Most character arcs in movies in general, particularly commercial studio movies, tend to be pretty simplistic, or simple, to put it in a non-pejorative form, but simple arcs can still be compelling if done well.Although to be fair, MOST character arcs in superhero movies tend to be pretty simplistic.
Kyle is twice the Green Lantern and the person that Hal is.
Yeah, it's about him always thinking he had more to give and then when presented with the tools to do so not to shy away but rise to the challenge.Captain America was a strong character story - it wasn't about Steve Rogers beginning as one kind of person and learning better, as is often the case, but in a sense about him meeting the challenge of growing up while remaining true to who he always was.
Have there ever been any female Green Lanterns?
Yeah, but that was such an alien environment to Thor that I bought the impact it would have on him. You have to realise that it's not like you or I going to another country or something.it was a critically weak aspect of Thor, as well. Basically, the guy's an overweening, thoughtless prick who, as a result of spending a week in the desert eating diner food with Natalie Portman, becomes a (somewhat) humble hero.
Have there ever been any female Green Lanterns?
Loads. Unless you mean human ones?
Have there ever been any female Green Lanterns?
Loads. Unless you mean human ones?
Yes, I mean human ones that have ever been main characters.
Captain America was a strong character story - it wasn't about Steve Rogers beginning as one kind of person and learning better, as is often the case, but in a sense about him meeting the challenge of growing up while remaining true to who he always was.
And it was a critically weak aspect of Thor, as well. Basically, the guy's an overweening, thoughtless prick who, as a result of spending a week in the desert eating diner food with Natalie Portman, becomes a (somewhat) humble hero.
Weak sauce.
Fillion comes across now as way too old to headline this kind of a flick,
If they were to go with John Stewart for a second film, they really should try to get Will Smith - he's still the closet thing to a bankable actor working now.
Fillion comes across now as way too old to headline this kind of a flick,
I'll grant you the other points you mentioned about Fillion (and I've trimmed), but
Fun fact, Smith is 3 years older than Fillion.If they were to go with John Stewart for a second film, they really should try to get Will Smith - he's still the closet thing to a bankable actor working now.
...I think the problem with GL is that it is a mix of science-fiction and super-heroics. Unfortunately, a film really doesn't have time to embrace both halfs and do it well, which I think is why the first movie fell flat. Either they need to center it on Earth and tone down the sci-fi elements (ie the space stuff) or they need to set it in space and embrace the sci-fi stuff.
As was debated in the New-52 thread, Hal's cosmic villains, especially Sinestro are infinitely more interesting than his Earth-based villains, Hector Hammond included, but especially "winners" such as Polaris, Sonar, Goldface, pre-Johns Black Hand (who's gimmick, aside from a "cosmic divining rod" that sucked up GL energy, was a penchant for cliches), etc.
Yeah, but that was such an alien environment to Thor that I bought the impact it would have on him. You have to realise that it's not like you or I going to another country or something.it was a critically weak aspect of Thor, as well. Basically, the guy's an overweening, thoughtless prick who, as a result of spending a week in the desert eating diner food with Natalie Portman, becomes a (somewhat) humble hero.
I think if you literally went and hung out on another planet it would change you pretty significantly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.