• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

How would you grade Green Lantern?

  • A+

    Votes: 5 3.5%
  • A

    Votes: 7 4.9%
  • A-

    Votes: 11 7.7%
  • B+

    Votes: 20 14.1%
  • B

    Votes: 18 12.7%
  • B-

    Votes: 23 16.2%
  • C+

    Votes: 10 7.0%
  • C

    Votes: 15 10.6%
  • C-

    Votes: 13 9.2%
  • D+

    Votes: 4 2.8%
  • D

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • D-

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • F

    Votes: 10 7.0%

  • Total voters
    142
  • Poll closed .
has anyone complained that Tom isn't an innuit?

this is all I wanted

http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/051/d/b/Star_Sapphire_Manip_by_HeroineAddict.jpg

but...

"I would love to come back and play Star Sapphire because she's a villain," Lively told OnTheRedCarpet.com special correspondent George Pennacchio of KABC Television at the film's recent Hollywood premiere. "That seems like the best way to do an action film, so I don't know! Who knows? We'll see!"

there's always hope.
 
"I would love to come back and play Star Sapphire because she's a villain," Lively told OnTheRedCarpet.com special correspondent George Pennacchio of KABC Television at the film's recent Hollywood premiere. "That seems like the best way to do an action film, so I don't know! Who knows? We'll see!"


After this movie, I would love to see Lively do anything. She's great.

David Brothers wrote a piece about what works and doesn't work in this movie, but what's interesting is that he explicitly notes with examples that most of his "what's wrong" section applies to just about all superhero and action films:

Endangered loved ones are a common trope of action cinema, but let's be honest here: We've seen it so often that it's clichéd and lazy. 'Spider-Man,' 'The Dark Knight,' 'Iron Man' and plenty of others have all had scenes where the hero's love interest or lady friend gets in trouble and needs to be rescued. It's usually followed by a scene where she shows that she is just as capable as the hero, either by attacking the villain or by performing some other action to make up for being kidnapped. 'Green Lantern' features a scene where Blake Lively, as Carol Ferris, gets kidnapped and used against Green Lantern. It goes exactly how you would expect: The hero frees her, drops a quick quip, and later needs her help.

The problem is that these scenes are always, always predictable. She isn't going to die, because then the hero is a failure and the movie is depressing. So, if it's perfectly predictable, the five or 10 minutes spent on revealing how much danger the female lead is in is essentially wasted. The audience doesn't learn anything new. The most we can hope for is a neat bit of action. These days, that just isn't enough.
.
.
.
If you've ever seen a movie before in your entire life, this won't come as much surprise. There are moments when Green Lantern loses faith in himself and has to be talked into being a hero. It's the same as every other action movie, and perhaps most reminiscent of 'Batman Begins.' ...It would be nice, for once, to be able to point and go, "See? Look, our hero has learned something because he did _______," rather than watching someone explain how the hero always knew what he had to learn.

He liked the tone and the casting, and I agree.

'Green Lantern' subverts one part of the superheroic myth very well, with a couple of solid jokes aimed at secret identities, and walks the line between irreverent and space epic pretty well. I'd like to see future installments breaking away from the safe, middle of the road aspects of this movie, if only to get some really good and imaginative action scenes and explorations of exotic alien cultures. That's part of the point of Green Lantern as a concept -- fantastic vistas, unreal action and sci-fi hijinx. This is a good first step. Hopefully part two will get the series to where it needs to be to really take off.

The "secret identity" gag is decades overdue.
 
Last edited:
Reynolds might be considered comic book movie box office poison if this movie is considered a failure. So far he's been in three comic book films and they all were considered critical disappointments and/or failures.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81naJWXRuSk[/yt]
 
All the Green Lanterns in space stuff is the best movie ever. Most of the stuff on Earth was pretty dire.

I get the impression that was kind of an automatic deal-breaker for most fans here, that so mouch of the movie was set on Earth. But that didn't really bother me at all (and none of it felt especially "dire" to me either).

Obviously more space stuff would have been cool, but I also get just as big a kick from the traditional thing of the superhero running around saving the day on Earth. Especially in an introductory movie like this.
 
Reynolds might be considered comic book movie box office poison if this movie is considered a failure. So far he's been in three comic book films and they all were considered critical disappointments and/or failures.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81naJWXRuSk[/yt]

This might win the critics for Reynolds, but I wonder if it will get a wide release. I don't think I would watch it in the theater, but I would rent it or check out it from the library.
 
