But the "me" thing, that's just being egotistical, not evil. It seems I left egotistical off of my list.......
The egoism and inability to empathy with other peoples is 2/3 of evil.
But the "me" thing, that's just being egotistical, not evil. It seems I left egotistical off of my list.......
Was he evil...or just a Cardassian?
No, I don't really think that's a fair comparison.Not to Godwin this thread, but that's like saying the same thing about Hitler. "Was he evil... or just German". I think we can all agree that there are plenty of perfectly wonderful Germans out there. I'm pretty sure the same can be said for Cardassians.
I don't think that those are mutually exclusive. Someone can feel loss entirely on the basis of what has gone missing from their lives, but less for the suffering that the person felt themselves.But the "me" thing, that's just being egotistical, not evil. It seems I left egotistical off of my list.......
Berman didn't know shit!Was it ever explained by Berman and co?
Maybe I was misreading the intent of your post. I took your statement to mean that all Cardassians are evil. Is that not the case?No, I don't really think that's a fair comparison.
Did Dukat do anything that stood out as extra cruel? He seemed to have the same thoughts and opinions as the other Cardassians we've seen. He was certainly considered evil by the Bajorans because he was the man in charge. But if you believe him he did try to improve things for the Bajorans.
No, not really. I wouldn't say evil. But we are made to feel that all Cardassians have an arrogance to them, they are the "bad guys" and you're supposed to dislike them. My question is really is, was Dukat an average Cardassian, or was he overly cruel compared to others? Would another Cardassian in his place do the same thing and then also be labeled evil?Maybe I was misreading the intent of your post. I took your statement to mean that all Cardassians are evil. Is that not the case?
If we are to believe Dukat, another Cardassian may have done many more evil things in his place during the occupation. But of course, there are probably others who would have behaved better.No, not really. I wouldn't say evil. But we are made to feel that all Cardassians have an arrogance to them, they are the "bad guys" and you're supposed to dislike them. My question is really is, was Dukat an average Cardassian, or was he overly cruel compared to others? Would another Cardassian in his place do the same thing and then also be labeled evil?
Well, I don't think he's evil actually anymore so than anyone else.I don't think that those are mutually exclusive. Someone can feel loss entirely on the basis of what has gone missing from their lives, but less for the suffering that the person felt themselves.
Personally, I think the notion of absolute, or pure, good or evil was antithetical to DS9. Good characters acted badly at times, evil characters might sometimes be upstanding. Even the "deities" of the series could be shown to lack empathy, and they could shortchange the agency of individuals (even when they might perform as they predict). Dukat felt sorrow at Ziyal's death--perhaps not that of a healthy person, given that he fixated on Sisko--but we, as compassionate people, can understand his loss and feel sorrow with him.
It isn't. You can't use the son of the man who runs a secretive and ruthless intelligence organization as a normal example. And Tain wasn't even just that, he lived the Obsidian Order.If Garak's experience is any indication
No, I feel sorrow when I hear of the death of children I've never met. Dukat never would.but because We miss them
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.