• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Green Lantern (2011)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm pretty sure a Martian Manhunter movie would never happen, although it would be awesome if it did, under someone like Nolan, Aronofsky, or Jones. J'onn is probably the inherently most interesting hero in the DCU, if always ignored outside of a League setting.

Captain Marvel would either have to be a period piece (and even then a sociological fantasy piece) or heavily reimagined. I mean, a kid with the power of a god? Alan Moore showed us how that would most likely turn out (flayed bodies in piles in front of Parliament). In any event, I don't think there'll ever be a Shazam! movie either, regardless of the success of GL.

Maybe I'm wrong.
 
I'm pretty sure a Martian Manhunter movie would never happen, although it would be awesome if it did, under someone like Nolan, Aronofsky, or Jones. J'onn is probably the inherently most interesting hero in the DCU, if always ignored outside of a League setting.

Captain Marvel would either have to be a period piece (and even then a sociological fantasy piece) or heavily reimagined. I mean, a kid with the power of a god? Alan Moore showed us how that would most likely turn out (flayed bodies in piles in front of Parliament). In any event, I don't think there'll ever be a Shazam! movie either, regardless of the success of GL.

Maybe I'm wrong.

Well, I'd argue that Thor and Iron Man are in the same tier as Martian Manhunter and Shazam! And they are hugely successful. You can market anything, it will just take more work than Batman (who can honestly market himself these days). But I still say GL is going to be the make or break here.
 
I haven't been as interested in this movie as the Marvel-based ones mainly because I'm more intrigued by what Marvel is doing - building up a huge interconnected network of characters that all live in the same cosmos and whose stories play out over many movies. It's like bringing serialized TV to the movie format - cool!

Anyway I like Ryan Reynolds in the role but those trailers make the movie seem awfully generic. Maybe it's just that they're trailers...?
 
I'm pretty sure a Martian Manhunter movie would never happen, although it would be awesome if it did, under someone like Nolan, Aronofsky, or Jones. J'onn is probably the inherently most interesting hero in the DCU, if always ignored outside of a League setting.

Quoted for truth.

J'onn is probably the most underrated character in all of superhero comics, even among the editors and writers. I mean, the way they tried to make him more popular in the last couple of years by turning him from a broody, semi-pacifist philosopher into this mistrusting "Angry Warrior" (that's what I call the black costume version as well as the SV version), that's a completely new character. And you don't make a character more interesting by twisting him around, you put him in stories which work for the character. Most people seem to forget J'onn's actually a detective. So, put him in some interesting scifi detective stories, something between the "Millennium" TV series (back in the 90s, Lance Henriksen would've been a fantastic John Jones) and "Torchwood".

But a movie is out of the question, unless something can be done with a low budget. It's sad, since I myself have been working on a screenplay for a MM movie, but it won't ever be anything more than a fan project. If I'm lucky I get to write a MM comic book someday and take some ideas from this screenplay to that project, but I'm not delusional enough to think I'd ever be working for a movie version.
 
Yeah, J'onn was one of my favorite DC characters when I first started reading, but he got kind of lame once Infinite Crisis hit. I was not a fan of the new direction at all.

That said, Kai, you should take a look in my sig. I'm working on building an "Ultimate DC" Fanfiction community. It sounds like you'd be a cool person to have there, especially since you're someone who respects J'onn (who is still available). You should check it out.
 
Yeah, J'onn was one of my favorite DC characters when I first started reading, but he got kind of lame once Infinite Crisis hit. I was not a fan of the new direction at all.

He was pretty poorly served by the two most recent crises. (Actually, on reflection, I don't even remember a single scene with him in it in the first. But then I forget a lot about CoIE, because it is uniformly terrible with the minor exception that Perez sometimes managed to produce a legible page, although I realize it is much-beloved for reasons I do not fully understand, possibly because I was not a child in the 1960s or 70s.)

Let's see. In IC, he was beaten up off-panel and held an unconscious prisoner for nearly the entire series for reasons that fail to entirely make sense*; and then murdered in one or two panels in FC. And then there's Brightest Day, which I have not read because it is forbidden by my religion to give Geoff Johns money.

*Seriously. I just deleted an 200-word explanation as to why this doesn't make sense, because I figured out I might be the dumb one for trying to apply something daft like 'physics' to the DCU.