It was a big, loud, action movie with not great writng. Oops, that's redundant. C'mon, folks, it's spectacle, whaddya want?

Action movies can have great writing. They aren't mutually exclusive things.

Acknowledged, though they usually are. Exclusive, that is. Why I don't usually attend them.

Best writing/character dvpmt in an action flick I can readily recall is Spidey 1 and 2. But 'great' would be a stretch. But I admittedly miss a lot of them.

What's another out there that would be worth watching for the story/dialog? (I can always turn down the volume or skip the stupid fit scenes.)

Die Hard. Raiders of the Lost Ark. Those come to mind.
 
I just saw the film...I thought it was pretty good. Nice setup for a sequel. Only problems I basically had were:

- No Alan Scott? Not even a cameo? :(
(If Alan appears ANYWHERE in this film, I missed it.)

- Fairly horrible CGI on the Guardians.

- How can there be a Sinestro Corps...evidenced by the final scene, which shows Sinestro wearing the uniform...if Parallax has been destroyed?

Otherwise, it seemed fine to me.

Actually they could do some minor tweaking, and have the sequel be a RED Lantern movie. Can you imagine what that'd be like? Who'd direct that, the Saw guy? Clive Barker? Wes Craven? :lol:
 
Why is it that I keep hearing people say that there was too much going on in this movie?!? Did I miss something? :confused: The movie suffered in part because there was too little going on with the plot.
 
- No Alan Scott? Not even a cameo? :(
(If Alan appears ANYWHERE in this film, I missed it.)

He doesn't seem to exist in the movie continuity, which makes sense - that'd be a lot of distracting backstory, and the movie already had too much.

- Fairly horrible CGI on the Guardians.

Yep, the one real failure on the CG front. Unless they're going to hire WETA, they should use actors for this kind of almost-human part, as they did with Sinestro.

- How can there be a Sinestro Corps...evidenced by the final scene, which shows Sinestro wearing the uniform...if Parallax has been destroyed?

Well, again, the movie continuity is not the comic continuity. In this case, the Guardians accidentally created Parallax from the "yellow light of fear" and were later able to create a yellow ring independent of Parallax.
 
Not really a spoiler: Since Alan Scott's power derives from the Starheart, and AFAIK it's basically a coincidence that he was also called Green Lantern, I suppose it's no surprise he isn't in the film. Although I would have liked at least a shout-out... especially after they did this:

Carol's pilot call sign is "Sapphire". ;)
 
Well, they did that because they have plans... ;)

You know, the first Spider-Man film tied Spidey's origin to Oscorp, and the first Batman movie had the Joker as the guy who killed Bruce's parents. There's a dramatically sensible tendency to more tightly integrate important aspects of the continuity when adapting a serial medium that grows by improvisation and accretion into a narrative that will run, at most, about two and a half hours - hence making the Guardians responsible for so much in the movie. Even in the comics Johns and others before him had already retconned Sinestro and other more recently created GL Corps members into Hal's origin story.
 
Why is it that I keep hearing people say that there was too much going on in this movie?!? Did I miss something? :confused: The movie suffered in part because there was too little going on with the plot.

I think what people mean is that there's a lot of noise and activity and flashy CGI going on, but the actual story remains very simple and bare-bones.
 
I'm glad this is tanking
What a horrendous attitude
Oh, spare me the sanctimony. If anyone can easily afford to pay for their own artistic failures, the beneficiaries of the absurdly overly-lucrative Potter mediocrities can. No one's getting fired over this that can't afford it; the biggest losers here are the consumers.


David Brothers
'The Dark Knight' and plenty of others have all had scenes where the hero's love interest or lady friend gets in trouble and needs to be rescued... She isn't going to die.
Either Dennis just spoiled a big Bats 3 twist, or Brothers fails at being a smartass.


David Brothers
It would be nice, for once, to be able to point and go, "See? Look, our hero has learned something because he did _______," rather than watching someone explain how the hero always knew what he had to learn.
You mean like in Iron Man 2, where Tony's resigned himself to a gradual demise because he's too arrogant, blinkered and stubborn to reach out to anyone for help, until Nick Fury's intervention teaches him the value of cooperation, prompting him to aspire to join a group and cause larger than himself and his own private-demons fighting?

Oh, wait... I forgot: the Internets decided that the Fury scenes were pointless Avengers teasing. My bad. :p
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top