only to be brought back to life in a later episode."
 
Perhaps they could have just done Worf sans ridges? I don't know, TOS Klingon makeup is through a modern lens problematic.

THAT would have been even funnier. Then they could have had someone say to Worf: "What happened? You look so different!", to which Worf replies: "No I don't".
 
"The last thing we want to do is feel like we came into somebody else’s house and took the plates out and moved them somewhere else."

He talks of the Klingons so maybe that is the limits to violating canon. Must have been a pretty good reason (or a lazy one) to mess with expectations of what has already been told. Probably play out as all twisted and how can that possibly keep future Trek true to its story line roots whilst still being in keeping with Discovery.. and then.. the arc kicks in ;) we find out Spock still is Spock but with a messed up family tree and Klingons really did have hair but shaved too much, and it all makes sense again.
 
Well, since they've already thrown continuity out the window with the tumorous "klingons" and ships hundreds of years more advanced then TNG ships (based on the bridges of the starfleet ships), among other things, I don't know what else they can break continuity wise. Outside of, I don't know, specifically blowing up France just to kill Picard's ancestor's before he was born there isn't much more they can mess up that would be a surprise at this point.
No Picard is a win for me :techman:
 
"We are going to be doing a few things that shake hands with TOS in a way that I think are going to be so fun. I think people will be pretty excited about what's coming down the pike."

;)
Awesome!!!! I really need to go read that interview now!
 
Sorry, as the OP I blame SFX for that one. Although I should have known, their reporting on Discovery hasn't been the best. An earlier article said it was set 10 years before TNG....

Considering all the work that goes into news reporting, it's maddening when they obviously didn't do the five seconds' worth of research to check basic facts. It's like the time when a news piece on Trek used footage from the Trek fan film "Renegades." :wtf:

There are lots of examples of commercial news media doing a poor job of reporting on pop culture. ...and everything else, for that matter. :rolleyes:

That's part of the reason why I only get my news from NPR.

Kor
 
I can live with pushing canon a bit especially when it gets rid of fanon fan wank theories. So some of what they said makes me feel a bit better. But at the same time I read stuff like "not changing things that we thought were super-important, like the communicators and tricorder and phaser[.]" I just have to shake my head. There were no phasers or tricorders in "The Cage" era. So it's like they're trying to be a good prequel to Kirk-era, while ignoring the stuff that already exists in the era they're depicting.

But I guess I just need to be patient and they'll have an episode that fixes that.


Ha ha, good catch. #BruceGreenwoodForDiscovery

No. NO!

#JeffreyHunterIsPike
#CGIJeffrey
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top