That said, Kai, you should take a look in my sig. I'm working on building an "Ultimate DC" Fanfiction community. It sounds like you'd be a cool person to have there, especially since you're someone who respects J'onn (who is still available). You should check it out.
One time I was going to rewrite Infinite Crisis, in part because it's disjointed and often nonsense, and in part because despite it all it has the strongest and most sympathetic villain protagonists in comics history. The former fact seems to have escaped anyone involved's attention, but the latter Johns did seem to realize late in the game. True to his creepy idiom, he made them an unfeeling sociopath and a mad murder machine respectively. Because that's what you do when you conceive really interesting characters, you make them one-note and boring.

So I was going to do that, but then I mostly didn't. -_- I think part of the reason was that while the OMAC Project was ugly comics and the Rann-Thanagar War was a crime against trees, Day of Vengeance and Villains United were already basically perfect. Of course, I should be ashamed of myself that I didn't buy Shadowpact.

The other part was because I never finish anything.

C_Miller said:
Well, I'd argue that Thor and Iron Man are in the same tier as Martian Manhunter and Shazam! And they are hugely successful. You can market anything, it will just take more work than Batman (who can honestly market himself these days). But I still say GL is going to be the make or break here.

That's true enough. Hell, look at Blade. Three reasonably successful movies, and that guy couldn't sell a comic to save his life.

On the other hand, I would argue strongly that Iron Man and Thor have a much higher q-rating than J'onnz, who strikes me as pretty much virtually unknown, and possibly Billy Batson as well, despite the latter being the most popular character in comics for a good five or six years (those years being six decades ago, however). Thor, if nothing else, has the built-in name recognition factor of being a Norse god.
 
Hmmm...they downplay his weird head just a tiny bit in the poster. It's possibly not the most inspired makeup design in a big budget film this year. :lol:
 
After having actually looked at the trailer, the story and acting are actually firming up for me, but from a technical aspect this thing looks about as bad as ever (for reasons others pointed out, but most particularly the voice thing).

On balance, though, I might enjoy it.
 
Saw a lot of GL toys in the local shops, some of which are movie-specific and others are more comic specific. I don't buy that many superhero figures, but I have to admit I was kind of tempted by the set which includes the Stel chase figure components.
 
abinsur.jpg



CBR| In Brightest Day: Campbell Directs "Green Lantern"

CBR| In Brightest Day: Reynolds Talks "Green Lantern"

CBR| On the Set of "Green Lantern"
 
Huh.

I really don't care much of anything for American comics and their various properties, which I didn't grow up reading (really couldn't have told you what Green Lantern was a few years ago, when they were discussing that version of the project that never got anywhere).

I'm more annoyed at anything else at the sheer preponderance of comic book movies in the summer line-ups (geeky, sure, but not my preferred flavour), and the last of such movies I've seen on the big screen would be The Dark Knight.

Also, the villain for this film looks pretty terrible. Grotesque big head man who the superhero will punch up for some kind of climax.

That said? Film's got some pretty weird looking aliens, the scenes linked further up thread on a strange, ethereal alien planet with a mustachioed alien portentously warning about a cosmic menace looked not half-bad. It's the kind of movie with a fish-headed alien and a don of other weird races on this bizarre planet, a little like the doodles I used to do as a kid (always liked sketching fish head aliens, figuring that any sufficiently advanced multisppecies spacefaring civilization would likely be ruled by them - makes sense to a ten year old). Those stretches of the film elicit a reaction in me not that dissimilar to the Avatar trailer.

I like the lead, as well; his cockiness needing to be tempered when he settles in to responsibility is a formula that's worked very well before - like in this movie called Star Trek; you could practically have Chris Pine saying that dialogue. A film which so openly indulges in such weird fantasticism needs a more regular shlob grounding it for the audience like that.

I guess this film just looks to me like half mediocre, Earthbound, rehashed superhero film (cue bored love interest, stupid villain) and half sweeping weird looking pulp that's like the Lensman movie I'll never get to see. It's the only one of the half-billion superhero films released this summer I'm seriously considering going to view (if guardedly so - man, that Earth stuff, been there, done that), but I'll see how it fares with the critical drubbing.
 
(if guardedly so - man, that Earth stuff, been there, done that)

I know what you mean - I saw that movie two weeks ago. :lol:

Although, honestly, I enjoyed the earthbound sequences in Thor a good deal more than the "epic" interdimensional/galactic stuff. That surprised me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top