I voted 1.
I don't enjoy it. I know, how dare I come into the Voyager forum and say that, but I tried to like the show, I really did. I read everything that Star Trek Communicator and Starlog wrote about it before the premiere (whatever happened to "Doc Zimmerman" by the way?) and I really wanted it to be good, because it became obvious during the final season of TNG that the writers had run out of ideas and they were just spinning their wheels until the finale.
I watched "Caretaker" and I liked it. Sure, it had its problems (like why couldn't they have just used the Array to get home and left a bomb behind set to explode after they left, or how all the Maquis were in Starfleet uniforms in the final scene) but they seemed minor because the acting was good and the production values were excellent. And then the first regular episode had a reset-button plot, and it became obvious that UPN, Rick Berman, or whoever called the shots was not going to take this seriously.
Voyager is Star Trek if it were produced by Glen Larson, only with more technobabble. And if you enjoy it, good for you. I mean, my wife just loves Dr. Quinn Medicine Woman and my hatred for it burns hotter than the heat of a thousand suns, but I love her anyway. And since Voyager's shortcomings inspired a lot of what Ron Moore did with BSG, I am thankful for it. I'm just sad that it didn't live up to its amazing potential. Voyager is the Derrick Coleman of Star Trek.